Effect of adhesive material properties on phase-field analysis of T-peel adhesive joints using the Taguchi method
Bibliographic record
Abstract
No abstract is available for this record. The assistant can identify its topic from the title, but cannot infer the study’s results.
Source: Not provided · Quality: missing
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Numerical methods in engineering · Mechanical Behavior of Composites · Ultrasonics and Acoustic Wave Propagation
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (100+)
Show source-provided references
1. Adams · 2021
2. Adams · 1997
3. Apalak · 2015
4. da Silva
5. Da Silva · 2008
6. Analytical models of adhesively bonded joints—Part I: literature survey10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2008.06.005 ↗
7. 3-D FEM stress analysis and strength evaluation of single-lap adhesive joints subjected to impact tensile loads10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2011.06.008 ↗
8. Experimental and FEM studies on mechanical properties of single-lap adhesive joint with dissimilar adherends subjected to impact tensile loadings10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2013.02.007 ↗
9. Applicability of VCCT in mode I loading of yielding adhesively bonded joints—a case study10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2015.07.004 ↗
10. Ultimate tensile stress over a zone: a new failure criterion for adhesive joints10.1080/00218469308026578 ↗
11. Simulation of debonding in Al/epoxy T-peel joints using a potential-based cohesive zone model10.1016/j.proeng.2011.04.293 ↗
12. Modelling adhesive joints with cohesive zone models: effect of the cohesive law shape of the adhesive layer10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2013.02.006 ↗
13. Development of cohesive zone models for the prediction of damage and failure of glass/steel adhesive joints10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2019.102479 ↗
14. Numerical analysis of elasto-plastic adhesively single step lap joints with cohesive zone models and its experimental verification10.1007/s12206-021-0124-0 ↗
15. Modelling of single-lap joints using cohesive zone models: effect of the cohesive parameters on the output of the simulations10.1080/00218464.2012.660834 ↗
16. Application a direct/cohesive zone method for the evaluation of scarf adhesive joints10.1186/s40563-018-0115-2 ↗
17. Prediction of failure behavior of adhesively bonded CFRP scarf joints using a cohesive zone model10.1016/j.engfracmech.2020.106897 ↗
18. Static strength prediction of adhesive joints: a review10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2019.102451 ↗
19. Effects of joint geometry and material on stress distribution, strength and failure of bonded composite joints: an overview10.1080/00218464.2018.1554483 ↗
20. Strength prediction of single-and double-lap joints by standard and extended finite element modelling10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2010.09.008 ↗
21. An XFEM/CZM implementation for massively parallel simulations of composites fracture10.1016/j.compstruct.2015.01.053 ↗
22. Computational modeling of localized failure in solids: XFEM vs PF-CZM10.1016/j.cma.2018.10.044 ↗
23. The phenomena of rupture and flow in solids
24. Revisiting brittle fracture as an energy minimization problem10.1016/S0022-5096(98)00034-9 ↗
25. Wu · 2019
26. A phase field model for rate-independent crack propagation: robust algorithmic implementation based on operator splits10.1016/j.cma.2010.04.011 ↗
27. A phase-field model for ductile fracture at finite strains and its experimental verification10.1007/s00466-015-1225-3 ↗
28. Numerical experiments in revisited brittle fracture10.1016/S0022-5096(99)00028-9 ↗
29. Martınez-Paneda E. ABAQUS implementation of the phase field fracture method [n.d].
30. A unified abaqus implementation of the phase field fracture method using only a user material subroutine10.3390/ma14081913 ↗
31. Navidtehrani · 2021
32. An open-source Abaqus implementation of the phase-field method to study the effect of plasticity on the instantaneous fracture toughness in dynamic crack propagation10.1016/j.cma.2020.113004 ↗
33. 2D and 3D Abaqus implementation of a robust staggered phase-field solution for modeling brittle fracture10.1016/j.finel.2017.03.002 ↗
34. A unified phase-field approach for failure prediction in modulus graded adhesively bonded single-lap joints10.1016/j.tafmec.2023.104062 ↗
35. Considerations on a phase‐field model for adhesive fracture10.1002/nme.6341 ↗
36. A phase‐field model for cohesive fracture10.1002/nme.4553 ↗
37. Hansen-Dörr
38. A numerical analysis of the fracture toughness in phase-field modelling of adhesive fracture10.1002/pamm.201710094 ↗
39. Phase-field modelling of interface failure in brittle materials10.1016/j.cma.2018.11.020 ↗
40. Experimental and numerical analysis of adhesively-bonded T joints under peel loads10.1016/j.promfg.2017.09.008 ↗
41. Pre-notch and pre-crack size effects on T-peel fracture behaviors of SAC305 solder joints10.1016/j.tafmec.2024.104397 ↗
42. Experimental and numerical analysis of T-peel joints for the automotive industry10.1163/156856108X383529 ↗
43. A numerical analysis of the elastic-plastic peel test10.1016/j.engfracmech.2006.04.022 ↗
44. Adherend effect on the peel strength of a brittle adhesive10.1016/j.prostr.2022.02.002 ↗
45. Numerical analysis by XFEM of hybrid T-peel joints10.1016/j.prostr.2021.10.075 ↗
46. Strength prediction of T-peel joints by a hybrid spot-welding/adhesive bonding technique10.1080/00218464.2016.1244013 ↗
47. Evaluation of T-joints in aluminium structures under different geometries10.1016/j.promfg.2020.10.119 ↗
48. Locus of failure of T-peel joints formed between aluminium and various adhesives10.1016/S0143-7496(96)00025-5 ↗
49. Examining T-peel specimen bond length effects: experimental and numerical explorations of transitions to steady-state debonding10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2019.07.012 ↗
50. Standard test method for peel resistance of adhesives (T-peel test)
51. Advanced numerical methods for the strength prediction of hybrid adhesively bonded T-peel joints10.1080/00218464.2020.1823840 ↗
52. 2010 · vol. 4 · 1
53. Experimental and simulated comparison of finite element models of bimetallic sheets for deep drawing process10.1007/s00170-021-07944-0 ↗
54. Optimization of chaboche material parameters with a genetic algorithm10.3390/ma16051821 ↗
55. Abaqus2Matlab: a suitable tool for finite element post-processing10.1016/j.advengsoft.2017.01.006 ↗
56. 1998
57. Static assessment of the mixed-mode behaviour of three epoxy adhesives10.1016/j.engfracmech.2017.05.028 ↗
58. Mixed-mode fracture analysis of adhesively-bonded joints using the ATDCB test specimen10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2018.05.019 ↗
59. Mixed-mode fracture characterization of adhesive joints10.1016/0266-3538(94)90052-3 ↗
60. Mode II fatigue crack growth properties of adherends bonded with DP8005: end–notched flexible tests10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2018.02.026 ↗
61. Interface adhesion assessment of composite-to-metal bonded joints under salt spray conditions using peel tests10.1016/j.compstruct.2016.12.058 ↗
62. Analysis of the resistance of adhesively bonded joints with rigid-flexible substrates10.1088/1757-899X/1038/1/012017 ↗
63. A review on phase-field models of brittle fracture and a new fast hybrid formulation10.1007/s00466-014-1109-y ↗
64. A phase-field description of dynamic brittle fracture10.1016/j.cma.2012.01.008 ↗
65. A continuum phase field model for fracture10.1016/j.engfracmech.2010.08.009 ↗
66. Irwin · 1956
67. The variational approach to fracture10.1007/s10659-007-9107-3 ↗
68. A simple and robust Abaqus implementation of the phase field fracture method
69. Crack nucleation in variational phase-field models of brittle fracture10.1016/j.jmps.2017.09.006 ↗
70. Regularized formulation of the variational brittle fracture with unilateral contact: numerical experiments10.1016/j.jmps.2009.04.011 ↗
71. A unified phase-field theory for the mechanics of damage and quasi-brittle failure10.1016/j.jmps.2017.03.015 ↗
72. Gradient damage models and their use to approximate brittle fracture10.1177/1056789510386852 ↗
73. A length scale insensitive phase-field damage model for brittle fracture10.1016/j.jmps.2018.06.006 ↗
74. A phase field formulation for hydrogen assisted cracking10.1016/j.cma.2018.07.021 ↗
75. A higher-order phase-field model for brittle fracture: formulation and analysis within the isogeometric analysis framework10.1016/j.cma.2014.01.016 ↗
76. Evaluation of different modelling conditions in the cohesive zone analysis of single-lap bonded joints10.1080/00218464.2017.1307107 ↗
77. Phase field modeling and computer implementation: a review10.1016/j.engfracmech.2022.108234 ↗
78. Employing phase‐field descriptions of cohesive zone placements in cohesive fracture simulations10.1002/nme.6864 ↗
79. Cohesive zone interpretations of phase-field fracture models10.1115/1.4055660 ↗
80. The phase-field model with an auto-calibrated degradation function based on general softening laws for cohesive fracture10.1016/j.apm.2020.05.005 ↗
81. Investigation of surface morphology of drilled cfrp plates and optimization of cutting parameters10.1142/S0218625X19502093 ↗
82. Kriyojenik İşlem Görmüş Nikel Esaslı Süperalaşımın Elektro-Erozyon İşleme Performansı Optimizasyonu
83. Investigation of the machinability of SiC reinforced MMC materials produced by molten metal stirring and conventional casting technique in die-sinking electrical discharge machine10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2020.105875 ↗
84. 2024
85. Length scale and mesh bias sensitivity of phase-field models for brittle and cohesive fracture10.1016/j.engfracmech.2019.106532 ↗
86. Phase field fracture modelling using quasi-Newton methods and a new adaptive step scheme10.1016/j.tafmec.2019.102446 ↗
87. A length scale insensitive phase field model for brittle fracture of hyperelastic solids10.1016/j.engfracmech.2020.107196 ↗
88. The fracture behaviour of structural adhesives under high rates of testing10.1016/j.engfracmech.2009.07.013 ↗
89. A parametric study of the peel test10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2007.06.006 ↗
90. Effect of adhesive free-end geometry on the initiation and propagation of damaged zones in adhesively bonded lap joints10.1163/156856104839293 ↗
91. A stress singularity approach for the prediction of fatigue crack initiation in adhesive bonds. Part 1: theory10.1080/00218469908010490 ↗
92. Cohesive behaviors of hydrogel under large-scale bridging10.1115/1.4051907 ↗
93. On the mode I toughness of adhesive bonds exhibiting strain-softening and re-hardening10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2018.11.026 ↗
94. Stress and energy analysis of toughness measurement for adhesive bonds10.1016/0013-7944(88)90015-X ↗
95. On the toughness of ductile adhesive joints10.1016/0022-5096(96)00011-7 ↗
96. Numerical evaluation of the adhesive effect on the peel strength of aluminum T-joints10.1016/j.prostr.2023.06.040 ↗
97. Numerical evaluation of the phase-field model for brittle fracture with emphasis on the length scale10.1007/s00466-017-1373-8 ↗
98. Phase field fracture in elasto-plastic solids: a length-scale insensitive model for quasi-brittle materials10.1007/s00466-020-01887-1 ↗
99. On degradation functions in phase field fracture models10.1016/j.commatsci.2015.05.034 ↗
100. On the choice of parameters in the phase field method for simulating crack initiation with experimental validation10.1007/s10704-016-0082-1 ↗