Bonding of facial silicon with nanoparticles to an acrylic resin substrate
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract The aim of this study was to evaluate the influence of different adhesive techniques and accelerated aging on the bonding of maxillofacial biomedical silicone to an acrylic resin substrate. 960 acrylic resin samples (PMMA) were manufactured and bonded to the silicone with or without oil painting and/or opacifier. Both materials were bonded through mechanical retentions and/or application of primers (DC 1205 primer and Sofreliner primer S) and adhesive (Silastic Medical Adhesive Type A) or not (control group). The samples dimension were 75-mm length, 10-mm width and 6-mm thickness.The samples were divided in 4 groups ( n =240) for the pigmentation variable, and 12 subgroups ( n =20) accordingly to the bonding technique. Half of the samples of each group underwent the peel test at baseline and the fracture pattern was measured through direct observation and SEM and then classified into adhesive, cohesive and both failure. The remaining samples were submitted to accelerated aging (8 hours – ultraviolet light irradiance was at a temperature of 60±3 °C and 4 h – a dark condensation period was at a temperature of 45±3 °C) during 1008 hours and the peel test, direct observation and SEM were performed. The peel value needed to separate the resin from silicone (PS) was statistically analyzed with the ANOVA variance test and the Tukey test ( p p n =671=69.9%) and the least common was the cohesive one ( n =109). Greater PS values were presented by the subgroups pigmented with oil painting, without scratches and that received the sofreliner primer after the accelerated aging period. The sofreliner primer promotes a higher adherence between acrylic resin and facial silicone and the incidence rate of both failure augmented after the aging period.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Reconstructive Facial Surgery Techniques · Facial Trauma and Fracture Management · Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (29)
Show source-provided references
1. Craniofacial implants success in facial rehabilitation10.1097/SCS.0b013e3181f7b702 ↗
2. Effects of bond primers on bending strength and bonding of glass fibers in fiber-embedded maxillofacial silicone prostheses10.1111/j.1532-849X.2010.00653.x ↗
3. The effects of primers and surface bonding characteristics on the adhesion of polyurethane to two commonly used silicone elastomers10.1111/j.1532-849X.2008.00371.x ↗
4. Bonding of maxillofacial silicone elastomers to an acrylic substrate10.1016/j.dental.2010.01.001 ↗
5. Implant-supported facial prostheses provided by a maxillofacial unit in a U.K. regional hospital: longevity and patient opinions10.1111/j.1532-849X.2005.00004.x ↗
6. Bonding of silicone prosthetic elastomers to three different denture resins
7. Bonding of silicone extra-oral elastomers to acrylic resin: the effect of primer composition
8. Goiato · Implant-retained thumb prosthesis with anti-rotational attachment for a geriatric patient Gerodontology · 2010 · 27 · 243
9. Retention systems to implant-supported craniofacial prostheses10.1097/SCS.0b013e3181a14bcb ↗
10. Effect of test method on the bond strength of a silicone resilient denture lining material10.1016/S0022-3913(96)90014-1 ↗
11. Adhesive bond strength and compliance for denture soft lining materials10.1016/S0142-9612(01)00253-8 ↗
12. Outdoor and accelerated weathering of acrylonitrile-butadiene-styrene: a correlation study10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2013.07.016 ↗
13. Visual evaluation of color stability after accelerated aging of pigmented and nonpigmented silicones to be used in facial prostheses10.4103/0970-9290.49073 ↗
14. Influence of pigment and opacifier on dimensional stability and detail reproduction of maxillofacial silicone elastomer10.1097/SCS.0b013e31822e5ef2 ↗
15. Color stability of maxillofacial silicone with nanoparticle pigment and opacifier submitted to disinfection and artificial aging10.1117/1.3625401 ↗
16. Effects of pigment, disinfection, and accelerated aging on the hardness and deterioration of a facial silicone elastomer10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2012.06.033 ↗
17. Implant-retained digital prostheses with custom-designed attachments: a clinical report10.1016/j.prosdent.2007.02.008 ↗
18. Surgical versus prosthetic reconstruction of microtia: the case for prosthetic reconstruction10.1016/j.joms.2006.03.050 ↗
19. Bond strength between acrylic resin and maxillofacial silicone10.1590/S1678-77572012000600010 ↗
20. Urethane-lined silicone facial prostheses10.1016/0022-3913(87)90056-4 ↗
21. Locking retentive attachment for an implant-retained auricular prosthesis10.1067/mpr.2002.122016 ↗
22. Effect of addition of pigments and opacifier on the hardness, absorption, solubility and surface degradation of facial silicone after artificial ageing10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2012.05.033 ↗
23. American Society for Testing Materials: Standard test for peel resistence, D1876, West Conshohocken, PA, ASTM; 2001.
24. Effects of accelerated artificial daylight aging on bending strength and bonding of glass fibers in fiber-embedded maxillofacial silicone prostheses10.1111/j.1532-849X.2010.00584.x ↗
25. Marginal deterioration of the silicone for facial prosthesis with pigments after effect of storage period and chemical disinfection10.1097/SCS.0b013e3181c46bfc ↗
26. Anusavice · 2003
27. Hardness evaluation of prosthetic silicones containing opacifiers following chemical disinfection and accelerated aging10.1590/S1806-83242010000300008 ↗
28. Agency for toxic substances and disease registry (ATSDR). Toxicological Profile for methylene chloride; 2000.
29. Photoelastic analysis of stress distribution in different retention systems for facial prosthesis10.1097/SCS.0b013e3181a28a96 ↗