Microtensile bond strength testing of resin cements
Source abstract
Abstract
To investigate the microtensile bond strength (μTBS) and failure mode of resin cements bonded to ceramic blocks following various surface treatments. Seventy-two Ceramco II (Ceramco lnc., Burlington, NJ) ceramic discs 10 mm in diameter and 4 mm thick were prepared. The ceramic specimens received 8 different surface conditions treatments before the application of resin cement. These surface treatments were sanding with 600-grit silicon carbide paper, microetching with aluminum oxide, sanding followed by silane application, microetching followed by silane application, hydrofluoric acid etching, hydrofluoric acid etching followed by silane application, application of adhesive resin, and combination of the previous two treatments (HF+S+Adh). Seventy-two extracted molars were ground flat at 90° to the long axis of the tooth until a sufficient circular area of dentin was exposed (at least 5 mm in diameter). Three resin cements were applied to these surfaces. After 24 h storage at 37 °C, the non-trimming version of μTBS test was used to produce 1 mm 2 microbars. The microbars were subjected to a tensile load using a modified testing device. Data were analyzed with 2-way analysis of variance. The interaction between the substrate surface treatment and cement type is significant ( p<0.001). The results of this in vitro study suggest that when the tested ceramic restoration is cemented with a resin cement system, the ceramic should be etched with hydrofluoric acid, silane and adhesive should be applied prior to cementation. The results also suggest that an auto- or light-polymerizing cement should be considered instead of a dual-polymerizing cement.
Source: expertdata · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Dental materials and restorations · Dental Implant Techniques and Outcomes · Endodontics and Root Canal Treatments
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (35)
Show source-provided references
1. In the light of nature
2. Porcelain-fused-to-metal vs. nonmetal crowns10.14219/jada.archive.1999.0211 ↗
3. The effect of variations in bonding procedure on fracture resistance of dentin-bonded all-ceramic crowns
4. Etched-porcelain resin-bonded full-veneer crowns: in vitro fracture resistance
5. Influence of a dentin bonding agent on the fracture load of Dicor
6. Shear bond strength of resin cements to both ceramic and dentin10.1067/mpr.2002.128034 ↗
7. In vitro resistance to fracture of porcelain inlays bonded to tooth
8. Fracture resistance of teeth restored with dentin-bonded crowns
9. Effect of cement film thickness on the fracture resistance of a machinable glass–ceramic10.1016/0109-5641(94)90028-0 ↗
10. Microtensile bond strength of luting cements to prefabricated CAD/CAM ceramic and composite blocks10.1016/S0109-5641(02)00107-0 ↗
11. Shear bond strength of resin bonded ceramic after different try-in procedures10.1016/0300-5712(94)90012-4 ↗
12. Bond strengths of immoral porcelain repair materials10.1016/0022-3913(89)90133-9 ↗
13. Attempted evaluation of three porcelain repair systems—what are we really testing?10.1046/j.1365-2842.1998.00283.x ↗
14. Shear vs. tensile bond strength of resin composite bonded to ceramic10.1177/00220345950740091401 ↗
15. The effect of local interfacial geometry on the measurement of the tensile bond strength to dentin10.1177/00220345910700050501 ↗
16. Tensile properties of mineralized and demineralized human and bovine dentin10.1177/00220345940730061201 ↗
17. Relationship between surface area for adhesion and tensile bond strength-evaluation of a micro-tensile bond test10.1016/0109-5641(94)90067-1 ↗
18. The microtensile bond test: a review
19. A critique of bond strength measurements10.1016/0300-5712(89)90131-0 ↗
20. Effects of surface treatment are bonding agents on bond strength of composite resin to porcelain10.1016/0022-3913(93)90004-8 ↗
21. Effects of treatment and storage; conditions on ceramic/composite bond strength
22. Evaluation of porcelain surface treatments and agents for composite-to-porcelain repair10.1016/S0022-3913(96)90294-2 ↗
23. Effect of ceramic surface treatments on the bond of four resin luting agents to a ceramic material10.1016/S0022-3913(98)70170-2 ↗
24. Effects of surface treatments on shear bond strengths between a resin cement and an alumina core10.1016/S0022-3913(00)70063-1 ↗
25. Effect of porcelain surface treatments on bond strengths of composite resin bonded to porcelain10.1016/0022-3913(94)90553-3 ↗
26. Porcelain laminate veneers bonded to etched enamel10.1016/S0011-8532(22)02282-0 ↗
27. Etched porcelain veneers: the current state of the art
28. Effect of porcelain surface treatment on the bond to composite10.1016/0022-3913(88)90270-3 ↗
29. Effect of etching and sandblasting on bond strength to sintered porcelain of unfilled resin10.1046/j.1365-2842.2000.00489.x ↗
30. SEM evaluation of etch patterns by three etchants on three porcelains10.1016/0022-3913(90)90307-X ↗
31. Bonding porcelain teeth to acrylic resin denture bases10.1016/S0002-8177(67)44028-8 ↗
32. Bond strength of a resin cement to a cured composite inlay material10.1016/0022-3913(94)90079-5 ↗
33. Dentin bond strength and marginal adaptation: direct composite resins vs. ceramic inlays
34. Microtensile strength of composite bonded to hot-pressed ceramics
35. The influence of cross-sectional shape and surface area on the microtensile bond test10.1016/S0109-5641(98)00034-7 ↗