Insight into the corrosion failure of mullite thermal insulation materials in carbon monoxide
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract The service condition of mullite thermal insulation materials is complicated, the effects of carbon deposition are always considered the primary cause of damage to mullite ceramic in carbon monoxide atmosphere. In the present study, mullite thermal insulation material was subjected to a carbon monoxide atmosphere at 1100°C–1400°C. The thermodynamics stability, phase composition, and microstructure of the mullite thermal insulation material were analyzed. Furthermore, the effects of carbon monoxide corrosion on thermal shock resistance and compressive creep behavior at high temperatures were evaluated. The carbon content in the mullite‐based insulation material is below 0.02% after treatment at 1100°C–1400°C. After treatment at 1400°C, most areas in the specimen comprised corundum and glass phase, and K, Na, Ca, Mg, and Fe were detected as impurities, leading to the improvement of cold crushing strength after 20 thermal shocks but a remarkable recession in high‐temperature compressive creep.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advanced ceramic materials synthesis · Advanced materials and composites · Nuclear materials and radiation effects
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
The State Key Laboratory of Refractories and Metallurgy Wuhan University of Science and Technology Wuhan China
National‐provincial Joint Engineering Research Center of High Temperature Materials and Lining Technology Wuhan University of Science and Technology Wuhan China
Funding
National Natural Science Foundation of China
References (27)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.esr.2020.10052310.1016/j.esr.2020.100523 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.rser.2011.01.00510.1016/j.rser.2011.01.005 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.rser.2016.12.00710.1016/j.rser.2016.12.007 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.enbuild.2004.05.00610.1016/j.enbuild.2004.05.006 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.ceramint.2020.02.24510.1016/j.ceramint.2020.02.245 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.ceramint.2019.10.20810.1016/j.ceramint.2019.10.208 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.matlet.2011.02.06910.1016/j.matlet.2011.02.069 ↗
8. 10.1111/ijac.1366710.1111/ijac.13667 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2019.06.27210.1016/j.jallcom.2019.06.272 ↗
10. 10.1111/jace.1592510.1111/jace.15925 ↗
11. 10.1111/j.1151-2916.1998.tb02426.x10.1111/j.1151-2916.1998.tb02426.x ↗
12. 10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2007.03.01310.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2007.03.013 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2007.03.00610.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2007.03.006 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.ceramint.2004.03.04410.1016/j.ceramint.2004.03.044 ↗
15. Optimization of the corrosion behavior of mullite refractories against alkali vapor via ZrSiO4 addition to the binder phase
16. The predictability of CO resistance of refractory materials by state‐of‐the‐art test methods–a technical and scientific approach
17. ASTM C288–1987(2002).Standard test method for disintegration of refractories in an atmosphere of carbon monoxide.
18. 10.1016/j.matchar.2011.03.01310.1016/j.matchar.2011.03.013 ↗
19. 10.1111/ijac.1348810.1111/ijac.13488 ↗
20. 10.1111/j.1151-2916.1982.tb10489.x10.1111/j.1151-2916.1982.tb10489.x ↗
21. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2020.15803610.1016/j.jallcom.2020.158036 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.corsci.2016.01.02310.1016/j.corsci.2016.01.023 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2010.11.05510.1016/j.surfcoat.2010.11.055 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.ceramint.2018.01.01410.1016/j.ceramint.2018.01.014 ↗
25. 10.1016/S0272-8842(02)00207-910.1016/S0272-8842(02)00207-9 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.ceramint.2016.02.16410.1016/j.ceramint.2016.02.164 ↗
27. 10.1016/S0272-8842(99)00010-310.1016/S0272-8842(99)00010-3 ↗