journal article·2024-03

Delamination mitigation in additively manufactured Al 2 O 3 via enhanced thermal postprocessing

Benjamin C. Lam, Christopher T. Kassner, James W. Kemp, Bryan T. Leicht, Brian T. Bohan, Lisa M. Rueschhoff

Publisher page

Abstract

Abstract Manufacturing thick (>10 mm) alumina (Al 2 O 3 ) parts through the ceramic additive manufacturing technique of digital light processing (DLP) is difficult due to the large amount of polymer that must be removed. Nearly 35–65 vol% of a fugitive UV‐curable polymer is used in commercial ceramic slurries in order to maintain shape through the DLP process. During the thermal debind, gases form and escape quickly due to pressure build‐up, leading to defects in the form of print layer delamination. Here, we analyze the polymer decomposition through thermogravimetric analysis in order to design a less aggressive thermal debind schedule through strategic thermal holds and decreased heating rates. The new schedule led to a 83% reduction in average delaminations per sample (from 6.9 delaminations per sample to 1.2 delaminations per sample) and up to a 100% increase in wall thickness (from nominally 10–20 mm). A complex, Al 2 O 3 turbine rotor (with maximum wall thickness of 5 mm in the center hub section) of a JetCat P400 engine was fabricated to compare the new schedule to the manufacturer provided one. The improved thermal debind schedule produced a turbine rotor with no observable delamination defects.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies · Injection Molding Process and Properties · Additive Manufacturing Materials and Processes

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Air Force Research Laboratory Wright‐Patterson AFB Ohio USA

UES, Inc Dayton Ohio USA

Air Force Institute of Technology Wright‐Patterson AFB Ohio USA

Funding

Air Force Research Laboratory

References (42)

Show source-provided references
1. Ceramic matrix composites taking flight at GE Aviation
2. 10.1007/978-3-030-70736-1_1010.1007/978-3-030-70736-1_10 ↗
3. 10.1038/nmat468710.1038/nmat4687 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.engreg.2022.01.00610.1016/j.engreg.2022.01.006 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.bioadv.2022.21326110.1016/j.bioadv.2022.213261 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2018.11.01310.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2018.11.013 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.jmapro.2022.02.04110.1016/j.jmapro.2022.02.041 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.matdes.2022.11047010.1016/j.matdes.2022.110470 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.jmst.2022.06.03910.1016/j.jmst.2022.06.039 ↗
10. Additive manufacturing‐General principles‐Fundamentals and vocabulary. International Organization for Standardization Geneva Switzerland.2021 Available from:https://www.iso.org/obp
11. 10.1016/j.ceramint.2020.12.23310.1016/j.ceramint.2020.12.233 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.ceramint.2019.12.11310.1016/j.ceramint.2019.12.113 ↗
13. Tan LJ · 2020
14. 10.1016/j.apmt.2022.10172110.1016/j.apmt.2022.101721 ↗
15. 10.1111/ijac.1231910.1111/ijac.12319 ↗
16. Accuracy of stereolithography printed alumina with digital light processing
17. High‐performance and high‐precision Al2O3 architectures enabled by high‐solid‐loading, graphene‐containing slurries for top‐down DLP 3D printing
18. 10.1016/j.ceramint.2021.10.14610.1016/j.ceramint.2021.10.146 ↗
19. 10.1146/annurev-matsci-070115-03184110.1146/annurev-matsci-070115-031841 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.ceramint.2022.03.32310.1016/j.ceramint.2022.03.323 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.matchemphys.2021.12541710.1016/j.matchemphys.2021.125417 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2013.02.03310.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2013.02.033 ↗
23. The influence of topology on DLP 3D printing, debinding and sintering of ceramic periodic architectures designed to replace bulky components
24. Admatec. Ceramics. Accessed December 29 2022. Available from:https://admateceurope.com/ceramics
25. 10.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.825-826.7510.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.825-826.75 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.ceramint.2022.01.28810.1016/j.ceramint.2022.01.288 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.ceramint.2020.10.06110.1016/j.ceramint.2020.10.061 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.ceramint.2019.09.23710.1016/j.ceramint.2019.09.237 ↗
29. 10.1111/j.1551-2916.2006.01039.x10.1111/j.1551-2916.2006.01039.x ↗
30. 10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2020.05.07910.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2020.05.079 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2007.08.00410.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2007.08.004 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.ceramint.2019.12.11310.1016/j.ceramint.2019.12.113 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.ceramint.2021.01.20410.1016/j.ceramint.2021.01.204 ↗
34. Alazzawi MK · 2018
35. Manufacturing a ceramic turbine rotor for a compact jet engine
36. 2021
37. 10.1002/2016JB01379310.1002/2016JB013793 ↗
38. 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2017.08.01810.1016/j.jmbbm.2017.08.018 ↗
39. 10.1016/j.addma.2014.08.00310.1016/j.addma.2014.08.003 ↗
40. 10.1016/0955-2219(95)00045-V10.1016/0955-2219(95)00045-V ↗
41. 10.1016/j.jmapro.2021.02.04010.1016/j.jmapro.2021.02.040 ↗
42. 10.1111/ijac.1378410.1111/ijac.13784 ↗