Long-term bond strength of glass fiber post to composite resin does not depend on surface treatment with silane coupling agent or universal adhesive
Source abstract
Abstract
This study evaluated the effect of glass fiber post (GFP) surface treatment with or without a silane coupling agent, associated with adhesive systems with or without silane in their composition, on the long-term bond strength to resin composite. Sixty GFPs (Whitepost DC no. 2, FGM) were cleaned using 70% ethanol, and randomly divided into two groups, either with or without pretreatment with silane (Ceramic Primer, 3 M ESPE), for 60 s. Each group was further subdivided into three groups, according to the adhesive system applied over the GFP (n = 10): UAS (Scotchbond Universal, 3 M ESPE), E&R – etch-and-rinse adhesive system (Adper Single Bond Plus, 3 M ESPE), and a control group with no adhesive system. The GFPs were centralized in a cylindrical matrix, and a nanoparticulate resin composite (Filtek Supreme Ultra, 3 M ESPE) was inserted and photoactivated. After 48 h, the samples were sectioned in slices, two of which were immediately (48 h) submitted to the push-out bond strength test, and another two, after 6 months of storage in water. The failure mode was evaluated with a stereomicroscope under 40× magnification, and classified using scores. Three-way ANOVA (α = 0.05) showed that the triple interaction of pretreatment with silane, use of adhesive and time period were significant (p = 0.019). After 48 h, the application of silane resulted in a significant increase in bond strength values, regardless of the adhesive application (p = 0.013), but this effect was no longer observed after 6 months (p = 0.677). Application of UAS did not influence bond strength values, regardless of silane application or storage time (p > 0.05). As for E&R, significantly higher bond strength was observed after 6 months, compared with 48 h (p = 0.040). When post silanization was performed with no adhesive system, there was no difference in bond strength between 48 h and 6 months storage time (p > 0.05). When there was neither silanization, nor an adhesive system, a significantly higher bond strength was observed after 6 months, compared with 48 h (p < 0.05). Most of the failure types were classified as mixed in both of the water storage time periods. The long-term bond strength of the GFP to composite resin did not depend on post surface treatment with silane, or application of either a UAS or a E&R system.
Source: expertdata · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Dental materials and restorations · Dental Implant Techniques and Outcomes · Dental Research and COVID-19
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (21)
Show source-provided references
1. Current perspectives on post systems: a literature review10.1111/j.1834-7819.2010.01298.x ↗
2. Randomized controlled trial comparing glass fiber posts and cast metal posts10.1016/j.jdent.2020.103334 ↗
3. The effect of dowel space on the bond strengths of fiber posts10.1111/j.1532-849X.2006.00166.x ↗
4. Influence of alveolar bone loss and cement layer thickness on the biomechanical behavior of endodontically treated maxillary incisors: a 3-dimensional finite element analysis10.1016/j.joen.2016.11.020 ↗
5. Influence of oversized dowel space preparation on the bond strengths of FRC posts10.2341/08-53 ↗
6. Root reinforcement with a resin-bonded preformed post10.1016/S0022-3913(97)70081-7 ↗
7. Do mechanical advantages exist in relining fiber posts with composite prior to its cementation?
8. The influence of customization of glass fiber posts on fracture strength and failure pattern: a systematic review and meta-analysis of preclinical ex-vivo studies10.1016/j.jmbbm.2021.104433 ↗
9. Can cement film thickness influence bond strength and fracture resistance of fiber reinforced composite posts?10.1007/s00784-015-1568-3 ↗
10. A review of failure modes in teeth restored with adhesively luted endodontic dowels10.1111/j.1532-849X.2010.00647.x ↗
11. A systematic review of factors associated with the retention of glass fiber posts
12. The adhesion between prefabricated FRC posts and composite resin cores: microtensile bond strength with and without post-silanization10.1016/j.dental.2004.07.012 ↗
13. Can silanization increase the retention of glass-fiber posts? A systematic review and meta-analysis of in vitro studies10.2341/14-330-O ↗
14. Surface treatments for improving bond strength to prefabricated fiber posts: a literature review10.2341/07-86 ↗
15. Effect of silane-containing universal adhesive on push-out bond strength of glass fiber post to composite resin and to resin cement/intraradicular dentin10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2018.02.034 ↗
16. Cohen · 1998
17. Surface treatments of a glass-fiber reinforced composite: effect on the adhesion to a composite resin10.1016/j.jpor.2019.09.001 ↗
18. Acidic pH weakens the bonding effectiveness of silane contained in universal adhesives10.1016/j.dental.2018.02.004 ↗
19. Stability and reactivity of γ-ΜPTMS silane in some commercial primer and adhesive formulations10.1016/j.dental.2018.05.006 ↗
20. Effectiveness and stability of silane coupling agent incorporated in 'universal' adhesives10.1016/j.dental.2016.07.002 ↗
21. Failure of fiber posts after cementation with different adhesives with or without silanization investigated by pullout tests and scanning electron microscopy10.1016/j.joen.2012.06.022 ↗