journal article·2018-10

Effects of bonding area size, surface treatment and specimen configuration on the push out test for assessing bonding and stress distribution to Y-TZP

Vinicius Felipe Wandscher, Ana Maria Estivalete Marchionatti, Aline Otani, César Dalmolin Bergoli, Paulo Francisco Cesar, Luiz Felipe Valandro

Publisher page

Abstract

Abstract Purpose To evaluate the influence of specimen configuration, bonding area and zirconia surface treatment on the push out bond strength to Y-TZP and on the stress distribution using finite element analysis (FEA). Materials and methods 240 Y-TZP blocks with a central perforation were assigned to 8 groups (n=30) according to the adhesive area (macro-test: 5 × 5.5 × 4 mm and micro-test: 5 × 5.5 × 1 mm), material inserted in the perforation (resin cement or composite resin) and surface treatment (silanization or tribochemical silica coating+silanization). Push-out bond strength test, failure modes evaluation and FEA were performed. Results Three-way ANOVA showed that bond strength was statistically higher for composite resin (p=0.00) and for macro specimens (p=0.00). Surface treatment significantly increased the adhesion, except for ‘resin cement macro-test’ (p=0.00). Finite element analysis showed that the stresses were more homogeneously distributed at the interface of micro-specimens. Conclusion Macro-push out with composite resin or cement does not appear to be promising when evaluating adhesion to zirconia ceramics; micro-push out with composite resin filler is an adequate method; the tribochemical silica coating surface treatment can be evaluated by all tested methods in the current study, except for the macro-test with resin cement condition.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Dental materials and restorations · Dental Implant Techniques and Outcomes · Dental Research and COVID-19

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (30)

Show source-provided references
1. Adhesion/cementation to zirconia and other non-silicate ceramics: where are we now?10.1016/j.dental.2010.10.022 ↗
2. Comparison of resin cement adhesion to Y TZP ceramic following manufacturers' instructions of the cements only10.1007/s00784-007-0151-y ↗
3. Effect of silica coating combined to a MDP-based primer on the resin bond to Y-TZP ceramic
4. A critical evaluation of bond strength tests for the assessment of bonding to Y-TZP10.1016/j.dental.2015.03.002 ↗
5. Do the microshear test variables affect the bond strength values?10.1155/2012/618960 ↗
6. Relationship between bond-strength tests and clinical outcomes10.1016/j.dental.2009.11.148 ↗
7. Do dentin bond strength tests serve a useful purpose?
8. Adhesion to tooth structure: a critical review of "micro" bond strength test methods10.1016/j.dental.2009.11.155 ↗
9. Effect of cross-sectional area on resin-enamel tensile bond strength10.1016/S0109-5641(97)80098-X ↗
10. Adhesion to tooth structure: a critical review of “macro” test methods10.1016/j.dental.2009.11.150 ↗
11. Direct comparison of the bond strength results of the different test methods: a critical literature review10.1016/j.dental.2009.12.002 ↗
12. Relationship between surface area for adhesion and tensile bond strength – evaluation of a micro-tensile bond test10.1016/0109-5641(94)90067-1 ↗
13. The phenomena of rupture and flow in solids
14. The adhesion between fiver posts and root canal walls: comparison between microtensile and push-out bond strength measurements10.1111/j.1600-0722.2004.00146.x ↗
15. Analysis of interfacial behavior in MMCs and IMCs by the use of thin-slice push-out tests10.1016/0266-3538(95)00040-2 ↗
16. Effect of surface modification on the bond strength between zirconia and resin cement10.1111/jopr.12030 ↗
17. Influence of cavity dimensions and their derivatives (volume and ‘C’ factor) on shrinkage stress development and microleakage of composite restorations10.1016/j.dental.2005.11.010 ↗
18. A statistical distribution function of wide applicability10.1115/1.4010337 ↗
19. Physical properties of dentin10.1177/00220345520310031401 ↗
20. Do dental composites always shrink toward the light?10.1177/00220345980770060801 ↗
21. Finite element analysis of a glass fibre reinforced composite endodontic post10.1016/S0142-9612(01)00407-0 ↗
22. Effects of post materials and length on the stress distribution of endodonticaly treated maxillary central incisors: a 3D finite element analysis10.1111/j.1365-2842.2009.02000.x ↗
23. Influence of volume and activation mode on polymerization shrinkage forces of resin cements10.1590/0103-6440201302113 ↗
24. SEM evaluation of the cement layer thickness after luting two different posts
25. Setting stresses in composites for 2 different curing modes10.1016/0109-5641(93)90095-8 ↗
26. Influence of polymerization mode and C-factor on cohesive strength of dual-cured resin cements10.1016/j.dental.2012.03.002 ↗
27. Interfacial mechanics of push-out tests: theory and experiments10.1016/S1359-835X(00)00051-8 ↗
28. Adhesive post-endodontic restorations with fibre posts: push-out tests and SEM observations10.1016/S0109-5641(02)00003-9 ↗
29. Interfacial strength of Resilon and gutta-percha to intraradicular dentine10.1097/01.don.0000158230.15853.b7 ↗
30. Adhesion to Y-TZP ceramic: study of silica nanofilm coating on the surface of Y-TZP10.1002/jbm.b.33184 ↗