Mechanical characterization of parts produced by ceramic on‐demand extrusion process
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Ceramic On‐Demand Extrusion ( CODE ) is an additive manufacturing process recently developed to produce dense three‐dimensional ceramic components. In this paper, the properties of parts produced using this freeform extrusion fabrication process are described. High solids loading (~60 vol%) alumina paste was prepared to fabricate parts and standard test methods were employed to examine their properties including the density, strength, Young's modulus, Weibull modulus, toughness, and hardness. Microstructural evaluation was also performed to measure the grain size and critical flaw size. The results indicate that the properties of parts surpass most other ceramic additive manufacturing processes and match conventional fabrication techniques.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies · Innovations in Concrete and Construction Materials · Additive Manufacturing Materials and Processes
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering Missouri University of Science and Technology Rolla MO USA
Department of Materials Science and Engineering Missouri University of Science and Technology Rolla MO USA
Funding
U.S. Department of Energy
References (34)
Show source-provided references
1. GriffinEA McMillinS. Selective laser sintering and fused deposition modeling processes for functional ceramic parts. In:Solid Freeform Fabrication Symposium.Austin TX USA;1995:25‐30.
2. 10.1111/j.1151-2916.1996.tb09022.x10.1111/j.1151-2916.1996.tb09022.x ↗
3. GrauJ MoonJ UhlandS CimaMJ SachsE. High green density ceramic components fabricated by the slurry‐based 3DP process. In:Solid Freeform Fabrication Symposium.Austin TX USA;1997:371‐378.
4. 10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2005.03.22310.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2005.03.223 ↗
5. Desktop manufacturing: LOM vs pressing
6. 10.1080/10667857.1995.1175261410.1080/10667857.1995.11752614 ↗
7. StuffleK MulliganA CalvertP LombardiJ. Solid freebody forming of ceramics from polymerizable slurry. In:Solid Freeform Fabrication Symposium.Austin TX USA;1993:60‐63.10.1557/PROC-346-1027 ↗
8. Robocasting provides moldless fabrication from slurry deposition
9. HuangT MasonMS HilmasGE LeuMC. Freeze‐form extrusion fabrication of ceramics. In:Solid Freeform Fabrication Symposium.Austin TX USA;2005:73‐85.
10. 10.1002/adem.20140009710.1002/adem.201400097 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.matdes.2012.03.02610.1016/j.matdes.2012.03.026 ↗
12. 10.1111/jace.1370010.1111/jace.13700 ↗
13. Ghazanfari A · 2016 · 1509
14. ZomorodiH LandersRG. Extrusion based additive manufacturing using explicit model predictive control. In:American Control Conference.Boston MA USA;2016:1747‐1752.10.1109/ACC.2016.7525169 ↗
15. ASTM C1161.Standard Test Method for Flexural Strength of Advanced Ceramics at Ambient Temperatures.West Conshohocken PA USA;2013. doi:10.1520/C1161‐13.10.1520/C1161 ↗
16. ASTM C1239.Standard Practice for Reporting Uniaxial Strength Data and Estimating Weibull Distribution Parameters for Advanced Ceramics.West Conshohocken PA USA;2013. doi:10.1520/C1239‐13.10.1520/C1239 ↗
17. ASTM C1421.Standard Test Methods for Determination of Fracture Toughness of Advanced Ceramics.West Conshohocken PA USA;2010. doi:10.1520/C1421‐10.10.1520/C1421 ↗
18. ASTM C1327.Standard Test Method for Vickers Indentation Hardness of Advanced Ceramics.West Conshohocken PA USA;2015. doi:10.1520/C1327‐15.10.1520/C1327 ↗
19. Sadd MH · 2009
20. 10.1002/978047061241510.1002/9780470612415 ↗
21. 10.1016/B978-0-08-034720-2.50010-110.1016/B978-0-08-034720-2.50010-1 ↗
22. AuerkariP.Mechanical and Physical Properties of Engineering Alumina Ceramics Vol 1792. Vuorimiehentie Finland;1996.
23. ASTM C1322.Standard Practice for Fractography and Characterization of Fracture Origins in Advanced Ceramics.West Conshohocken PA USA;2010. doi:10.1520/C1322‐05BR10.10.1520/C1322 ↗
24. ASTM C1683.Standard Practice for Size Scaling of Tensile Strengths Using Weibull Statistics for Advanced Ceramics.West Conshohocken PA USA;2015. doi:10.1520/C1683‐10R15.10.1520/C1683 ↗
25. 10.1111/ijac.1231910.1111/ijac.12319 ↗
26. 10.1007/978-1-84628-988-0_7910.1007/978-1-84628-988-0_79 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2016.03.00110.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2016.03.001 ↗
28. Li J · 2015 · 319
29. 10.1108/1355254091094338810.1108/13552540910943388 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2014.01.01910.1016/j.jmatprotec.2014.01.019 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.ceramint.2016.03.07910.1016/j.ceramint.2016.03.079 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.matdes.2016.09.07410.1016/j.matdes.2016.09.074 ↗
33. 10.1016/0010-4485(94)90032-910.1016/0010-4485(94)90032-9 ↗
34. 10.1080/17452759.2015.109679810.1080/17452759.2015.1096798 ↗