journal article·2019-03

Nanoscale elastic‐plastic deformation and mechanical properties of 3C‐SiC thin film using nanoindentation

Ahmad Nawaz, Bilal Islam, Weiguo Mao, Chunsheng Lu, Yaogen Shen

Publisher page

Abstract

Abstract The elastic‐plastic deformation of 3C‐SiC thin film was investigated by a nanoindenter equipped with the Berkovich tip. Transition from pure elastic to elastic‐plastic deformation was evidenced at an approximate load of 0.35 mN, when loading the sample at several peak loads ranging from 0.5 to 5 mN. The indentation size effect observed in 3C‐SiC and was analyzed by Nix‐Gao model. In purely elastic region, the Oliver‐ Pharr hardness values were 44 ± 2 GPa. In contrast, indentation size effects were evidenced in 3C‐SiC specimen and the average value of Oliver‐Pharr hardness in the indentation size effect region was 36 ± 2 GPa. Furthermore, depth independent or intrinsic hardness extracted from Nix‐Gao was estimated as H o = 26 ± 1 GPa which was also validated by proportional specimen resistance model, ie, H 1 = 28 ± 1 and H 2 = 28.5 ± 0.1 GPa. Besides, energy principle was utilized to extract Sakai Hardness as 104 GPa, which is combined elastic and elastic‐plastic response. Moreover, based on energy principle, another property, ie, work of indentation was also determined to be 20 nJ/μm 3 . Similarly, elastic modulus had almost depicted stabilized value of 325 ± 8 GPa in pure elastic and elastic‐plastic regions. In addition, plastic zone size was also estimated in elastic‐plastic region using Johnson cavity model at pop‐in and higher loads. Based on the first pop‐in load at 0.35 mN, the distributions of shear and principal stresses were evaluated on various slip planes to elaborate the deformation behavior. Increase in loading rate from 100 to 400 μN/s increased critical pop‐in load from 0.35 to 0.64 mN. This increase in critical pop‐in load with increasing loading rate and values of maximum contact pressure indicates that no phase assisted transformation will occur at pop‐in load. Based on theoretically calculated maximum tensile and cleavage strengths, it was affirmed that the elastic‐plastic deformation occurred due to pop‐in formation rather than tensile stresses. Moreover, it was also concluded on basis of Hertzian contact theory and Schmidt law that the highest possibility of slippage in 3C‐SiC was along the {111} glide plane.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Metal and Thin Film Mechanics · Advanced Surface Polishing Techniques · Diamond and Carbon-based Materials Research

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Mechanical and Biomedical Engineering City University of Hong Kong Kowloon Hong Kong SAR People's Republic of China

Department of Mechanical Technology University of Technology Nowshera Amangarh KPK Pakistan

Vacuum Coating Laboratory National Institute of Vacuum Science and Technology Quaid.e.Azam University Islamabad Pakistan

Department of Industrial Engineering University of Engineering & Technology Peshawar KPK Pakistan

Key Laboratory of Low Dimensional Materials and Application Technology Ministry of Education Xiangtan University Hunan China

Department of Mechanical Engineering Curtin University Perth Western Australia Australia

Funding

Research Grant Council RGC of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, China

References (43)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1149/05804.0119ecst10.1149/05804.0119ecst ↗
2. 10.1021/ac201315q10.1021/ac201315q ↗
3. 10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2008.02.02210.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2008.02.022 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2013.12.00510.1016/j.jmbbm.2013.12.005 ↗
5. Wasa K · 2004
6. 10.5772/1573610.5772/15736 ↗
7. Fraga MA · 2012 · 313
8. 10.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.711.310.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.711.3 ↗
9. 10.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.821-823.18910.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.821-823.189 ↗
10. 10.1039/C5RA20289B10.1039/C5RA20289B ↗
11. The electrical characteristics of metal‐oxide‐semiconductor field effect transistors fabricated on cubic silicon carbide
12. 10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2012.04.01610.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2012.04.016 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.ceramint.2016.09.17010.1016/j.ceramint.2016.09.170 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.actamat.2014.07.05510.1016/j.actamat.2014.07.055 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.commatsci.2017.05.04810.1016/j.commatsci.2017.05.048 ↗
16. 10.1557/jmr.2004.19.1.310.1557/jmr.2004.19.1.3 ↗
17. 10.1557/jmr.2009.014410.1557/jmr.2009.0144 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.procir.2013.06.11210.1016/j.procir.2013.06.112 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.msea.2015.11.10010.1016/j.msea.2015.11.100 ↗
20. ReddyJD.Mechanical properties of silicon carbide (SiC) thin films PhD Dissertation University of South Florida;2008.
21. 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2004.03.03710.1016/j.surfcoat.2004.03.037 ↗
22. 10.1016/S0022-5096(97)00086-010.1016/S0022-5096(97)00086-0 ↗
23. 10.1557/JMR.1998.014610.1557/JMR.1998.0146 ↗
24. 10.1016/S0955-2219(03)00641-110.1016/S0955-2219(03)00641-1 ↗
25. 10.1007/978-0-387-68188-710.1007/978-0-387-68188-7 ↗
26. 10.1016/1359-6454(96)00010-910.1016/1359-6454(96)00010-9 ↗
27. Material properties of a sintered α‐SiC
28. 10.1103/PhysRevB.44.368510.1103/PhysRevB.44.3685 ↗
29. 10.1002/jbm.a.3105110.1002/jbm.a.31051 ↗
30. The Meyer hardness: a measure for plasticity?
31. 10.1016/j.scriptamat.2011.03.02210.1016/j.scriptamat.2011.03.022 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.tsf.2008.06.00210.1016/j.tsf.2008.06.002 ↗
33. 10.1111/j.1744-7402.2011.02686.x10.1111/j.1744-7402.2011.02686.x ↗
34. 10.1016/j.jmst.2016.02.00910.1016/j.jmst.2016.02.009 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2005.09.01110.1016/j.jbiomech.2005.09.011 ↗
36. 10.1016/j.jmps.2011.04.00310.1016/j.jmps.2011.04.003 ↗
37. 10.1063/1.213589610.1063/1.2135896 ↗
38. Hertzberg RW · 1996
39. 10.1063/1.481826010.1063/1.4818260 ↗
40. 10.1016/j.scriptamat.2005.06.04210.1016/j.scriptamat.2005.06.042 ↗
41. 10.1111/j.1551-2916.2012.05251.x10.1111/j.1551-2916.2012.05251.x ↗
42. 10.1103/PhysRevB.48.1058710.1103/PhysRevB.48.10587 ↗
43. 10.1016/j.actamat.2009.08.04110.1016/j.actamat.2009.08.041 ↗