Does acid etching prior to applying universal adhesives affect the bond strength of glass fiber post to root dentin?
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract The aim of this study was to evaluate if acid etching prior to application of different universal adhesives influences the bond strength of the glass fiber post to root dentin. One hundred and twenty (120) bovine-tooth roots were prepared to receive glass fiber posts #3 (White Post, FGM) and then divided into 12 groups (n = 10) according to two factors: the adhesive system (Single Bond Universal, Ambar Universal, Prime & Bond Universal, Gluma Bond Universal, YBond Universal or Ambar Universal APS); and acid etching prior to application of the adhesive (presence or absence). After cementation, the specimens were stored in a humid environment at 37 °C for 24 h. Each sample was sectioned into 5 slices with 1.5 ± 0.2 mm thickness and subjected to a pushout test with an increasing load of 1 mm/min in a universal testing machine until failure and the data were analyzed using two-way ANOVA and post-hoc Tukey's tests. There was no statistical difference in the bond strength values for the acid etching factor. There were only differences for the adhesive system factor. Higher bond strength values were found for the Universal Single Bond adhesive (3 M) regardless of acid etching or not, and for Gluma Bond Universal adhesive without acid etching. It was possible to conclude that acid etching prior to applying the universal adhesives used in this study does not influence the bond strength of glass fiber posts to root dentin.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Dental materials and restorations · Endodontics and Root Canal Treatments · Dental Trauma and Treatments
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (37)
Show source-provided references
1. Biomechanical considerations in restoring endodontically treated teeth10.1016/0022-3913(94)90438-3 ↗
2. Mechanical properties and in vitro studies
3. Ferrari · 2002
4. Freilich · 2000
5. State of the art of self-etch adhesives10.1016/j.dental.2010.10.023 ↗
6. Immediate bonding properties of universal adhesives to dentine10.1016/j.jdent.2013.03.001 ↗
7. Bond strength of universal adhesives: a systematic review and meta-analysis10.1016/j.jdent.2015.04.003 ↗
8. Effect of mode of application on the microtensile bond strength of a self-etch and etch-and-rinse adhesive system10.2341/09-319-L ↗
9. Comparison of intra- and inter tooth resin-dentin bond strength variability
10. State of the art etch-and-rinse adhesives10.1016/j.dental.2010.10.016 ↗
11. Systematic review of the chemical composition of contemporary dental adhesives10.1016/j.biomaterials.2007.04.044 ↗
12. Buonocore memorial lecture. Adhesion to enamel and dentin: current status and future challenges
13. Bonding performance of universal adhesives in different etching modes10.1016/j.jdent.2014.04.012 ↗
14. Do universal adhesives promote bonding to dentin? A systematic review and meta-analysis10.5395/rde.2018.43.e29 ↗
15. Adhesive dentistry and endodontics. Part 2: bonding in the root canal system—the promise and the problems: a review10.1016/j.joen.2006.08.003 ↗
16. Dentin bonding: effect of degree of mineralization and acid etching time
17. Effect of operator experience on the outcome of fiber post cementation with different resin cements10.2341/11-494-L ↗
18. Effect of dentin moisture and application mode of universal adhesives on the adhesion of glass fiber posts to root canal
19. Effects of dentin moisture on cementation of fiber posts to root canals
20. Push-out bond strength of fiber posts to intraradicular dentin using multimode adhesive system10.1016/j.joen.2016.08.025 ↗
21. Bonding properties of universal adhesives to root canals prepared with different rotary instruments10.1016/j.prosdent.2018.02.013 ↗
22. Bond stability of universal adhesives applied to dentin using etch-and-rinse or self-etch strategies10.1590/0103-6440201902578 ↗
23. Universal adhesives: setting characteristics and reactivity with dentin10.3390/ma12101720 ↗
24. Performance of a universal adhesive on etched and non-etched surfaces: do the results match the expectations?10.1016/j.msec.2016.04.022 ↗
25. Bonding performance of universal adhesives: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis
26. Self-assembled nano-layering at the adhesive interface10.1177/0022034512437375 ↗
27. Nanolayering of phosphoric acid ester monomer on enamel and dentin10.1016/j.actbio.2011.04.026 ↗
28. Universal adhesives10.1111/jerd.12185 ↗
29. Functional monomer impurity affects adhesive performance10.1016/j.dental.2015.09.019 ↗
30. De Munck J, Vargas M, Iracki J, Van Landuyt K, Poitevin A, Lambrechts P, et al, One-day bonding effectiveness of new self-etch adhesives to bur-cut enamel and dentin. Oper Dent n.d.;30:39–49.
31. Effect of smear layer thickness and pH of self-etching adhesive systems on the bond strength and gap formation to dentin
32. Continuing etching of an all-in-one adhesive in wet dentin tubules10.1177/154405910508400411 ↗
33. Testing mode and surface treatment effects on dentin bonding10.1002/(SICI)1097-4636(199612)32:4<533::AID-JBM6>3.0.CO;2-S ↗
34. Resin-dentin interfaces of endodontically-treated restored teeth
35. Comparison of microtensile bond strength and resin–dentin interfaces of two self‐adhesive flowable composite resins by using different universal adhesives: Scanning electron microscope study10.1002/jemt.23250 ↗
36. Technical profile Ambar Universal
37. GLUMA Bond Universal: Scientific information