Evaluation of tribological behavior of silicon carbide and silicon nitride ceramics under different conditions
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract A comparative analysis of the tribological behavior of commercially available sintered silicon carbide (SiC) and three different types of silicon nitride (Si 3 N 4 ) ceramics have been carried out using the ball‐on‐disk method in dry and lubrication (deionized [DI] water and ethanol) environment. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) was used to understand the morphology and chemical composition of the tribo‐surfaces. Sintered SiC (Hexoloy‐SA) had the highest friction coefficient during dry sliding with an average of ∼0.34. Deionized water showed a minor improvement in friction (∼0.27) while ethanol reduced the friction greatly to ∼0.18 compared to dry sliding. During dry sliding, the presence of an abrasive third body was responsible for the high wear rates (WRs) in these compositions. Hexoloy‐SA showed a lower WR during ethanol and DI water lubrication due to the formation of stable tribofilms as well as higher hardness which resisted the formation of third bodies. In comparison, Si 3 N 4 samples showed a lower WR in DI water and ethanol. The samples also showed composition‐dependent behavior which indicates that grain structure and grain boundary chemistry are playing a vital role in the tribological process.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Metal and Thin Film Mechanics · Advanced ceramic materials synthesis · Diamond and Carbon-based Materials Research
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Mechanical Engineering University of North Dakota Grand Forks USA
Ohio Aerospace Institute Cleveland USA
References (16)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.ceramint.2014.03.03610.1016/j.ceramint.2014.03.036 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.cossms.2022.10100010.1016/j.cossms.2022.101000 ↗
3. 10.1016/S0301-679X(01)00105-010.1016/S0301-679X(01)00105-0 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.wear.2012.03.00110.1016/j.wear.2012.03.001 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.msea.2009.09.06410.1016/j.msea.2009.09.064 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.ceramint.2009.05.01110.1016/j.ceramint.2009.05.011 ↗
7. 10.3390/ma1410249210.3390/ma14102492 ↗
8. FreedmanMR. Evaluation of Silicon Nitride for Brayton Turbine Wheel Application NASA/TM—2008‐214803. NASA Glenn Research Center Cleveland Ohio.https://ntrs.nasa.gov/api/citations/20080008854/downloads/20080008854.pdf
9. https://www.ceramicsrefractories.saint‐gobain.com/materials/silicon‐carbide‐sic/hexoloy‐silicon‐carbidematerial/hexoloy‐sa‐sic‐material
10. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2012.09.10410.1016/j.jallcom.2012.09.104 ↗
11. 10.1016/S0955-2219(02)00106-110.1016/S0955-2219(02)00106-1 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.matdes.2020.10852810.1016/j.matdes.2020.108528 ↗
13. 10.1016/S0043-1648(98)00217-810.1016/S0043-1648(98)00217-8 ↗
14. 10.1111/j.1551-2916.2010.03839.x10.1111/j.1551-2916.2010.03839.x ↗
15. 10.1111/j.1551-2916.2006.01173.x10.1111/j.1551-2916.2006.01173.x ↗
16. https://www.coorstek.com/media/4244/ceramic‐material‐properties.pdf