Microtensile bond strength of silorane or methacrylate resin-based composites associated to self-etching or conventional adhesives to dentin after different storage times
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Objectives The aim of this study was to evaluate the bond strength of methacrylate-based (Filtek Z350-3M/ESPE) or silorane-based (Filtek P90-3M/ESPE) resin composites associated with self-etching adhesive systems (Adper SE Plus-3M/ESPE, Adper P90-3M/ESPE and Clearfil SE Bond-Kuraray) or with a conventional adhesive system (Scotchbond MultiUso-3M/ESPE) to dentin after 24 h and 180 days storage times, and also to determine the fracture pattern. Materials and methods The occlusal enamel was removed from 48 recently extracted impacted third molars to expose the superficial dentin. The teeth were divided into eight groups (n=6) according to the adhesive system applied and to the resin composite used for block fabrication. The specimens were cut into sticks with an area of approximately 1 mm² and separated into two groups according to storage time in distilled water (24 h or 180 days). The test specimens were subjected to microtensile bond strength tests in a universal testing machine (EMIC) at a speed of 0.5 mm/min. The results were analyzed by the three-factor analysis of variance and the Tukey test. Results No significant difference was found between “24 h” and “180 days” storage times for any resin and adhesive system evaluated (p=0.9113). The Filtek P90 and Filtek Z350 resin composites showed no statistical differences in the mean microtensile bond strength values, in the different associations with the adhesive systems assessed (p=0.28). There were significant differences in microtensile bond strength mean values between the Filtek P90 and Filtek Z350 resin composites when these were used with the same type of adhesive system (p=0.02). It was observed that higher bond strength values were obtained when Filtek Z350 resin composite was used. There was a predominance of adhesive fractures in all groups tested after 24 h, except for Filtek Z350 resin associated with Scotchbond MultiUso adhesive, and for Filtek P90 associated with Adper SE Bond system, in which case there was predominance of the mixed fracture type. After 180 days, Filtek P90 resin associated with the Adper SE Bond system presented 100% mixed fractures, whereas a larger number of adhesive fractures were obtained in the other groups. Conclusions The methacrylate-based resin presented higher bond strength values than the silorane-based resin. The association of resin P90 with Adper SE Plus adhesive is not recommended. The other associations presented similar bond strength values among one another.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Dental materials and restorations · Dental Research and COVID-19 · Dental Erosion and Treatment
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (36)
Show source-provided references
1. Immediate performance of self-etching versus system adhesives with multiple light-activated restoratives10.1016/j.dental.2004.04.003 ↗
2. Comparative SEM evaluation of penetration of adhesive systems in human dentin with a non-rinse conditioner and a self-etching primer10.1590/S0103-64402004000100004 ↗
3. Hydrolytic stability of self-etch adhesives bonded to dentin10.1177/154405910508401213 ↗
4. Effect of dentin conditioners on the microtensile bond strength of a conventional and self-etching primer adhesive system10.1016/j.dental.2003.12.004 ↗
5. Self-etch vs etch-and-rinse adhesives: effect of thermo-mechanical fatigue loading on marginal quality of bonded resin composite restorations10.1016/j.dental.2004.07.005 ↗
6. Morphological evaluation of 2- and 1 step self-etching system interfaces with dentin10.2341/05-145 ↗
7. Dentin regional bond strength of self-etch and total-etch adhesive systems10.1016/j.dental.2007.02.001 ↗
8. Tensile bond strength of self-etching versus total-etching adhesive systems under different dentinal substrate conditions10.1590/S1806-83242007000100014 ↗
9. Bonding durability of single-step adhesives to previously acid-etched dentin10.2341/08-26 ↗
10. Comparison of enamel and dentin microshear bond strengths of a two-step self-etching priming system with five all-in-one systems10.2341/07-125 ↗
11. Effect of long-term water storage on etch-and-rinse and self-etching resin–dentin bond strengths
12. Microtensile bond strength of one—and two- step self-etching adhesives on sclerotic dentin: the effects of thermocycling10.2341/10-025-L ↗
13. Ultrastructural correlates of in vivo/in vitro bond degradation in self-etch adhesives10.1177/154405910508400412 ↗
14. The effect of load cycling on nanoleakage of deproteinized resin/dentin interfaces as a function of time10.1016/j.dental.2007.11.005 ↗
15. Siloranes in dental composites10.1016/j.dental.2004.10.007 ↗
16. Microleakage evaluation of silorane based composite versus methacrylate based composite10.4103/0972-0707.71649 ↗
17. Fracture resistance of teeth restored with different resin-based restorative systems10.1590/S1806-83242012005000004 ↗
18. The influence of short and medium- term water immersion on the hydrolytic stability of novel low-shrink dental composites10.1016/j.dental.2005.01.004 ↗
19. In vitro cuspal deflection and microleakage of maxillary premolars restored with novel low-shrink dental composites10.1016/j.dental.2004.05.005 ↗
20. Comparison between a silorane-based composite and methacrylate-based composites: shrinkage characteristics, thermal properties, gel point and vitrification point10.4012/dmj.2011-147 ↗
21. Properties of silorane-based dental resins and composites containing a stress-reducing monomer10.1016/j.dental.2006.09.002 ↗
22. Two year clinical evaluation of a low-shrink resin composite material in UK general dental practices10.1016/j.dental.2011.02.012 ↗
23. Marginal adaptation of a low-shrinkage silorane-based composite: 1-year randomized clinical trial10.1007/s00784-010-0446-2 ↗
24. Clinical evaluation of a low-shrinkage composite in posterior restorations: one-year results10.2341/11-179-C ↗
25. Microtensile bond strength of a new silorane-based composite resin adhesive
26. Long-term durability of one-step adhesive-composite systems to enamel and dentin10.2341/07-166 ↗
27. Microtensile bond strength of new self-adhesive luting agents and conventional multistep systems10.1016/S0022-3913(09)60180-3 ↗
28. Comparative evaluation of bond strength of three contemporary self-etch adhesives: an ex vivo study10.4103/0976-237X.83068 ↗
29. Adhesives with different pHs: effect on the MTBS of chemically activated and light- activated composites to human dentin10.1590/S1678-77572007000400005 ↗
30. Effect of cyclic loading on the bond strength of class II restorations with different composite materials10.2341/07-65 ↗
31. The microtensile bond test: a review
32. Polymerization stress, shrinkage and elastic modulus of current low-shrinkage restorative composites10.1016/j.dental.2010.08.003 ↗
33. Investigating filler morphology and properties of new low-shrinkage resin composites types10.1111/j.1365-2842.2010.02066.x ↗
34. Contraction stress of low-shrinkage composite materials assessed with different testing systems10.1016/j.dental.2010.05.007 ↗
35. Comparison of silorane and methacrylate-based composite resins on the curing light transmission10.1590/S0103-64402010000600010 ↗
36. Investigation of mechanical properties of modern dental composites after artificial aging for one year10.2341/09-337-L ↗