journal article·2016-07

Experimental method for the determination of material parameters of plasticity models for toughened adhesives

A. Chiminelli, R. Breto, M.A. Jiménez, F. Velasco, J. Abenojar, M.A Martínez

Publisher page

Abstract

Abstract Toughened adhesives commonly present complex non-linear behaviors affecting the stress/strain distribution that develops in bonded joints under loads and, consequently, influencing their maximum load capacity. Although they can be related to different phenomena, these non-linearities are generally dominated by the plastic yield of the material. For detailed analysis of adhesive joints, these behaviors need to be adequately characterised through proper material models. In this sense, models that take into account the dependency of the yield surface and the plastic potential with the hydrostatic component of the stress tensor have been widely used with certain success in the last years. The definition of such models usually requires the execution of various experimental tests for the determination of the associated material parameters, constituting a significant cost/effort in terms of characterization. In order to minimize the amount of tests required, the present work is focused on the definition of a sequential/multiaxial test that can be carried out using a single sample giving enough information to completely determine the mentioned parameters. More concretely, the experimental procedure proposed involves torsion and tensile tests that are executed consecutively. The design of the test has been carried out using the finite element method as calculation tool and considering the exponent Drucker-Prager model. The verification of the experimental procedure proposed has been carried out for a toughened epoxy adhesive that has been characterized through conventional tensile and torsion tests in previous works.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Mechanical Behavior of Composites · Structural Load-Bearing Analysis · Metal Forming Simulation Techniques

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (24)

Show source-provided references
1. Crocker · 2003
2. Joint strength predictions for adhesive joints to be used over a wide temperature range10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2006.09.007 ↗
3. Standard finite element techniques for efficient stress analysis of adhesive joints10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2008.01.005 ↗
4. Single lap joints loaded in tension with high strength steel adherends10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2013.01.016 ↗
5. Single lap joints loaded in tension with ductile steel adherends10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2013.01.017 ↗
6. Experimental and numerical analysis of single-lap joints for the automotive industry10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2008.09.001 ↗
7. Techniques to reduce the peel stresses in adhesive joints with composites10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2006.04.001 ↗
8. Numerical analysis of edge effects in adhesively-bonded assemblies application to the determination of the adhesive behaviour10.1016/j.compstruc.2008.02.003 ↗
9. Prediction of deformation and failure of rubber-toughened adhesive joints10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2003.08.002 ↗
10. Analysis of the influence of hydrostatic stress on the behaviour of an adhesive in a bonded assembly10.1163/016942410X507696 ↗
11. Effect of adhesive type and thickness on the lap shear strength10.1080/00218460600948511 ↗
12. Simulation of strength difference in elasto-plasticity for adhesive materials10.1002/nme.1315 ↗
13. Implementation, identification and validation of an elasto-plastic-damage model for the finite element simulation of structural bonded joints10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2014.01.020 ↗
14. Characterization and modelling of the 3D elastic–plastic behaviour of an adhesively bonded joint under monotonic tension/compression-shear loads: influence of three cure cycles10.1080/01694243.2012.701528 ↗
15. Characterization and material model definition of toughened adhesives for finite element analysis10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2010.12.006 ↗
16. Dean G, Crocker L. The use of finite element methods for design with adhesives, UK Materials Centre, National Physical Laboratory Report; 2001.
17. Dean GD, Read BE, Duncan BC. An evaluation of yield criteria for adhesives for finite element analysis, UK Materials Centre, National Physical Laboratory Report; 1999.
18. ABAQUS Documentation v.6.13. Dassault Systèmes; 2013.
19. Crocker Louise E, Dean Greg D. Predicting the Deformation Behaviour of Cavitating Materials, National Physical Laboratory, ABAQUS Users’ Conference; 2005.
20. Predicting the residual strength for environmentally degraded adhesive lap joints10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2005.04.003 ↗
21. ASM Handbook. Volume 8. Mechanical testing and evaluation, Fundamental Aspects of Torsional Loading; 2000.
22. Dean · 1996
23. de Castro J. Experiments on Epoxy, Polyurethane and ADP Adhesives. Composite Construction Laboratory. École Polytechnique Fédérale de Laussane; 2005.
24. Construction and validation tests of a torsion test machine10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2006.03.099 ↗