Effects of bonding area size, surface treatment and specimen configuration on the push out test for assessing bonding and stress distribution to Y-TZP
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Purpose To evaluate the influence of specimen configuration, bonding area and zirconia surface treatment on the push out bond strength to Y-TZP and on the stress distribution using finite element analysis (FEA). Materials and methods 240 Y-TZP blocks with a central perforation were assigned to 8 groups (n=30) according to the adhesive area (macro-test: 5 × 5.5 × 4 mm and micro-test: 5 × 5.5 × 1 mm), material inserted in the perforation (resin cement or composite resin) and surface treatment (silanization or tribochemical silica coating+silanization). Push-out bond strength test, failure modes evaluation and FEA were performed. Results Three-way ANOVA showed that bond strength was statistically higher for composite resin (p=0.00) and for macro specimens (p=0.00). Surface treatment significantly increased the adhesion, except for ‘resin cement macro-test’ (p=0.00). Finite element analysis showed that the stresses were more homogeneously distributed at the interface of micro-specimens. Conclusion Macro-push out with composite resin or cement does not appear to be promising when evaluating adhesion to zirconia ceramics; micro-push out with composite resin filler is an adequate method; the tribochemical silica coating surface treatment can be evaluated by all tested methods in the current study, except for the macro-test with resin cement condition.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Dental materials and restorations · Dental Implant Techniques and Outcomes · Dental Research and COVID-19
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (30)
Show source-provided references
1. Adhesion/cementation to zirconia and other non-silicate ceramics: where are we now?10.1016/j.dental.2010.10.022 ↗
2. Comparison of resin cement adhesion to Y TZP ceramic following manufacturers' instructions of the cements only10.1007/s00784-007-0151-y ↗
3. Effect of silica coating combined to a MDP-based primer on the resin bond to Y-TZP ceramic
4. A critical evaluation of bond strength tests for the assessment of bonding to Y-TZP10.1016/j.dental.2015.03.002 ↗
5. Do the microshear test variables affect the bond strength values?10.1155/2012/618960 ↗
6. Relationship between bond-strength tests and clinical outcomes10.1016/j.dental.2009.11.148 ↗
7. Do dentin bond strength tests serve a useful purpose?
8. Adhesion to tooth structure: a critical review of "micro" bond strength test methods10.1016/j.dental.2009.11.155 ↗
9. Effect of cross-sectional area on resin-enamel tensile bond strength10.1016/S0109-5641(97)80098-X ↗
10. Adhesion to tooth structure: a critical review of “macro” test methods10.1016/j.dental.2009.11.150 ↗
11. Direct comparison of the bond strength results of the different test methods: a critical literature review10.1016/j.dental.2009.12.002 ↗
12. Relationship between surface area for adhesion and tensile bond strength – evaluation of a micro-tensile bond test10.1016/0109-5641(94)90067-1 ↗
13. The phenomena of rupture and flow in solids
14. The adhesion between fiver posts and root canal walls: comparison between microtensile and push-out bond strength measurements10.1111/j.1600-0722.2004.00146.x ↗
15. Analysis of interfacial behavior in MMCs and IMCs by the use of thin-slice push-out tests10.1016/0266-3538(95)00040-2 ↗
16. Effect of surface modification on the bond strength between zirconia and resin cement10.1111/jopr.12030 ↗
17. Influence of cavity dimensions and their derivatives (volume and ‘C’ factor) on shrinkage stress development and microleakage of composite restorations10.1016/j.dental.2005.11.010 ↗
18. A statistical distribution function of wide applicability10.1115/1.4010337 ↗
19. Physical properties of dentin10.1177/00220345520310031401 ↗
20. Do dental composites always shrink toward the light?10.1177/00220345980770060801 ↗
21. Finite element analysis of a glass fibre reinforced composite endodontic post10.1016/S0142-9612(01)00407-0 ↗
22. Effects of post materials and length on the stress distribution of endodonticaly treated maxillary central incisors: a 3D finite element analysis10.1111/j.1365-2842.2009.02000.x ↗
23. Influence of volume and activation mode on polymerization shrinkage forces of resin cements10.1590/0103-6440201302113 ↗
24. SEM evaluation of the cement layer thickness after luting two different posts
25. Setting stresses in composites for 2 different curing modes10.1016/0109-5641(93)90095-8 ↗
26. Influence of polymerization mode and C-factor on cohesive strength of dual-cured resin cements10.1016/j.dental.2012.03.002 ↗
27. Interfacial mechanics of push-out tests: theory and experiments10.1016/S1359-835X(00)00051-8 ↗
28. Adhesive post-endodontic restorations with fibre posts: push-out tests and SEM observations10.1016/S0109-5641(02)00003-9 ↗
29. Interfacial strength of Resilon and gutta-percha to intraradicular dentine10.1097/01.don.0000158230.15853.b7 ↗
30. Adhesion to Y-TZP ceramic: study of silica nanofilm coating on the surface of Y-TZP10.1002/jbm.b.33184 ↗