journal article·2015-10

Influence of different adhesive protocols on ceramic bond strength and degree of conversion of resin cements

Mayra de Mello Fabião, Thiago Henrique Scarabello Stape, Cristiane Rumi Fujiwara Yanikian, Adriano Fonseca de Lima, Eliane Cristina Gava Pizi, Giselle Maria Marchi Baron, Luís Roberto Marcondes Martins

Publisher page

Abstract

Since light-curing through ceramic dental restorations can be attenuated by the material crystalline structure, the use of specific adhesive protocols might enhance bonding effectiveness of dual-cure resin cements. This study evaluated the micro-shear bond strength (µSBS) of different adhesive protocols containing dual-cured resin cements bonded to two glass ceramics: fluorapatite leucite (FLC) and lithium dissilicate reinforced ceramic (LDC), and their effect on the degree of conversion (DC) of resin cements. For each ceramic, eight adhesive protocols were tested using combinations of three different resin cements and four adhesive resins. Following the adhesive resin application on ceramic disk surface, resin cement cylinders were produced. After 24 h, the µSBS test was performed ( n =8), a shear load was applied at a crosshead speed of 0.5 mm/min until failure and fracture patterns were determined. Resin cement DC analysis was performed by Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy ( n=5). Data were statistically analyzed using two-way ANOVA, followed by Tukey test ( α=0.05). The interaction of adhesive protocol and ceramic type significantly affected the micro-shear bond strength and resin cement DC ( p<0.0001). For the FLC, adhesive protocols containing the conventional resin cement produced higher µSBS values compared to the remaining protocols. For the LDC, the combination of the conventional resin cement and an adhesive resin containing photoactivators produced higher µSBS compared to the other tested adhesive protocols. The conventional resin cement and the self-etch cement produced higher conversion values when luted to the LDC. Selection of specific adhesive protocols should be carefully considered to improve bonding to glass ceramics.
Source: expertdata · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Dental materials and restorations · Dental Research and COVID-19 · Dental Implant Techniques and Outcomes

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (44)

Show source-provided references
1. Clinical long-term evaluation and failure characteristics of 1335 all-ceramic restorations
2. Clinical performance of porcelain laminate veneers for up to 20 years
3. Ceramic inlays: clinical assessment and survival rate
4. A prospective 15-year evaluation of extensive dentin–enamel-bonded pressed ceramic coverages10.1016/j.dental.2010.05.008 ↗
5. Porcelain veneers: a review of the literature10.1016/S0300-5712(99)00066-4 ↗
6. Aspects of bonding between resin luting cements and glass ceramic materials10.1016/j.dental.2014.01.017 ↗
7. Clinical evaluation of ceramic inlays and onlays fabricated with two systems: five-year follow-up10.2341/12-039-C ↗
8. Resin–ceramic bonding: a review of the literature10.1067/mpr.2003.50 ↗
9. Fatigue of dental ceramics10.1016/j.jdent.2013.10.007 ↗
10. Does adhesive resin application contribute to resin bond durability on etched and silanized feldspathic ceramic?
11. Aspects of silane coupling agents and surface conditioning in dentistry: an overview10.1016/j.dental.2012.02.009 ↗
12. Bonding of resin composites to etchable ceramic surfaces – an insight review of the chemical aspects on surface conditioning10.1111/j.1365-2842.2005.01569.x ↗
13. Bonding to glass infiltrated alumina ceramic: adhesive methods and their durability10.1016/S0022-3913(05)80200-8 ↗
14. Long-term bond between dual-polymerizing cementing agents and human hard dental tissue10.1016/j.dental.2006.01.012 ↗
15. In vitro shear bond strength of cementing agents to fixed prosthodontic restorative materials10.1016/j.prosdent.2004.06.027 ↗
16. Influence of interface surface conditions on indentation failure of simulated bonded ceramic onlays10.1016/j.dental.2005.04.005 ↗
17. Characterization of treated porcelain surfaces via dynamic contact angle analysis
18. Effect of water aging on microtensile bond strength of dual-cured resin cements to pre-treated sintered zirconium-oxide ceramics10.1016/j.dental.2008.09.002 ↗
19. Quantification of the amount of light passing through zirconia: the effect of material shade, thickness, and curing conditions10.1016/j.jdent.2014.03.007 ↗
20. The effect of resin formulation on the degree of conversion and mechanical properties of dental restorative resins10.1002/jbm.820200111 ↗
21. Effect of energy density on properties and marginal integrity of posterior resin composite restorations10.1016/S0109-5641(03)00124-6 ↗
22. Influence of the feldspathic ceramic thickness and shade on the microhardness of dual resin cement10.2341/05-51 ↗
23. Influence of different ceramics on resin cement Knoop hardness number10.2341/07-155 ↗
24. Effect of light source and time on the polymerization of resin cement through ceramic veneers10.1111/j.1532-849X.2001.00133.x ↗
25. Effect of sodium sulfinate salts on the polymerization characteristics of dual-cured resin cement systems exposed to attenuated light-activation10.1016/j.jdent.2008.11.016 ↗
26. Porcelain laminate veneers. A retrospective evaluation after 1 to 10 years of service: Part II – clinical results
27. Fired ceramic inlays: a 6-year follow up10.1016/S0300-5712(97)00005-5 ↗
28. An 18-year retrospective evaluation of glass-infiltrated alumina crowns
29. Survival of Dicor glass-ceramic dental restorations over 14 years: Part I. Survival of Dicor complete coverage restorations and effect of internal surface acid etching, tooth position, gender, and age10.1016/S0022-3913(99)70231-3 ↗
30. Analysis of interfacial fracture in dental restorations10.1016/j.dental.2011.06.009 ↗
31. Pressable feldspathic inlays in premolars: effect of cementation strategy and mechanical cycling on the adhesive bond between dentin and restoration
32. Comparison of the flexural strength of five adhesive resin cements10.1111/j.1532-849X.2006.00151.x ↗
33. Influence of polymerization mode and C-factor on cohesive strength of dual-cured resin cements10.1016/j.dental.2012.03.002 ↗
34. The impact of hydrofluoric acid etching followed by unfilled resin on the biaxial strength of a glass-ceramic10.1016/j.dental.2013.08.210 ↗
35. The effect of adhesives with various degrees of hydrophilicity on resin ceramic bond durability10.1016/j.dental.2003.05.010 ↗
36. Influence of curing light attenuation caused by aesthetic indirect restorative materials on resin cement polymerization10.1055/s-0039-1697845 ↗
37. Effect of polymerization mode of a dual-cured resin cement on time-dependent shear bond strength to porcelain
38. The influence of light exposure on polymerization of dual-cure resin cements
39. Influence of curing method and storage condition on microhardness of dual-cure resin cements10.4012/dmj.24.70 ↗
40. The effect of a “resin coating” on the interfacial adaptation of composite inlays
41. Factors contributing to the incompatibility between simplified-step adhesives and chemically-cured or dual-cured composites. Part III. Effect of acidic resin monomers
42. Microtensile bond strength of new self-adhesive luting agents and conventional multistep systems10.1016/S0022-3913(09)60180-3 ↗
43. Comparison of four silane primers and an isocyanate primer for bonding of tri-n-butylborane resin to a leucite-reinforced glass ceramic10.1016/j.jpor.2012.09.002 ↗
44. An investigation of the composite resin/porcelain interface10.1111/j.1834-7819.1992.tb00827.x ↗