The effect of substrate surface integrity on the surface properties of TiCrN coating applied via the CAE‐PVD method
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract This study aims to investigate how the predeposition machining processes such as magnetic grinding, turning machining, and wire electrical discharge machining can influence the surface properties including electrochemical and tribological behavior of TiCrN nanostructured coating applied on Mo40 steel substrate. A physical vapor deposition technique using cathodic arc evaporation was used to apply the coating. The crystallographic phases and the microstructure of the coating were studied by X‐ray diffraction and scanning electron microscope, respectively. Rockwell‐C, electrochemical impedance spectroscopy and potentiodynamic polarization, and pin‐on‐disk wear tests were employed to evaluate the adhesion strength, corrosion behavior, and tribological property of specimens, respectively. The electrochemical results after 24 h of exposure to 3.5 wt% NaCl solution showed that TiCrN coating pretreated with a turning process with polarization resistance of about 3525.32 Ω.cm 2 had the best corrosion resistance among all specimens. This was because of the improvement of the smoothness, surface quality, and adhesion after the turning process. On the other, the friction coefficient of the grounded sample is less than that of other ones. This is probably due to its higher adhesion strength and higher surface smoothness.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Metal and Thin Film Mechanics · Advanced Machining and Optimization Techniques · Advanced machining processes and optimization
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Materials Engineering Bu‐Ali Sina University Hamedan Iran
Non‐metallic Materials Research Group Niroo Research Institute (NRI) Tehran Iran
Research and Development Department Sakht‐Ara Company Tehran Iran
References (32)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/S0257‐8972(02)00656‐410.1016/S0257‐8972(02)00656‐4 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.cirp.2012.05.00610.1016/j.cirp.2012.05.006 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.cirp.2009.09.00110.1016/j.cirp.2009.09.001 ↗
4. 10.1179/sur.1993.9.3.22610.1179/sur.1993.9.3.226 ↗
5. Krella AK · 2016
6. Holmberg K · 2009
7. 10.1007/s00170‐014‐5844‐110.1007/s00170‐014‐5844‐1 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.nimb.2018.09.00310.1016/j.nimb.2018.09.003 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2020.10368710.1016/j.ijmachtools.2020.103687 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2021.10371810.1016/j.ijmachtools.2021.103718 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.proeng.2015.12.54710.1016/j.proeng.2015.12.547 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.matpr.2017.11.42310.1016/j.matpr.2017.11.423 ↗
13. Grzesik W · 2010
14. 10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2018.02.00110.1016/j.ijmachtools.2018.02.001 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.matpr.2018.10.26010.1016/j.matpr.2018.10.260 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.surfin.2020.10072110.1016/j.surfin.2020.100721 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.surfin.2020.10068510.1016/j.surfin.2020.100685 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.proeng.2014.10.26210.1016/j.proeng.2014.10.262 ↗
19. 10.1007/978-0-387-79108-110.1007/978-0-387-79108-1 ↗
20. 10.1007/978-3-319-14771-010.1007/978-3-319-14771-0 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.matlet.2012.04.15410.1016/j.matlet.2012.04.154 ↗
22. 10.1186/2251-7235-6-610.1186/2251-7235-6-6 ↗
23. 10.1016/S0924‐0136(03)00300‐510.1016/S0924‐0136(03)00300‐5 ↗
24. 10.1016/0040-6090(84)90123-810.1016/0040-6090(84)90123-8 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2009.09.05910.1016/j.surfcoat.2009.09.059 ↗
26. 10.3390/COATINGS1006052110.3390/COATINGS10060521 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.corsci.2005.07.00210.1016/j.corsci.2005.07.002 ↗
28. 10.1007/s40735‐016‐0055‐y10.1007/s40735‐016‐0055‐y ↗
29. 10.1016/j.jmrt.2021.08.01810.1016/j.jmrt.2021.08.018 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.ceramint.2016.03.09510.1016/j.ceramint.2016.03.095 ↗
31. 10.1080/21870764.2020.186357710.1080/21870764.2020.1863577 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2012.05.09510.1016/j.surfcoat.2012.05.095 ↗