The fracture properties of metal‐ceramic composites manufactured via stereolithography
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract In this work, metal‐ceramic composite parts based on aluminum and alumina were manufactured in a two‐stage process. First, silica was printed using a vat photopolymerization technique, followed by a curing and sintering stage, which resulted in ceramic precursors. Subsequently, these samples were subjected to a metal infiltration process to form interpenetrating metal‐ceramic composites (IPCs). These composites have attracted considerable attention in the aerospace and defense sector due to the ductility associated to the metal phase and the strength offered by the ceramics. A novel application with utility includes composite tooling which requires a low coefficient of thermal expansion (CTE) for high temperatures. The investigated specimens were tested for surface quality and shrinkage, followed by a mechanical characterization. It was recorded that the samples presented a 12%–18% of shrinkage after the sintering process. The mechanical testing showed that the hardness, compression, and flexural strength of the composites were superior to the printed and sintered ceramics. A thermal analysis on the composite showed that its CTE is more than two times lower than the common composite tooling materials. It is expected that the present work can provide the foundations for further studies on these systems in the refractory, automotive, and armor‐based fields.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies · Advanced ceramic materials synthesis · Additive Manufacturing Materials and Processes
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Materials Science and Engineering Youngstown State University Youngstown OH USA
Civil/Envtl. & Chemical Engineering Youngstown State University Youngstown OH USA
Electrical & Computer Engineering Youngstown State University Youngstown OH USA
Mechanical and Industrial Engineering Youngstown State University Youngstown OH USA
Fireline Inc Youngstown OH USA
References (61)
Show source-provided references
1. ASTM Committee F42.ASTM F2792–12 Standard Terminology for Additive Manufacturing Technologies.West Conshohocken PA:ASTM International;2012.
2. Gibson I · 2015 · 45110.1007/978-1-4939-2113-3_19 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.matdes.2018.06.00910.1016/j.matdes.2018.06.009 ↗
4. 10.1007/s11465-018-0508-810.1007/s11465-018-0508-8 ↗
5. ZhangS DilipS YangL MiyanajiH StuckerB.Property evaluation of metal cellular strut structures via powder bed fusion AM. In:BuorellDL editor. Proceedings of the 26th annual international solid freeform fabrication (SFF) symposium.Austin TX 2015; p.1410–1421.
6. PavlovM HoebelM RoerigF SchurbJ.Method for manufacturing a metallic or ceramic component by selective laser melting additive manufacturing. United States Patent; US. 10 337 335 2019.
7. Gibson I · 2015 · 10710.1007/978-1-4939-2113-3_5 ↗
8. 10.1108/RPJ-11-2015-017810.1108/RPJ-11-2015-0178 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.msea.2012.09.10710.1016/j.msea.2012.09.107 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.cirpj.2016.05.00210.1016/j.cirpj.2016.05.002 ↗
11. 10.1007/s10439-016-1678-310.1007/s10439-016-1678-3 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.procir.2015.04.02810.1016/j.procir.2015.04.028 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.matlet.2018.09.11810.1016/j.matlet.2018.09.118 ↗
14. UhlandS HolmanR DeBearB SaxtonP CimaM SachsE EnokidoY TsuchiyaH.Three‐dimensional printing 3DPTM of electronic ceramic components. In:BuorellDL editor. Proceedings of the 10th annual international solid freeform fabrication (SFF) symposium.Austin TX:1999: p.865–872.
15. 10.1108/1355254131129273610.1108/13552541311292736 ↗
16. 10.1111/ijac.1255710.1111/ijac.12557 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.matdes.2016.03.15210.1016/j.matdes.2016.03.152 ↗
18. ISO ‐ ISO ASTM 52900:2015 ‐ Additive manufacturing — General principles — Terminology.https://www.iso.org/standard/69669.html
19. Halloran JW · 2000
20. YangL MiyanajiH.Ceramic Additive Manufacturing: A review of Current status and Challenges. In:BuorellDL editor. Proceedings of the 28th annual international solid freeform fabrication symposium.Austin TX:2017: p.652–679.
21. 10.1002/jbm.b.3396110.1002/jbm.b.33961 ↗
22. 10.1115/1.402299210.1115/1.4022992 ↗
23. 10.1007/s11837-006-0235-110.1007/s11837-006-0235-1 ↗
24. 10.1108/1355254121121211310.1108/13552541211212113 ↗
25. 10.1108/1355254101101168610.1108/13552541011011686 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2011.02.02010.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2011.02.020 ↗
27. 10.1111/ijac.1211310.1111/ijac.12113 ↗
28. 10.1023/A:101610221027710.1023/A:1016102210277 ↗
29. 10.1007/s00170-018-2349-310.1007/s00170-018-2349-3 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.ceramint.2011.07.04710.1016/j.ceramint.2011.07.047 ↗
31. 10.1108/1355254061068268810.1108/13552540610682688 ↗
32. Ceramic Resin.2018. Available fromhttps://archive-media.formlabs.com/upload/ceramic-user-guide.pdf
33. 10.1007/s11664-014-3112-710.1007/s11664-014-3112-7 ↗
34. 10.1111/j.1151-2916.1990.tb05097.x10.1111/j.1151-2916.1990.tb05097.x ↗
35. 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2005.04.03810.1016/j.jmatprotec.2005.04.038 ↗
36. MaravolaM CortesP JuhaszM RutanaD KowalczykB ConnerB et al.Development of a low coefficient of thermal expansion composite tooling via 3D printing. Proceedings of the international mechanical engineering congress and exposition (IMECE).Pittsburgh PA:American Society of Mechanical Engineers Digital Collection 2019; p.1–5.10.33599/nasampe/s.19.1556 ↗
37. 10.1016/j.addma.2018.10.03610.1016/j.addma.2018.10.036 ↗
38. CortesP MaravolaM ConnerB SzarugaS HetzelB MacDonaldE.Production of low coefficient of thermal expansion composite tooling manufactured via 3D printing. Proceedings of the society for the advancement of materials and process engineering (SAMPE).Charlotte NC:2019.10.33599/nasampe/s.19.1556 ↗
39. 10.1016/0921-5093(94)06510-110.1016/0921-5093(94)06510-1 ↗
40. Three‐dimensional printing of TiAl3/Al2O3 composites10.3139/146.101263 ↗
41. 10.1016/j.matlet.2005.09.05910.1016/j.matlet.2005.09.059 ↗
42. TravitzkyN ZimmermannK MelcherR FromGP.Polysaccharides to SiSiC composites by 3D Printing. In:BansalNP SinghJP KrivenWMeditors. Proceedings of 107th advances in ceramic matrix composites XI.Baltimore MD:American Ceramic Society 2006; p.37–45.10.1002/9781118407844.ch4 ↗
43. 10.1016/S0921-5093(00)01282-X10.1016/S0921-5093(00)01282-X ↗
44. ZhangW.Rapid Prototyping of Ceramic/Metal Composites. Friedrich‐Alexander‐Universität Erlangen‐Nürnberg (FAU) Technische Fakultät; PhD Theis.2010.
45. 10.1016/j.matlet.2004.11.05110.1016/j.matlet.2004.11.051 ↗
46. MyersK.Structure‐Property Relationship of Binder Jetted Fused Silica Preforms to Manufacture Ceramic‐Metallic Interpenetrating Phase Composites. Youngstown State University; PhD Thesis.2016.
47. 10.1016/j.msea.2006.07.16210.1016/j.msea.2006.07.162 ↗
48. 10.1177/002203451455362710.1177/0022034514553627 ↗
49. 10.1016/j.addma.2014.08.00310.1016/j.addma.2014.08.003 ↗
50. 10.1016/S1359-835X(98)00126-210.1016/S1359-835X(98)00126-2 ↗
51. BreslinM.Transformation kinetics of Al2O3/Al co‐continuous ceramic/metal composite materials (C4) produced by a displacement reaction between liquid Al and fused SiO2. The Ohio State University; MSc Thesis.1994.
52. 10.1007/BF0265393310.1007/BF02653933 ↗
53. 10.1016/1359-6462(96)00084-X10.1016/1359-6462(96)00084-X ↗
54. 10.1002/sia.183810.1002/sia.1838 ↗
55. 10.1007/BF0265185610.1007/BF02651856 ↗
56. Private conversation with technical personnel from formlabs.2019.
57. 10.1111/j.1744-7402.2010.02578.x10.1111/j.1744-7402.2010.02578.x ↗
58. 10.1016/j.ceramint.2016.03.07910.1016/j.ceramint.2016.03.079 ↗
59. 10.1016/j.commatsci.2015.06.03110.1016/j.commatsci.2015.06.031 ↗
60. FerranCP.Effect of porosity on the mechanical properties of zirconia based ceramics obtained via 3D printing. Universidad Politécnica de Cataluña; BSc Thesis.2016.
61. MaravolaM.Low coefficient of thermal expansion composite tooling manufactured via additive manufacturing technologies. Youngstown State University; MSc Thesis.2018.10.1115/IMECE2018-88594 ↗