journal article·2024-05

The applicability of stripe light projection data to the determination of fractal dimensions of blast-cleaned steel surfaces

T. Marquardt, A. Krenz, A.W. Momber, S. Buchbach

Publisher page

Abstract

This paper is concerned with the assessment of fractal dimensions of blast-cleaned steel substrates using stripe line projection on 12 surface configurations. By means of the box-counting method and a Design of Experiment (DoE) approach, the factors abrasive type, surface preparation grade, surface roughness, and measurement direction were analyzed. The results revealed that the factor surface roughness contributed 52.5 % to the fractal dimensions. The factor measurement direction contributed 14.7 % (even up to 20 % once interactions were included) to the fractal dimension. Particularly the profile “formation” values were significantly influenced by the factor measurement direction, with contributions ranging up to 17.2 %. The potential limitations on the optical stripe light projection in capturing variations in fractal dimensions, especially in the abscissa-direction (formation), are highlighted. Whereas the box-counting method offers valuable insights, the stripe line projection introduces variations in the derived fractal dimensions. Stripe line projection shall be carefully considered when applied to fractal analysis.
Source: expertdata · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Surface Roughness and Optical Measurements · Theoretical and Computational Physics · Laser-induced spectroscopy and plasma

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (29)

Show source-provided references
1. Momber · 2008
2. Classified substrate roughness parameters of blast-cleaned steel substrates and their effects on fractal dimensions10.1080/01694243.2022.2071045 ↗
3. Fractal dimensions of blast-cleaned steel surfaces and their effects on the adhesion of polymeric foil systems with integrated pressure-sensitive adhesives10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2022.103198 ↗
4. The determination of fractal dimensions of blast-cleaned steel substrates by means of comparative cross section image analysis and contact stylus instrument measurements10.1080/01694243.2022.2118567 ↗
5. Effect of grit blasting and spraying angle on the adhesion strength of a plasma-sprayed coating10.1361/10599630421406 ↗
6. Fractal analysis of surfaces roughened by grit blasting10.1163/156856100742096 ↗
7. Introducing fractal dimension for interlaminar shear and tensile strength assessment of mechanically interlocked polymer-metal interfaces10.3390/ma13092171 ↗
8. Surface characteristics and corrosion behavior of carbon steel treated by abrasive blasting10.3390/met11122065 ↗
9. The assessment of fractal dimensions with the direct use of scanning electron microscopy (SEM) images from blast-cleaned steel substrates10.1080/01694243.2021.2013057 ↗
10. Image analysis measurements of roughness by texture and fractal analysis correlate with contact profilometry10.1016/S0142-9612(02)00524-0 ↗
11. Fractal-based description of the roughness of blasted steel panels
12. Dependence of adhesion strength of an acrylic clear coat on fractal dimension of abrasive blasted surfaces using image processing
13. Bond behavior between CFRP and corroded steel plate associations with surface treatments
14. A novel approach for the detection of geometric and weight-related FSW tool wear using stripe light projection
15. The corrosion of carbon steel under delaminating repair coatings after long‐term marine splash zone exposure10.1002/maco.202112942 ↗
16. Influence of roughness on surface scanning by means of a laser stripe system10.1007/s00170-008-1794-9 ↗
17. Pitting corrosion in the wet section of the automotive exhaust systems
18. 2018
19. 2020
20. 2018
21. 2018
22. 2018
23. 2018
24. 2016
25. 1998
26. Falconer · 2014
27. Hotar · 2014
28. 2007
29. Garcia-Diaz · 1994