Adhesion of surgical sealants used in cardiothoracic and vascular surgery
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Surgical sealants are widely used in cardiothoracic and vascular surgery essentially for hemostasis and sealing. Their adhesive properties have mainly been studied by clinical experiments. The objective of this study is to measure adhesion of the three main types of surgical sealant used in cardiothoracic and vascular surgery under normalized realistic conditions. The bulge-and-blister test was used to quantify adhesive performances of three types of surgical adhesives: cyanoacrylates, polyethylene glycol (PEG), and aldehydes. Samples were composed of two circular layers of equine pericardium glued by the surgical sealant studied. Comparative adhesion testing was carried out in eight samples bonded with a Dermabond® (cyanoacrylate), five samples with Bioglue® (aldehyde), four samples with Coseal® (PEG), and thirteen samples bonded with an industrial cyanoacrylate. Scanning electron microscope (SEM) observations of cross-sections of samples glued by Dermabond® and environmental scanning electron microscopy (ESEM) images of samples composed of equine pericardium glued by Bioglue® were also performed. The average value of the adhesion energy is 2.3+/−1.5 J.m−2 for samples glued with Dermabond®, 6.04+/−1.61 J.m−2 with Bioglue®, 2.37+/−1.25 J m−2 with Coseal®, 3.74+/−1.33 J m−2 with the industrial cyanoacrylate glue in surgical conditions. SEM observations of cross-sections of samples glued by Dermabond® showed a failure at the interface between the glue and the pericardial layer. ESEM observations have revealed a majority of regions where the glue is not linked to the pericardium. Adhesive performance measurements and microscopy observations in surgical conditions show that surgical sealants adhesion is weak and explain their poor efficacy in clinical practice. To improve adhesion in the surgical field, we need to focus on achieving a better cohesion between the adhesive and the substrate by modifying conditions adhesive bonding and consequently tend toward cohesive failure.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Surgical Sutures and Adhesives · Hemostasis and retained surgical items
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (28)
Show source-provided references
1. Une revue des colles utilisées en chirurgies cardiaque, thoracique et vasculaire
2. Hemostats, sealants, and adhesives III: a new update as well as cost and regulatory considerations for components of the surgical toolbox10.1111/j.1537-2995.2012.03707.x ↗
3. Prospective randomized study evaluating an absorbable cyanoacrylate for use in vascular reconstructions10.1016/j.jvs.2006.06.039 ↗
4. Surgical glues: are they really adhesive?10.1016/j.ejcts.2009.06.026 ↗
5. Glickman M, Gheissari A, Money S, Martin J, Ballard JL. A polymeric sealant inhibits anastomotic suture hole bleeding more rapidly than gelfoam/thrombin: results of a randomized controlled trial. Arch Surg (Chicago, Ill 1960) Glickman M, Gheissari A, Money S, Martin J, Ballard JL (2002). A polym sealant inhib anastomotic suture hole bleeding more rapidly than gelfoam/thrombin results a randomized control Tri, 137; 2002. p. 326–3. discussion 332.
6. Improved intraoperative management of anastomotic bleeding during aortic reconstruction: results of a randomized controlled trial10.1177/000313480407000408 ↗
7. A prospective randomized study to assess the efficacy of a surgical sealant to treat air leaks in lung surgery10.1016/j.ejcts.2009.01.027 ↗
8. A prospective randomized controlled study to assess the effectiveness of CoSeal® to seal air leaks in lung surgery
9. The use of gelatin-resorcin-formalin glue in acute aortic dissection type A10.1016/S1010-7940(99)00084-6 ↗
10. Devastating late complication for repair of type A acute aortic dissection with usage of gelatin-resorcinol-formalin glue
11. BioGlue surgical adhesive impairs aortic growth and causes anastomotic strictures10.1016/S0003-4975(02)03512-9 ↗
12. Release of glutaraldehyde from an albumin-glutaraldehyde tissue adhesive causes significant in vitro and in vivo toxicity10.1016/j.athoracsur.2004.11.054 ↗
13. Easy removal of pressure sensitive adhesives for skin applications10.1016/S0143-7496(01)00015-X ↗
14. Adherence performances of pressure sensitive adhesives on a model viscoelastic synthetic film: a tool for the understanding of adhesion on the human skin
15. The chemistry of tissue adhesive materials10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2014.02.001 ↗
16. Reply to Dragu et al10.1016/j.ejcts.2009.10.021 ↗
17. Adhesive strength and curing rate of marine mussel protein extracts on porcine small intestinal submucosa10.1016/j.actbio.2007.02.004 ↗
18. Use of a skin adhesive (octyl-2-cyanoacrylate) and the optimum reinforcing combination for suturing wounds10.1080/02844310500340004 ↗
19. Materials science of adhesives: how to bond things together10.1557/mrs2003.121 ↗
20. Designing model systems for enhanced adhesion10.1557/mrs2007.84 ↗
21. Relationship between viscoelastic and peeling properties of model adhesives. Part 1: cohesive fracture10.1080/00218469708010519 ↗
22. Aldehyde-amine chemistry enables modulated biosealants with tissue-specific adhesion10.1002/adma.200900340 ↗
23. A blood-resistant surgical glue for minimally invasive repair of vessels and heart defects10.1126/scitranslmed.3006557 ↗
24. Mechanically robust, negative-swelling, mussel-inspired tissue adhesives10.1002/adhm.201200316 ↗
25. Biodegradable non-aromatic adhesive polyurethanes based on disaccharides for medical applications10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2013.12.012 ↗
26. Sticking with synthetic tissue sealants10.1056/NEJMcibr1400477 ↗
27. Gluing – a challenge in surgery10.1016/0143-7496(96)88480-6 ↗
28. Peeling of PSAs on viscoelastic substrates: a failure criterion10.1080/00218460701282554 ↗