Effect of polydopamine coating on adhesion of resin composite to polyetherketoneketone (PEKK)
Source abstract
Abstract
Statement of problem Polydopamine (PD) adsorbs on all kinds of surfaces by forming strong covalent bonds , and develops cohesive strength through self-polymerization, resulting on thin strong adhesive films. Thus, PD coating could be promising to improve the adhesion to the inert Polyetherketoneketone (PEKK). Purpose To analyze different protocols of PD coating to improve gingiva veneering resin composite bonding to PEKK. Material and methods Milled PEKK specimens were fabricated and ultrasonically cleaned. Dopamine hydrochloride (Sigma Aldrich) was mixed with TRIS-HCl buffer (Sigma Aldrich) at pH 8.5 to obtain concentration of 1, 2, and 4 mg/mL. Each concentration was applied for 7 and 14 h to coating PEKK surface. Controls groups without treatment, surface treatment (with and without air abrasion), and bonding treatment (PEKKBond (AnaxDent)) were used for comparisons (n = 36 each). Morphological topography was analyzed, and flowable gingiva colored composite resin (AnaxGum, Anaxdent) were bonded to PEKK surface. Specimens were aged for 24 h (37 °C) and the shear bond strength (SBS) was assessed in universal test machine (MPa). Statistical analysis was performed by using 2-way ANOVA followed by Tukey`s tests (α = 0.05). Results All main effects and interactions were significant ( P < .05). In general, PD coating reduced the adhesion between PEKK and veneering composite ( P < .001), regardless of the concentration or the time of application ( P > .05). The conventional adhesive (PEKKBond) presented the highest SBS values, regardless prior to air abrasion treatment. Conclusion The PD coating of PEKK does not improve the bond strength between gingiva veneering composite and PEKK. Clinical implications Surface conditioning of PEKK surface properties is of interest to the dental community and, therefore, many treatments have been suggested to increase the adhesiveness of such polymer. However, PD coating is not an efficient bonding agent for PEKK and should not be used in a clinical practice since it is time-consuming and reduces the adhesion to PEKK.
Source: expertdata · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Dental materials and restorations · Polymer Surface Interaction Studies · Surgical Sutures and Adhesives
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (27)
Show source-provided references
1. Tensile bond strength of veneering resins to PEEK: impact of different adhesives10.4012/dmj.2013-011 ↗
2. Resin bonding to three types of polyaryletherketones (PAEKs)-durability and influence of surface conditioning10.1016/j.dental.2013.12.008 ↗
3. The effect of different surface pretreatments on the bond strength of veneering resin to polyetheretherketone10.1080/01694243.2018.1468534 ↗
4. Polyetheretherketone-a suitable material for fixed dental prostheses?10.1002/jbm.b.32932 ↗
5. The effect of different surface treatments on the bond strength of PEEK composite materials10.1016/j.dental.2014.03.011 ↗
6. Bonding behaviour of polyetherketoneketone to methylmethacrylate- and dimethacrylate-based polymers
7. Effect of different surface pre-treatments and luting materials on shear bond strength to PEEK10.1016/j.dental.2010.02.003 ↗
8. Shear bond strength between veneering composite and PEEK after different surface modifications10.1007/s00784-014-1294-2 ↗
9. Effect of different surface pretreatments and adhesives on the load-bearing capacity of veneered 3-unit PEEK FDPs10.1016/j.prosdent.2015.06.006 ↗
10. Effect of surface pretreatments on resin composite bonding to PEEK10.4012/dmj.2015-349 ↗
11. The impact of non-thermal plasma on the adhesion of polyetherketoneketone (PEKK) to a veneering composite system
12. Influence of PEEK surface modification on surface properties and bond strength to veneering resin composites
13. Applications of polyetheretherketone (PEEK) in oral implantology and prosthodontics10.1016/j.jpor.2015.10.001 ↗
14. Adhesion to high-performance polymers applied in dentistry: a systematic review10.1016/j.dental.2020.01.002 ↗
15. The effects of surface treatments on tensile bond strength of polyether-ketone-ketone (PEKK) to veneering resin10.1016/j.jmbbm.2019.01.015 ↗
16. Adhesion properties of self-polymerized dopamine thin film10.2174/1876531901103010115 ↗
17. Single-molecule mechanics of mussel adhesion10.1073/pnas.0605552103 ↗
18. Mussel-inspired adhesives and coatings10.1146/annurev-matsci-062910-100429 ↗
19. Effect on the bond strengths of glass fiber posts functionalized with polydopamine after etching with hydrogen peroxide10.4012/dmj.2014-259 ↗
20. Combination of polydopamine coating and plasma pretreatment to improve bond ability between PEEK and primary teeth
21. Effect of zirconia surface modification using dopamine polymerisation on the shear bond strength of resin cement10.1111/eos.12797 ↗
22. Surface treatments to improve the repair of acrylic and bis-acryl provisional materials
23. Comparative evaluation of shear bond strength of two different chairside soft liners to heat processed acrylic denture base resin: an in vitro study10.4103/0975-7406.191948 ↗
24. A critical evaluation of bond strength tests for the assessment of bonding to Y-TZP10.1016/j.dental.2015.03.002 ↗
25. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of the shear bond test10.1016/0109-5641(95)80047-6 ↗
26. Effect of testing methods on the bond strength of resin to zirconia-alumina ceramic: microtensile versus shear test10.4012/dmj.27.849 ↗
27. Direct comparison of the bond strength results of the different test methods: a critical literature review10.1016/j.dental.2009.12.002 ↗