Using auxiliary adherends to eliminate need for grain control in fracture testing of adhesively bonded wood
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Proper crack growth in the investigation of adhesive failure in bonded wood joints requires laborious grain control. By adding auxiliary adherends, this paper introduces and evaluates a novel sample geometry that enables fracture energy characterization of wood veneer-adhesive systems. The proposed method was applied to three wood species to test three commonly used wood adhesives. The proposed sample geometry successfully identified differences in fracture energies associated with the use of different adhesives on the same wood species and offered comparable success rate as grain control method. More importantly, for sawn and planed veneers that were without lathe checks common in rotary-peeled veneers, the success rate was even higher than that of rotary peeled veneers, indicating the significance of our proposed method to wood adhesion. We further explored the effects of crack propagation both parallel and perpendicular to wood grain orientation and designed wax strip specimens to understand rising R-curve behavior observed in certain species.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Wood Treatment and Properties · Mechanical Behavior of Composites · Infrastructure Maintenance and Monitoring
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (24)
Show source-provided references
1. 1999
2. Mixed mode fracture testing of adhesively bonded wood specimens using a dual actuator load frame10.1515/hf.2010.041 ↗
3. Effects of systematic variation of wood adherend bending stiffness on fracture properties: Part 1. Influence of grain angle10.1515/hf-2011-0160 ↗
4. Characterization of mixed-mode I/II fracture properties of adhesively bonded yellow-poplar by a dual actuator test frame instrument10.1515/hf-2011-0171 ↗
5. Specific fracture energy at glue joints in European beech wood10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2015.03.007 ↗
6. Tapered double cantilever beam fracture Tests of phenolic-wood adhesive joints .1. Development of specimen geometry - Effects of bondline thickness, wood Anisotropy and cure Time on fracture energy
7. An analysis of the crack tip stress field in DCB adhesive fracture specimens10.1007/BF00032383 ↗
8. On the stress distribution at the base of a stationary crack10.1115/1.4011454 ↗
9. Slightly curved or kinked cracks10.1007/BF00012619 ↗
10. Crack path selection in a brittle adhesive layer10.1016/0020-7683(91)90069-R ↗
11. The effect of the T-stress on crack path selection in adhesively bonded joints10.1016/S0143-7496(01)00011-2 ↗
12. Numerical analysis of directionally unstable crack propagation in adhesively bonded joints10.1016/S0020-7683(01)00006-3 ↗
13. Crack path selection in adhesively-bonded joints: the role of material properties10.1080/00218460108029613 ↗
14. Crack path selection in adhesively bonded joints: the roles of external loads and speciment geometry10.1023/A:1015020919823 ↗
15. Anderson · 2005
16. The fracture toughness of medium density fiberboard (MDF) including the effects of fiber bridging and crack-plane interference10.1016/j.engfracmech.2009.04.007 ↗
17. Tomppo, L., Novel Applications of electrical Impedance and ultrasound Methods for wood quality assessment. 2013, University of Eastern Finland.
18. Douglas-fir plywood gluebond quality as influenced by veneer roughness, lathe checks, and annual ring characteristics
19. Lathe check characteristics of fast growing sengon veneers and their effect on LVL glue-bond and bending strength10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2014.08.015 ↗
20. 2009
21. The calculation of adhesive fracture energies from double-cantilever beam test specimens10.1007/BF00735649 ↗
22. London, I.C. Test Protocols Linear elastic fracture mechanics test protocols [cited 2018 May 18th ].
23. Fracture of discontinuous wood-adhesive bonds10.1016/S0143-7496(02)00080-5 ↗
24. Characterizing fracture performance and the interaction of propagating cracks with locally weakened interfaces in adhesive joints10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2017.12.006 ↗