journal article·2022-01

Comparative study of reactive and nonreactive spark plasma sintering routes for the production of TaB 2 ‐TaC composites

Melis Kaplan Akarsu, Ipek Akin, Filiz Sahin, Gultekin Goller

Publisher page

Abstract

Abstract The influence of two different spark plasma sintering (SPS)‐based processing routes (i.e., reactive SPS [RSPS] and nonreactive SPS) on the properties of TaB 2 ‐TaC composites was investigated. Ta 2 O 5 and B 4 C powders were used as starting materials in the RSPS method, and synthesis and densification of TaB 2 ‐TaC composites were accomplished in a facile single step. The effect of sintering temperature and time on the microstructure and densification of the in‐situ RSPS were investigated. The obtained results were compared with nonreactive spark plasma sintered TaB 2 ‐TaC composites. The highest densification (∼99.5%) was achieved for the TaB 2 ‐TaC composite with 6.64 vol.% TaC after reactive sintering at 1550°C under 40 MPa with a 5 min holding time. Although lower SPS temperature was used in the RSPS method, better densification and higher Vickers hardness were obtained compared to the nonreactive SPS. While platelet‐shaped TaC formation was observed in both processes, the average grain size was smaller in the RSPS method. On the other hand, no significant difference was detected in the oxidation behavior of the composites produced by RSPS and nonreactive SPS.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Advanced ceramic materials synthesis · Advanced materials and composites · MXene and MAX Phase Materials

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Metallurgical and Materials Engineering Istanbul Technical University Maslak Istanbul Turkey

Funding

Istanbul Teknik Üniversitesi

References (48)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2016.02.00910.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2016.02.009 ↗
2. 10.1111/j.1551-2916.2007.01583.x10.1111/j.1551-2916.2007.01583.x ↗
3. 10.1021/am100211h10.1021/am100211h ↗
4. 10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2008.11.00810.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2008.11.008 ↗
5. 10.1002/9781118700853.ch610.1002/9781118700853.ch6 ↗
6. 10.1007/978-3-030-05327-710.1007/978-3-030-05327-7 ↗
7. 10.1111/j.1551-2916.2008.02780.x10.1111/j.1551-2916.2008.02780.x ↗
8. 10.1007/s11669-017-0603-210.1007/s11669-017-0603-2 ↗
9. 10.1007/0-387-23986-3_910.1007/0-387-23986-3_9 ↗
10. 10.1111/jace.1586710.1111/jace.15867 ↗
11. UHTCs: Ultra‐high temperature ceramic materials for extreme environment applications
12. Toth LE · 1971 · 6
13. Storms EK · 1967
14. 10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2014.08.00710.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2014.08.007 ↗
15. 10.1016/0022-5088(68)90184-710.1016/0022-5088(68)90184-7 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.ceramint.2016.09.19310.1016/j.ceramint.2016.09.193 ↗
17. 10.1111/jace.1482410.1111/jace.14824 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.matlet.2008.06.05210.1016/j.matlet.2008.06.052 ↗
19. Fahrenholtz WG · 2013 · 1689
20. 10.1021/j100905a02810.1021/j100905a028 ↗
21. Petzow G · 1999
22. 10.1111/j.1151-2916.1981.tb10320.x10.1111/j.1151-2916.1981.tb10320.x ↗
23. 10.1016/j.ijrmhm.2012.01.00710.1016/j.ijrmhm.2012.01.007 ↗
24. 10.1111/j.1551-2916.2006.00949.x10.1111/j.1551-2916.2006.00949.x ↗
25. 10.3390/ma605156610.3390/ma6051566 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.ijrmhm.2012.09.00310.1016/j.ijrmhm.2012.09.003 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.ceramint.2016.07.05910.1016/j.ceramint.2016.07.059 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2015.12.09610.1016/j.jallcom.2015.12.096 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2012.04.04210.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2012.04.042 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.matchemphys.2011.01.03810.1016/j.matchemphys.2011.01.038 ↗
31. 10.1007/BF0115783710.1007/BF01157837 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2012.05.07610.1016/j.jallcom.2012.05.076 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.actamat.2011.09.03610.1016/j.actamat.2011.09.036 ↗
34. 10.1002/9781118700853.ch1210.1002/9781118700853.ch12 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.ijrmhm.2012.08.00310.1016/j.ijrmhm.2012.08.003 ↗
36. 10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2010.01.03210.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2010.01.032 ↗
37. 10.1103/PhysRevB.5.181310.1103/PhysRevB.5.1813 ↗
38. 10.1016/j.matlet.2011.06.09410.1016/j.matlet.2011.06.094 ↗
39. 10.1063/1.172760210.1063/1.1727602 ↗
40. 10.1016/j.carbon.2011.09.03110.1016/j.carbon.2011.09.031 ↗
41. 10.1016/j.bsecv.2016.03.00110.1016/j.bsecv.2016.03.001 ↗
42. 10.1016/j.msea.2008.09.02410.1016/j.msea.2008.09.024 ↗
43. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2019.10761810.1016/j.compositesb.2019.107618 ↗
44. Comparison of the oxidation behaviour of two dense hot isostatically pressed tantalum carbide (TaC and Ta2C) materials
45. 10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2011.07.03210.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2011.07.032 ↗
46. 10.4028/www.scientific.net/SSP.124-126.81910.4028/www.scientific.net/SSP.124-126.819 ↗
47. 10.1016/j.corsci.2016.03.01310.1016/j.corsci.2016.03.013 ↗
48. 10.25148/etd.FIDC00123910.25148/etd.FIDC001239 ↗