journal article·2018-03

Torsional shear strength of novel glass‐ceramic composite sealants for solid oxide fuel cell stacks

Beatriz Cela Greven, Sonja Gross‐Barsnick, Thomas Koppitz, Reinhard Conradt, Federico Smeacetto, Andrea Ventrella, Monica Ferraris

Publisher page

Abstract

Abstract To improve the mechanical strength of sealants for solid oxide fuel cell ( SOFC ) stacks, several fillers were proposed in this work as reinforcement for a glass‐ceramic sealant based on the system BaO‐CaO‐SiO 2 . The chosen reinforcement additives were metallic particles including nickel, a nickel‐chromium alloy and silver, as well as ceramics such as gadolinium‐doped ceria particles and yttrium‐stabilized zirconia particles or fibers. The glass‐ceramic sealant, with and without reinforcements, was used to join two parts made of stainless steel (Crofer22 APU ). A torsion test was used to measure the shear strength of the joined samples. The shear strength measurement by torsion gave reliable and reproducible results for all the joined samples. The lowest shear strength was found for the glass‐ceramic sealant without any reinforcement. The composite prepared of a combination of glass matrix and 20 wt.‐% Ni powder seems to be the best candidate sealant, able to fulfill all the requirements of a SOFC sealant. The samples made with this composite sealant presented the highest shear strength values as prepared and also after aging the sample in air atmosphere for 500 hours at 800°C.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Advanced ceramic materials synthesis · Advancements in Solid Oxide Fuel Cells · Concrete and Cement Materials Research

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Central Institute for Engineering and Technology (ZEA‐1) Forschungszentrum Juelich Juelich Germany

Institute of Mineral Engineering (GHI) ‐ RWTH Aachen Aachen Germany

Department of Applied Science and Technology Politecnico di Torino Torino Italy

References (26)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2005.05.00210.1016/j.jpowsour.2005.05.002 ↗
2. Schneider J · 2016
3. 10.1108/0954091031050508010.1108/09540910310505080 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2010.10.03210.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2010.10.032 ↗
5. 10.1111/j.1744-7402.2009.02455.x10.1111/j.1744-7402.2009.02455.x ↗
6. 10.1007/s10853-012-6286-510.1007/s10853-012-6286-5 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2012.01.04810.1016/j.jpowsour.2012.01.048 ↗
8. 10.1149/1.327574410.1149/1.3275744 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2011.02.00210.1016/j.jpowsour.2011.02.002 ↗
10. 10.1557/JMR.2005.008810.1557/JMR.2005.0088 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.ceramint.2013.07.11910.1016/j.ceramint.2013.07.119 ↗
12. Torsion tests on AV119 epoxy ‐ joined SiC10.1111/j.1744-7402.2011.02740.x ↗
13. Torsional shear strength of silicon carbide components pressurelessly joined by a glass‐ceramic10.1111/j.1744-7402.2012.02775.x ↗
14. 10.1111/ijac.1202510.1111/ijac.12025 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.jnucmat.2013.10.00210.1016/j.jnucmat.2013.10.002 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.ceramint.2016.05.06410.1016/j.ceramint.2016.05.064 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2016.05.00610.1016/j.ijadhadh.2016.05.006 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2008.03.03510.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2008.03.035 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2008.06.02010.1016/j.jpowsour.2008.06.020 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2008.09.00410.1016/j.jpowsour.2008.09.004 ↗
21. 10.1179/1743676115Y.000000004210.1179/1743676115Y.0000000042 ↗
22. 10.1016/S1464-2859(06)71320-710.1016/S1464-2859(06)71320-7 ↗
23. Gross SM · 2005 · 1924
24. GrossSM FedermannD RemmelJ et al.Ceramic Fiber Reinforcement of glass‐ceramic sealants. In: Proceedings of 10th ESG Conference Magdeburg Germany 2010.
25. 10.1002/fuce.20120015510.1002/fuce.201200155 ↗
26. DietrichM VerlotskiV VaßenR et al.Metal‐Glass Based Composites for Novel TBC‐Systems. In: Materialwissenschaft und Werkstofftechnik (Material science and technology) Proceedings of the Conference on Thermal Barrier Coatings for Gas Turbines. Juelich Germany;2000; 32:669‐672.10.1002/1521-4052(200108)32:8<669::AID-MAWE669>3.3.CO;2-8 ↗