Dry sliding wear analysis of vacuum die‐casted hybrid aluminum nanocomposites using the DOE Taguchi method
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract This study focuses on the impact of wear process parameters on the sliding wear behavior of titanium oxide (TiO 2 ) and yttrium oxide (Y 2 O 3 ) reinforced pure aluminum (Al) hybrid nanocomposites. The optimization of wear test parameters for hybrid aluminum matrix nanocomposites (HAMNCs) was examined with the design of experiments Taguchi method. The HAMNCs were manufactured by a vacuum die casting technique using a unique double‐layer feeding method. Initially, mechanical characterization as tensile and hardness of HAMNC samples was performed to identify the optimum reinforcement. The nanocomposites at 5‐wt.% TiO 2 + 5‐wt.% Y 2 O 3 (HAMNC1) showed excellent tensile strength and microhardness of 127.6 MPa and 75.43 BHN, respectively, than the other configurations of HAMNCs. The three levels of machine process parameters as load at 5, 10, 15 N, sliding velocity at .5, 1, 1.5 m/s and sliding distance at 200, 400, and 600 m are selected to identify optimum process parameters of HAMNC1 that possess ultimate wear properties. The results derived from optimization were further predicted using ANOVA and regression equations for individual influences. The improved grain size observed in the wear surface morphology of HAMNC1 was performed using field emission scanning electron microscopy.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Aluminum Alloys Composites Properties · Advanced ceramic materials synthesis · Orthopaedic implants and arthroplasty
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Mechanical Engineering Department Punjabi University Patiala Punjab India
Mechanical Engineering Section Yadavindra College of Engineering Talwandi Sabo Punjab India
References (65)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1590/S1516-1439200900010000210.1590/S1516-14392009000100002 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2019.01.02110.1016/j.jmatprotec.2019.01.021 ↗
3. 10.1111/ijac.1207410.1111/ijac.12074 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.triboint.2018.01.06710.1016/j.triboint.2018.01.067 ↗
5. 10.1007/978-981-10-2134-3_110.1007/978-981-10-2134-3_1 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.mseb.2014.06.01310.1016/j.mseb.2014.06.013 ↗
7. Nturanabo F · 2019
8. 10.1016/j.matchar.2011.10.01110.1016/j.matchar.2011.10.011 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.jksues.2015.11.00110.1016/j.jksues.2015.11.001 ↗
10. 10.1088/0957-4484/27/42/42570410.1088/0957-4484/27/42/425704 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.msea.2016.02.08110.1016/j.msea.2016.02.081 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.matpr.2020.11.19110.1016/j.matpr.2020.11.191 ↗
13. Mechanical characterization and wear behavior of nano TiO2 particulates reinforced Al7075 alloy composites
14. 10.1063/1.508935110.1063/1.5089351 ↗
15. 10.3934/matersci.2019.6.112410.3934/matersci.2019.6.1124 ↗
16. 10.1177/2633366X2092140310.1177/2633366X20921403 ↗
17. 10.1088/1757-899X/1033/1/01201010.1088/1757-899X/1033/1/012010 ↗
18. 10.1016/S1003‐6326(20)65429‐210.1016/S1003‐6326(20)65429‐2 ↗
19. 10.1007/s12540‐021‐01036‐010.1007/s12540‐021‐01036‐0 ↗
20. 10.1080/00325899.2017.131525810.1080/00325899.2017.1315258 ↗
21. 10.1111/jace.1383610.1111/jace.13836 ↗
22. 10.3390/met904041410.3390/met9040414 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.triboint.2005.09.03010.1016/j.triboint.2005.09.030 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.ceramint.2021.05.00610.1016/j.ceramint.2021.05.006 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.ceramint.2020.01.21410.1016/j.ceramint.2020.01.214 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.matdes.2014.08.03910.1016/j.matdes.2014.08.039 ↗
27. 10.3390/ma1404099010.3390/ma14040990 ↗
28. 10.1080/10402004.2015.111086610.1080/10402004.2015.1110866 ↗
29. 10.1186/s40759-018-0037-510.1186/s40759-018-0037-5 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.cdc.2020.10044210.1016/j.cdc.2020.100442 ↗
31. 10.1016/S1003-6326(17)60116-X10.1016/S1003-6326(17)60116-X ↗
32. 10.1016/j.msea.2019.04.08910.1016/j.msea.2019.04.089 ↗
33. 10.1590/1679-7825313210.1590/1679-78253132 ↗
34. 10.1177/002199831882272310.1177/0021998318822723 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2015.12.00510.1016/j.jmatprotec.2015.12.005 ↗
36. 10.1016/j.engfailanal.2019.06.00210.1016/j.engfailanal.2019.06.002 ↗
37. 10.1007/s11837-007-0023-610.1007/s11837-007-0023-6 ↗
38. 10.1016/j.jmapro.2019.04.01710.1016/j.jmapro.2019.04.017 ↗
39. Effect of reinforcements on the sliding wear behavior of self‐lubricating AZ91D‐SiC‐Gr hybrid composites
40. 10.1088/1757-899X/1116/1/01202210.1088/1757-899X/1116/1/012022 ↗
41. Tribological properties of aluminium 2024 alloy–beryl particulate MMC's
42. 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2006.07.01510.1016/j.jmatprotec.2006.07.015 ↗
43. 10.1080/10402004.2013.76740110.1080/10402004.2013.767401 ↗
44. Montgomery DC · 2017
45. Roy RK · 2010
46. 10.1080/23311916.2018.146719610.1080/23311916.2018.1467196 ↗
47. 10.1111/ijac.1374810.1111/ijac.13748 ↗
48. 10.1080/2374068X.2017.135054310.1080/2374068X.2017.1350543 ↗
49. 10.1111/jace.1572910.1111/jace.15729 ↗
50. 10.1016/j.wear.2014.02.01010.1016/j.wear.2014.02.010 ↗
51. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2019.10713610.1016/j.compositesb.2019.107136 ↗
52. 10.1590/1980-5373-mr-2017-000910.1590/1980-5373-mr-2017-0009 ↗
53. 10.1007/s40430‐018‐1531‐810.1007/s40430‐018‐1531‐8 ↗
54. Investigation on mechanical, microstructural and machining characteristics of B4C – graphene reinforced aluminium hybrid nanocomposites
55. 10.1016/j.wear.2012.10.00610.1016/j.wear.2012.10.006 ↗
56. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2019.10745310.1016/j.compositesb.2019.107453 ↗
57. 10.1016/j.wear.2020.20347110.1016/j.wear.2020.203471 ↗
58. 10.1016/j.wear.2010.04.03410.1016/j.wear.2010.04.034 ↗
59. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2013.04.05110.1016/j.compositesb.2013.04.051 ↗
60. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2006.05.00110.1016/j.compscitech.2006.05.001 ↗
61. 10.1016/j.ceramint.2020.10.06810.1016/j.ceramint.2020.10.068 ↗
62. 10.1016/j.wear.2011.05.01510.1016/j.wear.2011.05.015 ↗
63. 10.1111/j.1551-2916.2007.01884.x10.1111/j.1551-2916.2007.01884.x ↗
64. 10.1016/j.msea.2021.14142010.1016/j.msea.2021.141420 ↗
65. Alves FJ · 2016 · 59