Effects of holding time on structure and the properties of spodumene/mullite composite ceramics
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract In this paper, spodumene/mullite ceramics with good thermal shock resistance were prepared from spodumene, quartz, talc, and clay when the sintering temperature was 1270℃. In the sintering process, the effect of holding time on densification, mechanical properties, phase transformation, microstructure, and thermal shock resistance of the composite ceramics were investigated. The phase transition and microstructures of the ceramics were identified via X‐ray diffraction (XRD) and scanning electron microscopy (SEM). The interaction between holding time and bulk density was studied by response surface methodology. The result show that an appropriate holding time can improve the mechanical properties of spodumene/mullite ceramics. When the holding time was kept 90 min, the spodumene/mullite ceramics with the apparent porosity was .47%, the bulk density was 2.28 g/cm 3 , and bending strength was 63.46 MPa. Furthermore, since no cracks formed after 20 thermal shock cycles for the composite ceramics with a bending strength decreasing rate of 12.66%, it is revealed that spodumene/mullite ceramics exhibit good thermal shock resistance. Therefore, this study can provide beneficial guidance for both industrial production and energy conservation.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advanced ceramic materials synthesis · Nuclear materials and radiation effects · Microwave Dielectric Ceramics Synthesis
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
School of Materials Science and Engineering Taiyuan University of Science and Technology Taiyuan Shanxi PR China
Shanxi Institute of Science and Technology Jincheng Shanxi PR China
Funding
Natural Science Foundation of Shanxi Province
References (24)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.ceramint.2016.04.15010.1016/j.ceramint.2016.04.150 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.ceramint.2012.10.22410.1016/j.ceramint.2012.10.224 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.ceramint.2017.11.09610.1016/j.ceramint.2017.11.096 ↗
4. Study of low‐thermal‐expansion porcelain employing petalite and beta‐eucryptite
5. 10.1016/j.matchar.2017.09.00610.1016/j.matchar.2017.09.006 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2015.03.01010.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2015.03.010 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.ceramint.2016.08.12110.1016/j.ceramint.2016.08.121 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.ceramint.2016.05.14710.1016/j.ceramint.2016.05.147 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.ceramint.2003.12.00110.1016/j.ceramint.2003.12.001 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.ceramint.2012.03.00410.1016/j.ceramint.2012.03.004 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2019.07.03210.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2019.07.032 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.ceramint.2018.07.20510.1016/j.ceramint.2018.07.205 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2020.12008710.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2020.120087 ↗
14. 10.7498/aps.69.2020023210.7498/aps.69.20200232 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.ceramint.2017.07.20510.1016/j.ceramint.2017.07.205 ↗
16. Influence of the spodumene on sintering behavior of the andalusite‐matrix composite ceramics
17. Effects of holding time on the properties of Ca‐Ba‐B‐Si composite ceramics
18. 10.1016/j.ceramint.2014.11.11610.1016/j.ceramint.2014.11.116 ↗
19. Effect of soaking time on properties and microstructure of calcium hexaluminate synthesized by reaction sintering
20. Effects of holding time on structure and the properties of proppants synthesized by adding waste ceramic sands
21. Synthesis and thermal shock property of anorthite/enstatite multiphased ceramics
22. 10.1016/j.mineng.2019.10584310.1016/j.mineng.2019.105843 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.arabjc.2021.10319410.1016/j.arabjc.2021.103194 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.mcat.2021.11161110.1016/j.mcat.2021.111611 ↗