Effect of Water Content of Synthetic Hydrogel on Dehydration Performance of Nanoporous LTA Zeolite Membranes
Source abstract
Abstract
Nanoporous LTA‐type zeolite membranes were synthesized on α‐Al 2 O 3 disk as substrate using secondary growth method. A gel formula of 1 Al 2 O 3 : 2 SiO 2 : 3.4 Na 2 O: W H 2 O in molar basis was chosen while its water content (W) was varied. Four levels of water contents of 140, 155, 175, and 200 were selected for membrane synthesis. The results showed that the best membrane was synthesized with water content of 155. The most efficient zeolite membrane showed a permeation flux of 0.5 kg/m 2 /h and a separation factor of 3800 in dehydration of a 5/95 (wt%) water/isopropanol mixture at 298 K.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Zeolite Catalysis and Synthesis · Membrane Separation and Gas Transport · Mesoporous Materials and Catalysis
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Research Lab for Advanced Separation Processes Department of Chemical Engineering Iran University of Science and Technology (IUST) Narmak Tehran 16846‐13114 Iran
References (32)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.matlet.2007.03.00910.1016/j.matlet.2007.03.009 ↗
2. 10.1021/ie990902c10.1021/ie990902c ↗
3. M.Pera Titus “Preparation characterization and modeling of zeolite NaA membranes for the pervaporation dehydration of alcohol mixtures.” in Department of Chemical Engineering PhD Thesis.University of Barcelona Barcelona 2006.
4. 10.1016/j.micromeso.2011.10.01910.1016/j.micromeso.2011.10.019 ↗
5. 10.1016/S1383-5866(01)00109-510.1016/S1383-5866(01)00109-5 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.micromeso.2007.02.05110.1016/j.micromeso.2007.02.051 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.micromeso.2007.12.03010.1016/j.micromeso.2007.12.030 ↗
8. 10.1016/S1387-1811(03)00331-710.1016/S1387-1811(03)00331-7 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.micromeso.2012.05.02210.1016/j.micromeso.2012.05.022 ↗
10. 10.1016/S1387-1811(02)00316-510.1016/S1387-1811(02)00316-5 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.desal.2005.02.01010.1016/j.desal.2005.02.010 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.micromeso.2004.02.01510.1016/j.micromeso.2004.02.015 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.ijggc.2008.03.00110.1016/j.ijggc.2008.03.001 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.micromeso.2011.03.04410.1016/j.micromeso.2011.03.044 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.micromeso.2008.08.06210.1016/j.micromeso.2008.08.062 ↗
16. 10.1016/S1387-1811(99)00043-810.1016/S1387-1811(99)00043-8 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.micromeso.2006.12.00510.1016/j.micromeso.2006.12.005 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.micromeso.2011.03.01610.1016/j.micromeso.2011.03.016 ↗
19. 10.1016/S1387-1811(01)00209-810.1016/S1387-1811(01)00209-8 ↗
20. 10.1016/S1466-6049(99)00037-910.1016/S1466-6049(99)00037-9 ↗
21. 10.1021/ie061281810.1021/ie0612818 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.memsci.2008.07.05610.1016/j.memsci.2008.07.056 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2007.11.02810.1016/j.jhazmat.2007.11.028 ↗
24. 10.1016/0926-860X(94)85048-810.1016/0926-860X(94)85048-8 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.desal.2006.03.24510.1016/j.desal.2006.03.245 ↗
26. 10.1021/ie200724610.1021/ie2007246 ↗
27. 1976 E. M. Flanigen J. Rabo Zeolite Chemistry and Catalysis
28. Flanigen E. M. · 1971 · 201
29. Li C. · 2003
30. 10.1016/j.spmi.2009.02.00410.1016/j.spmi.2009.02.004 ↗
31. 10.1021/ie00101a00710.1021/ie00101a007 ↗
32. Estimation of Crystallinity in Flyash‐Based Zeolite‐A Using XRD and IR Spectroscopy