Fabrication and characterizations of Tb 3 Al 5 O 12 ‐based magneto‐optical ceramics
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Transparent terbium aluminum garnet (TAG)‐based ceramics were fabricated by vacuum pre‐sintering and hot isostatic pressing (HIP) posttreatment from the co‐precipitated TAG powders with different stoichiometric ratios. After component optimization, the transparent ceramics with TAG single‐phase and attractive optical quality were obtained. The in‐line transmittance of optimal Tb (1+ x )3 (Al 0.996255 Si 0.003745 ) 5 O 12.0093625+3 x /2 ( x = −.004, −.002) ceramics (1.7‐mm thick) pre‐sintered at 1700°C for 20 h with HIP posttreatment at 1700°C for 3 h under 176‐MPa Ar reaches 82.6% at the wavelength of 1064 nm. With increasing terbium components, the secondary phase TAP appears in ceramics, which significantly degrades the optical quality of TAG‐based ceramics. The Verdet constant of the TAG‐based ceramics at 632.8 nm is about −181 rad T −1 m −1 at room temperature, which is about 33% higher than that of the TGG single crystals (−134 rad T −1 m −1 ).
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Magneto-Optical Properties and Applications · Glass properties and applications · Photorefractive and Nonlinear Optics
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Key Laboratory of Transparent Opto‐functional Inorganic Materials Shanghai Institute of Ceramics Chinese Academy of Sciences Shanghai China
Center of Materials Science and Optoelectronics Engineering University of Chinese Academy of Sciences Beijing China
School of Material Science and Engineering Jiangsu University Zhenjiang China
Funding
Natural Science Foundation of Shanghai · Chinese Academy of Sciences
References (46)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.measurement.2020.10791210.1016/j.measurement.2020.107912 ↗
2. 10.3390/magnetochemistry701000610.3390/magnetochemistry7010006 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.optmat.2014.05.02210.1016/j.optmat.2014.05.022 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.optcom.2021.12750810.1016/j.optcom.2021.127508 ↗
5. 10.15541/jim2021060310.15541/jim20210603 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.jcrysgro.2021.12645810.1016/j.jcrysgro.2021.126458 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.scriptamat.2019.06.03010.1016/j.scriptamat.2019.06.030 ↗
8. 10.15541/jim2018057410.15541/jim20180574 ↗
9. 10.1007/s40145-020-0437-y10.1007/s40145-020-0437-y ↗
10. 10.1364/OME.4.00212710.1364/OME.4.002127 ↗
11. 10.1364/OL.39.00114510.1364/OL.39.001145 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2019.07.01010.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2019.07.010 ↗
13. 10.1007/s40145-018-0286-010.1007/s40145-018-0286-0 ↗
14. YoshidaH FujitaH TsubakimotoK FujitaH MiyanagaN.Large diameter ceramic TGG Faraday rotator for high‐average‐power laser systems. In:11th Conference on Lasers and Electro‐Optics Pacific Rim.IEEE;2016. p.1–2.10.1109/CLEOPR.2015.7376122 ↗
15. 10.3390/ma1203042110.3390/ma12030421 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.optmat.2018.11.04810.1016/j.optmat.2018.11.048 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.ceramint.2017.07.22510.1016/j.ceramint.2017.07.225 ↗
18. 10.1109/JQE.2004.83476610.1109/JQE.2004.834766 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.jcrysgro.2013.07.00310.1016/j.jcrysgro.2013.07.003 ↗
20. 10.1016/S0022-0248(99)00897-010.1016/S0022-0248(99)00897-0 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.optmat.2017.07.04710.1016/j.optmat.2017.07.047 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.optmat.2011.06.01710.1016/j.optmat.2011.06.017 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.ceramint.2015.06.11810.1016/j.ceramint.2015.06.118 ↗
24. 10.1109/JQE.2019.293715610.1109/JQE.2019.2937156 ↗
25. 10.1364/OL.41.00151010.1364/OL.41.001510 ↗
26. 10.1111/jace.1481010.1111/jace.14810 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.optmat.2018.04.03210.1016/j.optmat.2018.04.032 ↗
28. 10.1002/(SICI)1521-4079(199906)34:5/6<615::AID-CRAT615>3.0.CO;2-C10.1002/(SICI)1521-4079(199906)34:5/6<615::AID-CRAT615>3.0.CO;2-C ↗
29. 10.1016/j.jcrysgro.2004.11.04810.1016/j.jcrysgro.2004.11.048 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.optmat.2019.10927210.1016/j.optmat.2019.109272 ↗
31. 10.1016/S0022-0248(00)00021-X10.1016/S0022-0248(00)00021-X ↗
32. 10.15541/jim2017016010.15541/jim20170160 ↗
33. 10.1364/OME.41293810.1364/OME.412938 ↗
34. 10.1111/jace.1496110.1111/jace.14961 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.optmat.2018.02.05310.1016/j.optmat.2018.02.053 ↗
36. 10.1016/j.optmat.2018.01.04910.1016/j.optmat.2018.01.049 ↗
37. 10.1016/j.scriptamat.2018.06.03110.1016/j.scriptamat.2018.06.031 ↗
38. 10.1016/j.optmat.2020.10979510.1016/j.optmat.2020.109795 ↗
39. 10.1016/j.scriptamat.2018.03.02110.1016/j.scriptamat.2018.03.021 ↗
40. 10.1016/j.optmat.2019.05.03610.1016/j.optmat.2019.05.036 ↗
41. 10.1111/jace.1762810.1111/jace.17628 ↗
42. 10.1111/jace.1330510.1111/jace.13305 ↗
43. 10.1002/pssb.20054122510.1002/pssb.200541225 ↗
44. 10.1016/j.scriptamat.2018.10.04010.1016/j.scriptamat.2018.10.040 ↗
45. 10.1063/1.247264710.1063/1.2472647 ↗
46. 10.1016/j.optmat.2016.09.07510.1016/j.optmat.2016.09.075 ↗