The effect of spark plasma sintering parameters on the densification and mechanical properties of TiB 2 ‐TiC‐TiB composites
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Spark plasma sintering (SPS) tests were designed using the Taguchi method to create high‐performance composites consisting of 60 wt% TiB 2 , 30 wt% TiC, and 10 wt% Ti. The effects of SPS parameters on the microstructure and mechanical properties of TiB 2 ‐TiC‐TiB composites were systematically investigated. Additionally, the evolution of phase and microstructure during the densification of the composites was analyzed in detail. It has been demonstrated that composites can achieve a high relative density of 99.8%, a hardness of 22.2 GPa, a strength of 739 MPa, and a fracture toughness of 7.07 MPa m 1/2 , as well as a dense structure and small grain size. These properties can be obtained by sintering at a temperature of 1500°C, a pressure of 50 MPa, and a holding time of 5 min. Sintering temperature is the primary factor that promotes the densification of the composite and influences its relative density, grain size, and morphology. Holding time and sintering pressure are relatively minor factors, but they play important roles at different stages of the sintering process.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advanced materials and composites · Advanced ceramic materials synthesis · Metal and Thin Film Mechanics
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
School of Materials Science and Engineering Beijing Institute of Technology Beijing China
Tangshan Research Institute Beijing Institute of Technology Tangshan China
School of Mechanical Engineering and Automation Zhejiang Sci‐Tech University Hangzhou China
School of Physics and Electronic Information Yan’ an University Yan’ an China
Funding
Chinese Defense Advance Research Program of Science and Technology
References (76)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1002/pssa.221153010910.1002/pssa.2211530109 ↗
2. 10.1006/jssc.1997.742910.1006/jssc.1997.7429 ↗
3. 10.1179/pom.1995.38.1.3910.1179/pom.1995.38.1.39 ↗
4. 10.1016/S0955‐2219(01)00205‐910.1016/S0955‐2219(01)00205‐9 ↗
5. 10.1016/S0955‐2219(98)00075‐210.1016/S0955‐2219(98)00075‐2 ↗
6. 10.1103/PhysRevB.63.04511510.1103/PhysRevB.63.045115 ↗
7. 10.1111/j.1551‐2916.2011.04694.x10.1111/j.1551‐2916.2011.04694.x ↗
8. 10.1007/s40843‐015‐0026‐510.1007/s40843‐015‐0026‐5 ↗
9. 10.1039/c2cp44522k10.1039/c2cp44522k ↗
10. 10.1088/0022‐3719/21/15/01510.1088/0022‐3719/21/15/015 ↗
11. 10.6028/jres.105.05710.6028/jres.105.057 ↗
12. 10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.122‐124.33310.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.122‐124.333 ↗
13. Cottrell A · 1976 · 177
14. Telle R · 2000 · 927
15. 10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2007.11.01110.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2007.11.011 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2007.05.01810.1016/j.jallcom.2007.05.018 ↗
17. 10.1111/j.1551‐2916.2005.00832.x10.1111/j.1551‐2916.2005.00832.x ↗
18. 10.1016/j.mtcomm.2020.10145710.1016/j.mtcomm.2020.101457 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.ceramint.2018.09.04810.1016/j.ceramint.2018.09.048 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.jmat.2019.05.00110.1016/j.jmat.2019.05.001 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.ijrmhm.2014.06.01310.1016/j.ijrmhm.2014.06.013 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.ceramint.2018.02.09810.1016/j.ceramint.2018.02.098 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.msea.2016.03.09810.1016/j.msea.2016.03.098 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.msea.2018.08.05810.1016/j.msea.2018.08.058 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.msea.2012.02.00210.1016/j.msea.2012.02.002 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.apt.2018.04.01510.1016/j.apt.2018.04.015 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.msea.2018.02.06810.1016/j.msea.2018.02.068 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.msea.2018.09.10010.1016/j.msea.2018.09.100 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.matchemphys.2022.12587710.1016/j.matchemphys.2022.125877 ↗
30. MccauleyJW D'AndreaG ChoK BurkinsMS DowdingRJ GoochWAJr. Status report on SPS TiB2/TiB/Ti functionally graded materials (FGMs) for armor. Watervliet NewYork: Benet Labs;2006.https://www.researchgate.net/publication/237021739
31. 10.4149/km_2019.6.43510.4149/km_2019.6.435 ↗
32. 10.3969/j.issn.1000‐1093.2015.10.01810.3969/j.issn.1000‐1093.2015.10.018 ↗
33. 10.2497/jjspm.53.13610.2497/jjspm.53.136 ↗
34. 10.1007/s11595‐006‐3502‐710.1007/s11595‐006‐3502‐7 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.ceramint.2020.01.04110.1016/j.ceramint.2020.01.041 ↗
36. 10.1016/j.ceramint.2019.02.11910.1016/j.ceramint.2019.02.119 ↗
37. 10.1111/j.1151‐2916.1992.tb04476.x10.1111/j.1151‐2916.1992.tb04476.x ↗
38. 10.1016/j.matdes.2020.10866210.1016/j.matdes.2020.108662 ↗
39. 10.1016/j.msea.2022.14261210.1016/j.msea.2022.142612 ↗
40. 10.1016/j.matlet.2021.12946510.1016/j.matlet.2021.129465 ↗
41. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2020.15485210.1016/j.jallcom.2020.154852 ↗
42. 10.1016/j.msea.2010.05.08610.1016/j.msea.2010.05.086 ↗
43. 10.1016/j.ceramint.2022.10.23010.1016/j.ceramint.2022.10.230 ↗
44. Roy R · 1990
45. 10.1016/j.ceramint.2018.01.12210.1016/j.ceramint.2018.01.122 ↗
46. 10.1016/j.ceramint.2017.07.12110.1016/j.ceramint.2017.07.121 ↗
47. 10.1016/j.ijrmhm.2020.10530710.1016/j.ijrmhm.2020.105307 ↗
48. 10.1016/j.ceramint.2018.03.20210.1016/j.ceramint.2018.03.202 ↗
49. 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2023.10584610.1016/j.jmbbm.2023.105846 ↗
50. 10.1016/j.fuel.2023.12810510.1016/j.fuel.2023.128105 ↗
51. 10.1016/j.rico.2023.10020510.1016/j.rico.2023.100205 ↗
52. 10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e1064010.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e10640 ↗
53. 10.1016/j.energy.2023.12710010.1016/j.energy.2023.127100 ↗
54. 10.1016/j.polar.2022.10089910.1016/j.polar.2022.100899 ↗
55. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2009.08.01010.1016/j.compscitech.2009.08.010 ↗
56. 10.1016/j.msea.2011.01.09610.1016/j.msea.2011.01.096 ↗
57. 10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2012.03.01210.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2012.03.012 ↗
58. 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2018.11.00510.1016/j.jmatprotec.2018.11.005 ↗
59. 10.1016/j.mtcomm.2019.10057610.1016/j.mtcomm.2019.100576 ↗
60. 10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.26‐28.25110.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.26‐28.251 ↗
61. 10.1111/j.1151‐2916.1996.tb08017.x10.1111/j.1151‐2916.1996.tb08017.x ↗
62. Zhao B · 2018
63. Lian M · 2019
64. 10.1016/j.msea.2012.05.09610.1016/j.msea.2012.05.096 ↗
65. 10.1002/pssb.1967020026010.1002/pssb.19670200260 ↗
66. 10.1098/rsta.1921.000610.1098/rsta.1921.0006 ↗
67. 10.1016/0167‐8442(88)90017‐110.1016/0167‐8442(88)90017‐1 ↗
68. Zhang ZH · 2018
69. 10.2320/matertrans.43.139010.2320/matertrans.43.1390 ↗
70. 10.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2013.05.00110.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2013.05.001 ↗
71. 10.1007/BF0055220810.1007/BF00552208 ↗
72. 10.1016/0001‐6160(83)90047‐010.1016/0001‐6160(83)90047‐0 ↗
73. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2012.03.00710.1016/j.compositesa.2012.03.007 ↗
74. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2014.10.12310.1016/j.jallcom.2014.10.123 ↗
75. Gao L · 2004
76. 10.1080/0141861940824224410.1080/01418619408242244 ↗