journal article·2025-03Open access

Microstructure, thermal, and mechanical properties of hierarchical porous silicon carbide made by direct ink writing

Ying Chung, Shareen S. L. Chan, Katsumi Yoshida, George V. Franks

Abstract

Abstract Hierarchical porous silicon carbide (SiC) ceramics were fabricated by combining particle‐stabilized emulsions and three‐dimensional (3D) printing. Direct ink writing (DIW) was used as the 3D printing technique. The formulation for successful printing is discussed in relation to the rheology of the emulsions. The SiC emulsions were able to be printed with a lower storage modulus (G′) and apparent yield shear stress (τ y ) than previously reported SiC ink pastes. The printed and sintered porous SiC ceramics possess a total porosity of 73.7% with an average pore size within the filaments of 2.2 µm in diameter. A hierarchical pore structure that contains pore sizes of about 250 µm, around 1–10 µm and smaller than 0.5 µm can be observed in the microstructure and pore size distribution. The mechanical properties showed a good strength‐to‐density ratio, and the thermal conductivity was reduced to 4.9 W/m·K. This study provides a new reliable approach for fabricating hierarchical porous SiC ceramics with low thermal conductivity.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Advanced ceramic materials synthesis · Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies · Advanced materials and composites

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Materials Science and Engineering School of Materials and Chemical Technology Tokyo Institute of Technology Tokyo Japan

Department of Chemical Engineering Faculty of Engineering and Infrastructure Technology University of Melbourne Parkville Australia

ARC Training Centre in Surface Engineering for Advanced Materials Swinburne University of Technology Hawthorn Australia

Laboratory for Zero‐Carbon Energy Institute of Innovative Research Tokyo Institute of Technology Tokyo Japan

Funding

Japan Science and Technology Agency · Australian Research Council

References (59)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1007/978-1-4615-5811-810.1007/978-1-4615-5811-8 ↗
2. 10.1179/1743280411Y.000000000610.1179/1743280411Y.0000000006 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2023.07.03310.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2023.07.033 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2022.02.03910.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2022.02.039 ↗
5. 10.1080/21870764.2021.198157110.1080/21870764.2021.1981571 ↗
6. 10.1002/admt.20220110910.1002/admt.202201109 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.jascer.2013.07.00310.1016/j.jascer.2013.07.003 ↗
8. 10.4271/93036010.4271/930360 ↗
9. 10.1111/ijac.1403410.1111/ijac.14034 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.memsci.2020.11819310.1016/j.memsci.2020.118193 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2017.09.03710.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2017.09.037 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.solmat.2006.10.02110.1016/j.solmat.2006.10.021 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.ceramint.2014.03.18210.1016/j.ceramint.2014.03.182 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2017.09.04810.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2017.09.048 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.ceramint.2020.06.04710.1016/j.ceramint.2020.06.047 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2020.03.00110.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2020.03.001 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.addma.2020.10154910.1016/j.addma.2020.101549 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2018.12.03410.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2018.12.034 ↗
19. 10.1111/jace.1730510.1111/jace.17305 ↗
20. 10.1111/jace.1791110.1111/jace.17911 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2022.12.02710.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2022.12.027 ↗
22. 10.1007/BF0054746410.1007/BF00547464 ↗
23. 10.1111/jace.1322010.1111/jace.13220 ↗
24. 10.1111/j.1551-2916.2006.01044.x10.1111/j.1551-2916.2006.01044.x ↗
25. 10.1039/b703255b10.1039/b703255b ↗
26. 10.1016/j.oceram.2024.10063010.1016/j.oceram.2024.100630 ↗
27. Chan SSL · 2023
28. 10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2024.05.01410.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2024.05.014 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.addma.2020.10133510.1016/j.addma.2020.101335 ↗
30. 10.1002/adem.20150029810.1002/adem.201500298 ↗
31. 10.1002/adma.20160339010.1002/adma.201603390 ↗
32. 10.1002/adma.20180240410.1002/adma.201802404 ↗
33. 10.1021/acs.langmuir.9b0108810.1021/acs.langmuir.9b01088 ↗
34. 10.1002/adem.20070034710.1002/adem.200700347 ↗
35. 10.1111/j.1151-2916.1999.tb01860.x10.1111/j.1151-2916.1999.tb01860.x ↗
36. 10.1016/S0921-5093(01)01352-110.1016/S0921-5093(01)01352-1 ↗
37. 10.1111/j.1151-2916.1997.tb02839.x10.1111/j.1151-2916.1997.tb02839.x ↗
38. 10.1007/978-1-4614-3523-510.1007/978-1-4614-3523-5 ↗
39. ZhangL HanXX GeJ WangCH.The relationship between compressive strength and flexural strength of pavement geopolymer grouting material. In:2nd International Conference on New Material and Chemical Industry (NMCI2017) 18–20 November 2017 Vol.292. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering Sanya China 012114 2018.10.1088/1757-899X/292/1/012114 ↗
40. 10.1023/A:102083450944310.1023/A:1020834509443 ↗
41. 10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2010.03.01810.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2010.03.018 ↗
42. 10.1111/j.1551-2916.2007.02037.x10.1111/j.1551-2916.2007.02037.x ↗
43. Effect of forming methods on porosity and compressive strength of polysiloxane‐derived porous silicon carbide ceramics
44. 10.1016/j.ceramint.2012.03.03010.1016/j.ceramint.2012.03.030 ↗
45. 10.1016/j.ceramint.2018.03.19610.1016/j.ceramint.2018.03.196 ↗
46. 10.1111/jace.1445010.1111/jace.14450 ↗
47. 10.1016/j.ceramint.2012.03.00510.1016/j.ceramint.2012.03.005 ↗
48. 10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2007.09.00910.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2007.09.009 ↗
49. 10.1016/j.ceramint.2020.03.10610.1016/j.ceramint.2020.03.106 ↗
50. 10.1016/j.ceramint.2020.11.23810.1016/j.ceramint.2020.11.238 ↗
51. 10.1111/ijac.1462810.1111/ijac.14628 ↗
52. 10.1080/21663831.2015.112116710.1080/21663831.2015.1121167 ↗
53. 10.1016/S0272-8842(96)00009-010.1016/S0272-8842(96)00009-0 ↗
54. 10.1111/ijac.1417210.1111/ijac.14172 ↗
55. 10.1111/j.1551-2916.2007.01777.x10.1111/j.1551-2916.2007.01777.x ↗
56. 10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2022.10.06010.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2022.10.060 ↗
57. 10.1111/j.1551-2916.1954.tb20108.x10.1111/j.1551-2916.1954.tb20108.x ↗
58. 10.1111/ijac.1462010.1111/ijac.14620 ↗
59. 10.1111/jace.1688810.1111/jace.16888 ↗