journal article·2013-09

Joining of SiC Fiber‐Bonded Ceramics using Silver, Copper, Nickel, Palladium, and Silicon‐Based Alloy Interlayers

Rajiv Asthana, Mrityunjay Singh, Hua‐Tay Lin, Tadashi Matsunaga, Toshihiro Ishikawa

Publisher page

Abstract

SiC fiber‐bonded ceramics, SA ‐Tyrannohex ® , ( SA ‐ THX ) with perpendicular and parallel fiber orientations were brazed using Ag‐, Ni‐ and Pd‐base brazes, and four Si–X (X: Ti, Cr, Y, Ta) eutectics. Outcomes were variable, ranging from bonded joints through partially bonded to un‐bonded joints. Prominent Ti‐ and Si‐rich interfaces developed with Cusil‐ ABA , Ticusil, and Copper‐ ABA and Ni‐ and Si‐rich layers with MBF ‐20. Stress rupture tests at 650 and 750°C on Cusil‐ ABA ‐bonded joints revealed a temperature‐dependent behavior for the perpendicular joints but not for the parallel joints with failure occurring at brazed interface. Higher‐use temperatures can be targeted with eutectic Si–Ti and Si–Cr alloys.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Advanced ceramic materials synthesis · Advanced materials and composites · Aluminum Alloys Composites Properties

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Engineering & Technology University of Wisconsin‐Stout Menomonie Wisconsin 54751

Ohio Aerospace Institute 22800 Cedar Point Road Cleveland Ohio 44142

Materials Science and Technology Division Oak Ridge National Laboratory Oak Ridge Tennessee 37831‐6068

Inorganic Specialty Products Research Laboratory Ube Industries, Ltd. 1978‐5 Kogushi Ube‐shi 755‐8633 Japan

References (19)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1038/3582010.1038/35820 ↗
2. 10.1126/science.282.5392.129510.1126/science.282.5392.1295 ↗
3. Y.Katoh et al. Proceedings International Town Meeting on SiC/SiC Design and Material Issues for Fusion Systems January 18–19 2000. Oak Ridge National Laboratory.
4. G. E.YoungbloodandR. H.Jones A New Type of SiC composite for Fusion Pacific Northwest National Laboratory Report 112–120.
5. 10.1111/j.1744-7402.2008.02291.x10.1111/j.1744-7402.2008.02291.x ↗
6. 10.1016/j.scriptamat.2009.03.05310.1016/j.scriptamat.2009.03.053 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2008.06.01210.1016/j.compscitech.2008.06.012 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.msea.2007.11.15110.1016/j.msea.2007.11.151 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.msea.2007.11.15010.1016/j.msea.2007.11.150 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.msea.2007.01.01510.1016/j.msea.2007.01.015 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.msea.2006.11.03110.1016/j.msea.2006.11.031 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.msea.2005.10.06710.1016/j.msea.2005.10.067 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.msea.2005.08.17910.1016/j.msea.2005.08.179 ↗
14. Singh M. · 2008 · 303
15. 10.1016/j.msea.2012.05.11010.1016/j.msea.2012.05.110 ↗
16. 10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.484.910.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.484.9 ↗
17. 10.1007/s11661-997-0275-310.1007/s11661-997-0275-3 ↗
18. 10.1007/BF0027489510.1007/BF00274895 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.scriptamat.2005.01.03410.1016/j.scriptamat.2005.01.034 ↗