Investigation of production parameters in fracture behavior of hot‐pressed Al 2 O 3 –SiC/graphite fibrous monolithic ceramics: Fibers orientation and cell boundary fraction
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Fibrous monoliths ( FM s) exhibit graceful failure in flexure and have higher toughness values. In this research, a mixture of Al 2 O 3 and SiC as the core and graphite as the shell material of fibers were produced by extrusion‐molding technique and after aligning along intended directions (0°, 90°, and 0°/90°) were sintered using the hot‐pressing method at the temperature of 1500°C under pressure of 35 MP a for 1 hour. The significance of fibers orientation angle and the cell to cell boundary volume ratio in defining the fracture behavior of the FM s was detected. Because of the extensive crack interactions with graphite cell boundary such as crack deflection and delamination, with increasing cell boundary content from 25 to 30 vol%, the fracture toughness was enhanced. The highest flexural strength (184.8 ± 0.61 MP a) obtained from samples with 0° fibers orientation compared to 0°/90°. Since in the transverse plies (layers with 90° aligning), the properties of matrix phase are dominant, hence the strength in specimens with 0°/90° fibers orientation decreased considerably due to weak graphite matrix phase. In addition, the fracture toughness value increased up to 8.35 ± 0.74 MP a·m 1/2 for the unidirectional architecture of (0°) in comparison with cross‐ply (0°/90°) architecture.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advanced ceramic materials synthesis · Aluminum Alloys Composites Properties · Advanced materials and composites
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Materials Science and Engineering Faculty of Mechanical Engineering University of Tabriz Tabriz Iran
Funding
University of Tabriz
References (24)
Show source-provided references
1. Cook J
2. 10.1038/347455a010.1038/347455a0 ↗
3. CoblenzWS.Fibrous monolithic ceramic and method for production. Google Patents;1988.
4. 10.1533/9781845691066.2.13110.1533/9781845691066.2.131 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2004.05.00210.1016/j.compstruct.2004.05.002 ↗
6. 10.1111/j.1151-2916.1993.tb07757.x10.1111/j.1151-2916.1993.tb07757.x ↗
7. 10.1111/j.1151-2916.1994.tb05399.x10.1111/j.1151-2916.1994.tb05399.x ↗
8. 10.1111/j.1151-2916.1999.tb02110.x10.1111/j.1151-2916.1999.tb02110.x ↗
9. 10.1002/9780470294437.ch6610.1002/9780470294437.ch66 ↗
10. 10.1023/A:100488090197810.1023/A:1004880901978 ↗
11. 10.1016/S1359-6462(02)00068-410.1016/S1359-6462(02)00068-4 ↗
12. 10.1016/0921-5093(94)06525-X10.1016/0921-5093(94)06525-X ↗
13. 10.1016/S0167-577X(02)01049-210.1016/S0167-577X(02)01049-2 ↗
14. 10.1016/S0955-2219(03)00266-810.1016/S0955-2219(03)00266-8 ↗
15. 10.1016/S0955-2219(00)00067-410.1016/S0955-2219(00)00067-4 ↗
16. 10.1111/j.1151-2916.1994.tb05400.x10.1111/j.1151-2916.1994.tb05400.x ↗
17. 10.1016/j.ceramint.2014.06.03810.1016/j.ceramint.2014.06.038 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.ceramint.2003.11.01110.1016/j.ceramint.2003.11.011 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.ijrmhm.2017.10.02510.1016/j.ijrmhm.2017.10.025 ↗
20. BrownW SrawleyJ.Plane strain crack toughness testing of high strength metallic materials. Plane Strain Crack Toughness Testing of High Strength Metallic Materials: ASTM International;1966.10.1520/STP44663S ↗
21. 10.1111/j.1151-2916.1997.tb03148.x10.1111/j.1151-2916.1997.tb03148.x ↗
22. 10.1023/B:JMSC.0000041691.41116.bf10.1023/B:JMSC.0000041691.41116.bf ↗
23. 10.1016/0020-7683(89)90021-810.1016/0020-7683(89)90021-8 ↗
24. CiceroS MadrazoV CarrascalI.Estimation of Fracture Toughness by Testing Notched Fracture Specimens and Applying the Theory of Critical Distances. ISRN Materials Science;2012.10.5402/2012/689386 ↗