journal article·2022-04-21

In situ synthesis and interfacial bonding mechanism of SiC in MgO–SiC–C refractories

Xin Qi, Xudong Luo, Ling Zhang, Shaoyang Wang, Jialiang Zhao

Publisher page

Abstract

Adding SiC directly to MgO–C refractories possesses the disadvantages of low dispersion and interfacial bonding strength. Herein, the in situ synthesized SiC was introduced into the MgO–SiC–C refractories to maintain the original excellent performance of MgO–C refractories and reduce the carbon dissolution in molten steel. With the increase of Si and C content in raw materials, the morphology of SiC changed from whisker to network, whose growth mechanism was vapor–solid and vapor–liquid–solid. The network structure and uniform distribution of SiC improved the thermal shock resistance of MgO–SiC–C refractories. According to the analysis of molecular dynamics simulation by Materials Studio software, SiC strengthened the relationship between periclase and graphite to enhance the structure of the compound.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Advanced ceramic materials synthesis · Aluminum Alloys Composites Properties · Magnesium Oxide Properties and Applications

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

School of Materials and Metallurgy University of Science and Technology Liaoning Anshan China

School of Metallurgical Engineering Liaoning Institute of Science and Technology Benxi China

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China

References (36)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2017.07.01510.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2017.07.015 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.ceramint.2012.04.07710.1016/j.ceramint.2012.04.077 ↗
3. 10.2109/jcersj.102.2310.2109/jcersj.102.23 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.ceramint.2021.01.13410.1016/j.ceramint.2021.01.134 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.ceramint.2005.03.00810.1016/j.ceramint.2005.03.008 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.ceramint.2014.09.09110.1016/j.ceramint.2014.09.091 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.ceramint.2018.10.25310.1016/j.ceramint.2018.10.253 ↗
8. 10.3390/ma1106088310.3390/ma11060883 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.ceramint.2011.10.04910.1016/j.ceramint.2011.10.049 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.ceramint.2014.11.01710.1016/j.ceramint.2014.11.017 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.ceramint.2011.10.08610.1016/j.ceramint.2011.10.086 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2016.11.01310.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2016.11.013 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2022.03.05110.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2022.03.051 ↗
14. 10.1007/BF0340111410.1007/BF03401114 ↗
15. 10.1007/BF0340104410.1007/BF03401044 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.ceramint.2019.07.08610.1016/j.ceramint.2019.07.086 ↗
17. 10.1007/BF0340104710.1007/BF03401047 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.ceramint.2021.06.04710.1016/j.ceramint.2021.06.047 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2012.08.04810.1016/j.conbuildmat.2012.08.048 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.msea.2010.01.05910.1016/j.msea.2010.01.059 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.ceramint.2020.07.32710.1016/j.ceramint.2020.07.327 ↗
22. 10.1111/j.1551-2916.2007.01589.x10.1111/j.1551-2916.2007.01589.x ↗
23. 10.1016/S1005-0302(10)60112-010.1016/S1005-0302(10)60112-0 ↗
24. 10.1111/ijac.1393410.1111/ijac.13934 ↗
25. 10.1007/s42243-021-00653-810.1007/s42243-021-00653-8 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.ces.2006.03.03510.1016/j.ces.2006.03.035 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2018.07.29910.1016/j.jallcom.2018.07.299 ↗
28. 10.1063/1.492231510.1063/1.4922315 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2017.08.06010.1016/j.jallcom.2017.08.060 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.ceramint.2013.01.02410.1016/j.ceramint.2013.01.024 ↗
31. Reaction mechanism of ferrosilicon nitridecorundum composite with carbon embedded
32. 10.1016/j.ceramint.2016.07.16310.1016/j.ceramint.2016.07.163 ↗
33. 10.1016/0022-0248(93)90034-T10.1016/0022-0248(93)90034-T ↗
34. 10.1016/j.ceramint.2021.03.33110.1016/j.ceramint.2021.03.331 ↗
35. 10.1111/j.1151-2916.1969.tb15848.x10.1111/j.1151-2916.1969.tb15848.x ↗
36. 10.1016/j.ceramint.2020.03.26310.1016/j.ceramint.2020.03.263 ↗