Extrusion‐based additive manufacturing of alumina ceramics through controlled extrusion pressure
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract The development of dense alumina ceramics through additive manufacturing necessitates the careful analysis of various parameters. The extrusion pressure during printing is a crucial but often overlooked factor in the literature. This study investigates the impact of extrusion pressure on the densification and mechanical properties of alumina ceramics. The primary objective is to analyze extrusion pressure to achieve superior physical and mechanical characteristics while maintaining minimal shrinkage. All other printing parameters were kept constant, and the extrusion pressure was varied from 1 to 2.85 bar during the extrusion‐based additive manufacturing of alumina green bodies. The printed and sintered samples were analyzed for linear shrinkage, density, compressive strength, and microhardness. The results indicate that an extrusion pressure in the 2.2–2.5 bar range leads to alumina ceramics with the best combination of densification and other mechanical properties. Additionally, the interparticle bonding mechanisms contributing to the improved properties of the alumina ceramics were examined. This study provides valuable insights into the role of extrusion pressure in the additive manufacturing process, underscoring its significance in achieving high‐quality alumina ceramics.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies · Innovations in Concrete and Construction Materials · Injection Molding Process and Properties
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Mechanical Engineering Indian Institute of Technology Tirupati Andhra Pradesh India
References (55)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.ceramint.2020.09.07110.1016/j.ceramint.2020.09.071 ↗
2. 10.1038/s41467‐022‐32622‐410.1038/s41467‐022‐32622‐4 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.ceramint.2012.05.05710.1016/j.ceramint.2012.05.057 ↗
4. 10.1201/9780429160011-1510.1201/9780429160011-15 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.addma.2020.10117710.1016/j.addma.2020.101177 ↗
6. 10.1002/adma.20160339010.1002/adma.201603390 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.bprint.2022.e0021910.1016/j.bprint.2022.e00219 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.ceramint.2023.10.20410.1016/j.ceramint.2023.10.204 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2022.03.03810.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2022.03.038 ↗
10. 10.1002/adma.20170565110.1002/adma.201705651 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.ceramint.2021.09.16810.1016/j.ceramint.2021.09.168 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.ceramint.2016.03.07910.1016/j.ceramint.2016.03.079 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.powtec.2017.07.04910.1016/j.powtec.2017.07.049 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2020.11.05010.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2020.11.050 ↗
15. 10.1039/C8TC03152E10.1039/C8TC03152E ↗
16. 10.1016/j.matlet.2019.12656410.1016/j.matlet.2019.126564 ↗
17. 10.2109/jcersj2.2105710.2109/jcersj2.21057 ↗
18. TsuiL MainesE EvansL KeicherD LavinJ.Additive manufacturing of alumina components by extrusion of in‐situ UV‐cured pastes. In:2018 International Solid Freeform Fabrication Symposium.University of Texas at Austin;2018. doi:10.26153/tsw/17098
19. 10.1108/1355254091094338810.1108/13552540910943388 ↗
20. Garcia MontañoGA.Fabrication of complex ceramic parts with sacrificial material using freeze‐form extrusion fabrication.Missouri University of Science and Technology;2012.
21. 10.1021/acsapm.9b0070410.1021/acsapm.9b00704 ↗
22. 10.1111/jace.1730510.1111/jace.17305 ↗
23. 10.1108/RPJ‐12‐2015‐019110.1108/RPJ‐12‐2015‐0191 ↗
24. 10.1007/s00170‐018‐1712‐810.1007/s00170‐018‐1712‐8 ↗
25. 10.1007/s40145‐020‐0369‐610.1007/s40145‐020‐0369‐6 ↗
26. 10.1007/s40964‐018‐0037‐310.1007/s40964‐018‐0037‐3 ↗
27. 10.1021/acsanm.2c0379210.1021/acsanm.2c03792 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.pmatsci.2020.10073610.1016/j.pmatsci.2020.100736 ↗
29. 10.1111/jace.1370010.1111/jace.13700 ↗
30. 10.1007/BF0057925110.1007/BF00579251 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2021.05.03510.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2021.05.035 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.ceramint.2022.10.28210.1016/j.ceramint.2022.10.282 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.ceramint.2015.01.03910.1016/j.ceramint.2015.01.039 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.ceramint.2017.01.02410.1016/j.ceramint.2017.01.024 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.ceramint.2019.06.20310.1016/j.ceramint.2019.06.203 ↗
36. 10.1080/21870764.2021.192015910.1080/21870764.2021.1920159 ↗
37. 10.1016/j.ceramint.2023.01.14310.1016/j.ceramint.2023.01.143 ↗
38. LeuMC TangL DeuserB LandersRG HilmasGE ZhangS et al. Freeze‐form extrusion fabrication of composite structures. In:Proceedings of the 22nd Annual International Solid Freeform Fabrication Symposium 2011 pp.111–124.
39. 10.1080/10426914.2022.203214310.1080/10426914.2022.2032143 ↗
40. 10.1016/j.ceramint.2018.07.15310.1016/j.ceramint.2018.07.153 ↗
41. 10.22159/ijap.2019v11i2.3107810.22159/ijap.2019v11i2.31078 ↗
42. 10.1016/j.polymertesting.2021.10737710.1016/j.polymertesting.2021.107377 ↗
43. 10.1016/j.dib.2018.06.02110.1016/j.dib.2018.06.021 ↗
44. 10.1007/s12549‐010‐0036‐y10.1007/s12549‐010‐0036‐y ↗
45. 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2020.10923210.1016/j.ecolmodel.2020.109232 ↗
46. 10.1111/jmi.1253610.1111/jmi.12536 ↗
47. Nearest neighbour analysis.https://geographyfieldwork.com/nearest_neighbour_analysis.htm. Accessed 28 Sep 2024.
48. 10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2021.05.03410.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2021.05.034 ↗
49. 10.1016/j.mtcomm.2021.10253410.1016/j.mtcomm.2021.102534 ↗
50. 10.1007/s40145‐020‐0369‐610.1007/s40145‐020‐0369‐6 ↗
51. 10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2022.10.00910.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2022.10.009 ↗
52. 10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2023.03.06810.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2023.03.068 ↗
53. 10.1155/2014/61815410.1155/2014/618154 ↗
54. 10.1111/j.1744‐7402.2008.02224.x10.1111/j.1744‐7402.2008.02224.x ↗
55. 10.31272/jeasd.24.5.510.31272/jeasd.24.5.5 ↗