Mode I interlaminar fracture behavior of 2D woven ceramic matrix composites
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Interlaminar fracture properties of melt‐infiltrated woven SiC/SiC ceramic matrix composites were investigated using traditional and wedge‐loaded double cantilever beam methods. The two methods produced comparable G IC results for some specimens. The difference in boundary conditions between the two methods appeared to influence the crack propagation path. The DCB method, having free‐end boundary condition, allowed more interaction between the crack and the composite microstructure than the wedge method did. The effect of fiber tow layout sequence had an effect on the interlaminar properties. Higher toughness was observed for the orientation where crack propagation occurs between planes with more transverse tows. Jump‐arrest phenomenon was found to have higher significance on the rising R‐curve behavior than fiber bridging.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advanced ceramic materials synthesis · Mechanical Behavior of Composites · Aluminum Alloys Composites Properties
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Mechanical Engineering Department The University of Akron Akron Ohio
References (34)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.actaastro.2004.05.05210.1016/j.actaastro.2004.05.052 ↗
2. 10.1007/0-387-23986-3_410.1007/0-387-23986-3_4 ↗
3. 10.1002/adem.20040019710.1002/adem.200400197 ↗
4. 10.1061/(ASCE)AS.1943-5525.000032110.1061/(ASCE)AS.1943-5525.0000321 ↗
5. 10.1038/nmat468710.1038/nmat4687 ↗
6. 10.1016/0001-6160(89)90291-510.1016/0001-6160(89)90291-5 ↗
7. Interlaminar tension/shear properties and stress rupture in shear of various continuous fiber‐reinforced ceramic matrix composites
8. 10.1146/annurev.matsci.38.060407.13021410.1146/annurev.matsci.38.060407.130214 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2007.06.00210.1016/j.compscitech.2007.06.002 ↗
10. 10.1016/B978-0-444-87286-9.50007-310.1016/B978-0-444-87286-9.50007-3 ↗
11. ASTM standard D5528 · 2013
12. 10.1115/1.280034910.1115/1.2800349 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.actamat.2017.04.01210.1016/j.actamat.2017.04.012 ↗
14. Fracture mechanics determinations
15. 10.1016/j.scriptamat.2014.10.03410.1016/j.scriptamat.2014.10.034 ↗
16. Development of an interlaminar toughness test for ceramic matrix composites
17. MansourR SinghYP KannanM MorscherGN AbdiF AhmadJ et al.Study of Interlaminar Fracture Properties of Ceramic Matrix Composites at Room and Elevated Temperatures. Vol. 6 Ceram. Control. Diagnostics Instrumentation; Educ. Manuf. Mater. Metall. vol. 6 ASME; 2017 p. V006T02A009.https://doi.org/10.1115/gt2017-65168.10.1115/GT2017-65168 ↗
18. 10.1002/9781119407270.ch2710.1002/9781119407270.ch27 ↗
19. 10.1520/CTR10379J10.1520/CTR10379J ↗
20. 10.1007/BF0073070110.1007/BF00730701 ↗
21. 10.1016/S1359-8368(97)00013-910.1016/S1359-8368(97)00013-9 ↗
22. 10.1098/rspa.1990.000710.1098/rspa.1990.0007 ↗
23. An augmented double cantilever beam model for stud propagation and arrest10.1007/BF00035958 ↗
24. Electrical resistance monitoring of damage and crack growth in advanced SiC‐based ceramic composites
25. 10.1016/S0272-8842(02)00230-410.1016/S0272-8842(02)00230-4 ↗
26. 10.1016/0956-7151(92)90137-410.1016/0956-7151(92)90137-4 ↗
27. 10.1016/0956-7151(93)90366-Z10.1016/0956-7151(93)90366-Z ↗
28. 10.1016/0956-7151(90)90301-V10.1016/0956-7151(90)90301-V ↗
29. 10.1177/10567895930020030510.1177/105678959300200305 ↗
30. 10.1520/CTR10421J10.1520/CTR10421J ↗
31. 10.1016/S1359-8368(98)00014-610.1016/S1359-8368(98)00014-6 ↗
32. Alif N · 2015 · 82–82–25
33. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2009.02.00810.1016/j.compscitech.2009.02.008 ↗
34. Interlaminar fracture toughness of 5 harness satin woven fabric carbon fiber/Epoxy composites10.1163/156855112X626219 ↗