Topology optimization of adhesively bonded double lap joints
Source abstract
Abstract
Current studies show great, but unutilized potential for mechanical optimization of adhesively bonded joints. There are different approaches, e. g. mixed adhesive joints ; tapered adherends or joints with spew fillets, all of which try to redistribute the stress peaks, occurring at the ends of adhesive layer overlap, in favor to the load capacity. However, these investigations fail to take a general approach to find optimal geometric solutions to the problem of joining two materials by means of adhesive bonding. Instead the geometry is changed by predefined parameters such as tapering angles, spew fillet radii or the number of adhesives in mixed adhesive joints. To allow a non-parametric optimization, this paper proposes and investigates an extended bi-directional evolutionary structural optimization methodology based on a failure criterion to account for othotropic materials, which are often used in the context of bonding. The optimized joint geometry, generated by the proposed algorithm, resulted in a fairly constant distribution of elemental failure probability compared to the non-optimized state, thus eliminating underutilized spots of material and increasing the efficiency of the connection. Furthermore the influence of different parameters such as the overlap-length to adherend thickness ratio; the stiffness between adherend and adhesive as well as the adherend degree of orthotropy were investigated for optimal joint geometry.
Source: expertdata · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Topology Optimization in Engineering · Composite Structure Analysis and Optimization · Advanced Multi-Objective Optimization Algorithms
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (32)
Show source-provided references
1. A simple evolutionary procedure for structural optimization10.1016/0045-7949(93)90035-C ↗
2. Lviii. the limits of economy of material in frame-structures, the London, Edinburgh, and Dublin10.1080/14786440409463229 ↗
3. Evolutionary structural optimisation using an additive algorithm10.1016/S0168-874X(99)00044-X ↗
4. Bi-directional evolutionary structural optimization on advanced structures and materials: a comprehensive review10.1007/s11831-016-9203-2 ↗
5. Evolutionary structural optimisation (eso) using a bidirectional algorithm10.1108/02644409810244129 ↗
6. 3d and multiple load case bi-directional evolutionary structural optimization (beso)10.1007/BF01195993 ↗
7. A performance index for topology and shape optimization of plate bending problems with displacement constraints10.1007/PL00013281 ↗
8. Computational efficiency and validation of bi-directional evolutionary structural optimisation10.1016/S0045-7825(99)00309-6 ↗
9. Evolutionary structural optimization for problems with stiffness constraints10.1016/0168-874X(95)00043-S ↗
10. On various aspects of evolutionary structural optimization for problems with stiffness constraints10.1016/S0168-874X(96)00049-2 ↗
11. Convergent and mesh-independent solutions for the bi-directional evolutionary structural optimization method10.1016/j.finel.2007.06.006 ↗
12. A simple checkerboard suppression algorithm for evolutionary structural optimization10.1007/s001580100140 ↗
13. A new algorithm for bi-directional evolutionary structural optimization10.1299/jsmec.49.1091 ↗
14. Topology optimization of nonlinear structures under displacement loading10.1016/j.engstruct.2008.01.009 ↗
15. Evolutionary topology optimization of elastoplastic structures10.1007/s00158-016-1523-1 ↗
16. Fatigue and static failure considerations using a topology optimization method10.1016/j.apm.2014.07.020 ↗
17. Bi-directional evolutionary topology optimization of continuum structures with one or multiple materials10.1007/s00466-008-0312-0 ↗
18. 3d multi-material and multi-joint topology optimization with tooling accessibility constraints10.1007/s00158-019-02344-1 ↗
19. Topology optimization for periodic multi-component structures with stiffness and frequency criteria10.1007/s00158-019-02481-7 ↗
20. A simple approach to structural frequency optimization10.1016/0045-7949(94)90414-6 ↗
21. Evolutionary structural optimization for dynamic problems10.1016/0045-7949(95)00235-9 ↗
22. A review of topology optimization for additive manufacturing: status and challenges10.1016/j.cja.2020.09.020 ↗
23. A further review of eso type methods for topology optimization10.1007/s00158-010-0487-9 ↗
24. Influence of stress-reduction methods on the strength of adhesively bonded joints composed of orthotropic brittle adherends10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2010.05.007 ↗
25. Chiminelli · 2017 · vol. 76
26. Joint strength optimization by the mixed-adhesive technique10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2008.09.009 ↗
27. Topology optimisation of adhesive joints using non-parametric methods10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2017.11.003 ↗
28. Charles · 1962 · vol. 1962 · 40
29. A new look at eso and beso optimization methods10.1007/s00158-007-0140-4 ↗
30. Wang · 2010 · 25.09
31. Adaptive mesh refinement in stress-constrained topology optimization10.1007/s00158-018-2084-2 ↗
32. Developing topology optimization with additive manufacturing constraints in ansys10.1016/j.ifacol.2018.08.340 ↗