journal article·2020-05

Microstructural and technological investigation of bone China reformulated with nepheline syenite and quartz addition

Elif Kabakci, Ahmet Capoglu

Publisher page

Abstract

Abstract In this study, bone china body was reformulated by completely replacing Cornish stone with nepheline syenite and quartz. Effect of controlled milling/mixing on the technological properties and microstructural evolution was also studied. Specimens prepared both from reformulated and controlled milled/mixed bodies were sintered between 1200 and 1250°C with 25°C increment. Sintering and technological properties of reformulated bodies were not being adversely affected but conversely, the measured flexural strength values (55 MPa) were half of the value that was published for bone china (100 MPa). Microstructural investigations showed that enlarged pore formation was the reason for strength reduction. However, improvement in particle packing by controlled milling/mixing eliminated enlarged pore formation and in response, flexural strength values increased to conventionally quoted levels. Detailed microstructural investigations revealed that the reason behind enlarged pore formation was heterogeneous distributions of body components, especially CaO and quartz grains. It was suggested that variations of CaO and SiO 2 to form improper ratio between them would affect the viscosity of glassy phase and crystallization, which would prevent gases in pores to dissolve away. The obtainment of homogenous distribution of body components by controlled milling/mixing has a strong influence on the evolution of microstructure and improvement of technological properties.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Recycling and utilization of industrial and municipal waste in materials production · Glass properties and applications · Pigment Synthesis and Properties

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Materials Science and Engineering Gebze Technical University Gebze Turkey

Presidency of National Palaces Administration Dolmabahce Palace Istanbul Turkey

References (46)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/S0955-2219(01)00371-510.1016/S0955-2219(01)00371-5 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2004.07.00810.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2004.07.008 ↗
3. The development of bone china parts I and II
4. Rado P · 1981
5. Dinsdale A · 1986
6. 10.1016/j.ceramint.2011.01.03810.1016/j.ceramint.2011.01.038 ↗
7. 10.1179/1743676112Y.000000006510.1179/1743676112Y.0000000065 ↗
8. 10.1590/S1516-1439201300500014310.1590/S1516-14392013005000143 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.ceramint.2016.05.14010.1016/j.ceramint.2016.05.140 ↗
10. 10.1111/ijac.1229610.1111/ijac.12296 ↗
11. Karagüzel C · 2003 · 391
12. Nepheline syenite processing for glass and ceramic industries
13. Sibelco Ceramics The Sibelco Ceramics Selector Tool Bone China [cited:2019 Sep 15]. Available from:https://www.sibelco.com/http://ceramics.sibelcotools.com/tableware/bone-china/nepheline-syenite/
14. Fine china trials with Ontario minerals
15. 10.1111/j.1151-2916.1998.tb02290.x10.1111/j.1151-2916.1998.tb02290.x ↗
16. Effect of nepheline syenite on the colorant behaviour of porcelain stoneware body
17. 10.1016/j.ceramint.2004.05.00610.1016/j.ceramint.2004.05.006 ↗
18. Feldspar and nepheline syenite, US Geological Survey
19. 10.1111/j.1151-2916.1942.tb14357.x10.1111/j.1151-2916.1942.tb14357.x ↗
20. 10.1111/j.1151-2916.1940.tb14212.x10.1111/j.1151-2916.1940.tb14212.x ↗
21. 10.1111/j.1151-2916.1936.tb19838.x10.1111/j.1151-2916.1936.tb19838.x ↗
22. Kogel JE · 2006
23. Feldspar and nepheline syenite, US Geological Survey
24. 10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2013.03.02810.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2013.03.028 ↗
25. The effect of nepheline syenite addition on the sintering behaviour of sanitaryware bodies
26. 10.1179/09679780068093810.1179/096797800680938 ↗
27. 10.1179/bct.2001.100.6.25610.1179/bct.2001.100.6.256 ↗
28. Beech DG · 1959
29. Bone for bone china
30. 10.1179/09679780068081110.1179/096797800680811 ↗
31. A comparative study between bone china and hard porcelain
32. 10.2109/jcersj1950.87.1004_17610.2109/jcersj1950.87.1004_176 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.ceramint.2017.01.08110.1016/j.ceramint.2017.01.081 ↗
34. 10.1016/S0272-8842(01)00068-210.1016/S0272-8842(01)00068-2 ↗
35. 10.1016/S0272-8842(02)00234-110.1016/S0272-8842(02)00234-1 ↗
36. 10.1111/j.1151-2916.2000.tb01692.x10.1111/j.1151-2916.2000.tb01692.x ↗
37. Callister WD · 2000
38. 10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2004.10.01910.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2004.10.019 ↗
39. 10.1016/0955-2219(93)90052-S10.1016/0955-2219(93)90052-S ↗
40. 10.1016/j.clay.2018.11.02210.1016/j.clay.2018.11.022 ↗
41. 10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2009.03.02910.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2009.03.029 ↗
42. 10.1111/j.1151-2916.1933.tb19233.x10.1111/j.1151-2916.1933.tb19233.x ↗
43. 10.1086/62575810.1086/625758 ↗
44. 10.1111/j.1151-2916.2004.tb06347.x10.1111/j.1151-2916.2004.tb06347.x ↗
45. Effect of filler size on the strength of porcelain bodies
46. 10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2006.01.01210.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2006.01.012 ↗