The excellent protection effects of silicon/ytterbium silicate bilayer environmental barrier coatings on SiC f /SiC composites
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract The protection effects of an environmental barrier coating (EBC) consisting of silicon bond coat and mixed ytterbium monosilicate and ytterbium disilicate composite topcoat are directly evaluated by measuring the strength retention rate of SiC f /SiC composites completely wrapped up by the previous EBCs after soaking in a mixed oxygen and water vapor environment at 1300°C for up to 200 h. The results show that the mixed topcoat exhibits not only extremely excellent phase stability but also fantastic protection effects toward composites. After 200 h of corrosion, the fully protected composites are unveiled to present not only dramatically reduced weight gain ratios, less than .6%, compared to ∼10% for those unprotected ones, but also extremely higher strength retention rates, more than 90%, compared to only 10%–15% for those unprotected ones. Further, the fully protected composites show a quasi‐ductile load versus displacement curve, suggesting the retention of the oxidation‐prone pyrolytic carbon interphase of current composites.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advanced ceramic materials synthesis · Advanced materials and composites · Semiconductor materials and devices
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Science and Technology on Advanced Ceramic Fibers and Composites Laboratory College of Aerospace Science and Engineering National University of Defense Technology Changsha Hunan P. R. China
Funding
National Natural Science Foundation of China
References (17)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1038/nmat468710.1038/nmat4687 ↗
2. 10.1038/s41529-019-0075-410.1038/s41529-019-0075-4 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2020.10.05710.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2020.10.057 ↗
4. Ceramic‐matrix composites enable revolutionary gains in turbine engine efficiency
5. 10.1007/s40145-018-0268-210.1007/s40145-018-0268-2 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.corsci.2022.11009910.1016/j.corsci.2022.110099 ↗
7. 10.1111/j.1151-2916.2003.tb03459.x10.1111/j.1151-2916.2003.tb03459.x ↗
8. 10.1111/j.1151-2916.1999.tb01810.x10.1111/j.1151-2916.1999.tb01810.x ↗
9. 10.1111/j.1151-2916.1999.tb02005.x10.1111/j.1151-2916.1999.tb02005.x ↗
10. 10.1016/j.scriptamat.2020.09.00810.1016/j.scriptamat.2020.09.008 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2018.08.04110.1016/j.surfcoat.2018.08.041 ↗
12. 10.1038/s41598-020-70648-010.1038/s41598-020-70648-0 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.ceramint.2017.01.15310.1016/j.ceramint.2017.01.153 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.ceramint.2021.06.11010.1016/j.ceramint.2021.06.110 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.ceramint.2020.07.32410.1016/j.ceramint.2020.07.324 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.ceramint.2021.04.24610.1016/j.ceramint.2021.04.246 ↗
17. 10.1111/j.1151-2916.1991.tb08259.x10.1111/j.1151-2916.1991.tb08259.x ↗