Interlaboratory round robin study on axial tensile properties of SiC‐SiC CMC tubular test specimens
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract An interlaboratory round robin study was conducted on the tensile strength of SiC‐SiC ceramic matrix composite ( CMC ) tubular test specimens at room temperature with the objective of expanding the database of mechanical properties of nuclear grade SiC‐SiC and establishing the precision and bias statement for standard test method ASTM C1773. The mechanical properties statistics from the round robin study and the precision statistics and precision statement are presented herein. The data show reasonable consistency across the laboratories, indicating that the current C1773‐13 ASTM standard is adequate for testing ceramic fiber reinforced ceramic matrix composite tubular test specimen. It was found that the distribution of ultimate tensile strength data was best described with a two‐parameter Weibull distribution, while a lognormal distribution provided a good description of the distribution of proportional limit stress data.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advanced ceramic materials synthesis · High-Velocity Impact and Material Behavior · Fatigue and fracture mechanics
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Oak Ridge National Laboratory Materials Science and Technology Division Oak Ridge Tennessee
Gateway Materials Technology, Inc. Mt. Prospect Illinois
General Atomics Inc. San Diego California
Funding
U.S. Department of Energy
References (37)
Show source-provided references
1. CarmackJ GoldnerF Bragg‐SittonSM SneadLL editors.Overview of the US DOE accident tolerant fuel development program. Proc 2013 LWR Fuel Performance Meeting/TopFuel 2013;2013.
2. 10.1016/j.jnucmat.2013.12.00510.1016/j.jnucmat.2013.12.005 ↗
3. Clad in clay
4. 10.1016/j.jnucmat.2013.12.00410.1016/j.jnucmat.2013.12.004 ↗
5. Engineering challenges of LWR advanced fuel cladding technology in preparation for in‐reactor demonstrations
6. FazluddinS SmitK SlabberJ editors.The use of advanced materials in VHTR's. Second International Topical Meeting on High Temperature Reactor Technology;2004.
7. KohyamaA HinokiT MizunoT et al. editors.R& D of Advanced material systems for reactor core component of gas cooled fast reactor. Proceedings of the International Congress on Advances in Nuclear Power Plants;2005.
8. 10.2172/98271710.2172/982717 ↗
9. ChaffronL SéranJ SauderC et al. editors.SiC/SiC composite materials for fast reactor applications. Proceedings of ICAPP; 2011.
10. 10.1016/S0920-3796(01)00181-810.1016/S0920-3796(01)00181-8 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.fusengdes.2008.04.01210.1016/j.fusengdes.2008.04.012 ↗
12. 10.1002/9781118832998.ch2210.1002/9781118832998.ch22 ↗
13. 10.2172/121560610.2172/1215606 ↗
14. Jenkins MG · 2000
15. ASTM International · 2013
16. ASTM International · 2015
17. ISO/PRF 20323 Fine ceramics (advanced ceramics advanced technical ceramics) – Mechanical properties of ceramic composites at ambient temperature in air atmospheric pressure – Determination of tensile properties of tubes.https://wwwisoorg/standard/67672html.
18. 10.1016/j.fusengdes.2012.02.02610.1016/j.fusengdes.2012.02.026 ↗
19. 10.1177/00219983710050010610.1177/002199837100500106 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.jnucmat.2014.06.03510.1016/j.jnucmat.2014.06.035 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.jnucmat.2015.08.02010.1016/j.jnucmat.2015.08.020 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2015.04.02210.1016/j.compositesa.2015.04.022 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2014.09.02110.1016/j.compositesa.2014.09.021 ↗
24. ASTM International · 2016
25. 10.1016/j.jnucmat.2016.06.00610.1016/j.jnucmat.2016.06.006 ↗
26. YunHM DiCarloJA editors.Comparison of the tensile creep and rupture strength properties of stoichiometric SiC fibers. Proceedings of the 23rd annual conference on composites materials and structures;1999.
27. UranoA SakamotoJ‐i TakedaM ImaiY ArakiH NodaT editors.Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of SiC Fiber” Hi‐Nicalon Type S” Reinforced SiC Composites. 22nd Annual Conference on Composites Advanced Ceramics Materials and Structures‐A: Ceramic Engineering and Science Proceedings Volume19;2009:John Wiley & Sons.
28. TakedaM SakamotoJ SaekiA IchikawaH.Mechanical and structural analysis of silicon carbide fiber Hi‐Hicalon type S. Ceramic Engineering and Science Proceedings. 17 No. 4.Westerville OH:American Ceramic Society;1996:35‐42.10.1002/9780470314876.ch2 ↗
29. 10.1146/annurev-matsci-070115-03212710.1146/annurev-matsci-070115-032127 ↗
30. 10.1111/j.1151-2916.2002.tb00505.x10.1111/j.1151-2916.2002.tb00505.x ↗
31. 10.1016/S0266-3538(03)00230-610.1016/S0266-3538(03)00230-6 ↗
32. 10.2320/matertrans1989.34.112210.2320/matertrans1989.34.1122 ↗
33. KohyamaA editor.Present status of NITE‐SiC/SiC for advanced nuclear energy systems. 31st International Conference on Advanced Ceramics and Composites Daytona Beach;2007.
34. 10.1016/j.jnucmat.2013.10.00510.1016/j.jnucmat.2013.10.005 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.jnucmat.2014.12.12110.1016/j.jnucmat.2014.12.121 ↗
36. SinghG GonczyS Lara‐CurzioE KatohY.Interlaboratory Round Robin Study on Axial Tensile Properties of SiC/SiC Tubular Specimens ORNL/SR‐2017/397.2017.10.2172/1484149 ↗
37. 10.1080/0361091840881237810.1080/03610918408812378 ↗