Effect of magnesium silicate on 3D gel‐printing of hydroxyapatite ceramic composite scaffold
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract The hydroxyapatite scaffolds doped with MgSiO 3 were prepared by 3D gel‐printing technology in this study. The effect of MgSiO 3 on the scaffold characteristics has been studied, and the composite ceramic scaffold with higher strength was obtained. The viscosity of different MgSiO 3 weight percentages slurry decrease with the shear rate increasing. When the solid loading was 50 vol% and the shear rate was 100 S −1 , the viscosity of the slurry decrease with weight percent of MgSiO 3 increasing. The scaffold has interconnected internal structures and the sintered body has a pore size of about 350‐620 μm. The porosity of the scaffolds with different weight percents of MgSiO 3 is kept at 65%, and the scaffold with 3% MgSiO 3 has the highest compressive strength of 93.15 MPa. As increasing weight percent of MgSiO 3 , the compressive strength of the scaffold gradually decreases and remains at 40 MPa eventually. The ceramic scaffold with 3% MgSiO 3 has better degradability than that of other weight percents of MgSiO 3 . After soaking in Tris‐ HC l solution for 5 weeks, the weight loss of the scaffold reached 9.91%.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Bone Tissue Engineering Materials · Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies · Dental materials and restorations
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Institute for Advanced Materials & Technology University of Science and Technology Beijing Beijing China
Funding
Key Research and Development Projects of People's Liberation Army
References (27)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.mattod.2013.11.01710.1016/j.mattod.2013.11.017 ↗
2. 10.1098/rsif.2008.0425.focus10.1098/rsif.2008.0425.focus ↗
3. 10.1021/acsami.6b0081510.1021/acsami.6b00815 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.matlet.2016.09.03510.1016/j.matlet.2016.09.035 ↗
5. 10.1016/S0022-3093(02)01036-010.1016/S0022-3093(02)01036-0 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2006.01.02810.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2006.01.028 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.bone.2009.09.03110.1016/j.bone.2009.09.031 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.ceramint.2015.11.04410.1016/j.ceramint.2015.11.044 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.msec.2015.12.04010.1016/j.msec.2015.12.040 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.carbon.2013.09.08010.1016/j.carbon.2013.09.080 ↗
11. 10.1007/s10856-007-3214-310.1007/s10856-007-3214-3 ↗
12. 10.1007/s00542-017-3342-810.1007/s00542-017-3342-8 ↗
13. 10.1007/s10856-005-4716-510.1007/s10856-005-4716-5 ↗
14. 10.1088/1758-5082/6/1/01500410.1088/1758-5082/6/1/015004 ↗
15. 10.1243/09544119JEIM6710.1243/09544119JEIM67 ↗
16. 10.1002/jbm.b.3157710.1002/jbm.b.31577 ↗
17. 10.1007/s10856-007-3089-310.1007/s10856-007-3089-3 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.actbio.2014.01.00110.1016/j.actbio.2014.01.001 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.actbio.2014.10.01510.1016/j.actbio.2014.10.015 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.actbio.2015.01.03410.1016/j.actbio.2015.01.034 ↗
21. 10.1039/C6TB02055K10.1039/C6TB02055K ↗
22. 10.1039/C7TB02667F10.1039/C7TB02667F ↗
23. 10.1016/j.matdes.2016.03.15210.1016/j.matdes.2016.03.152 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.ceramint.2017.07.12410.1016/j.ceramint.2017.07.124 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.ijrmhm.2017.10.00510.1016/j.ijrmhm.2017.10.005 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2006.08.00510.1016/j.ijbiomac.2006.08.005 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.msec.2013.07.00310.1016/j.msec.2013.07.003 ↗