journal article·2007-04

Evaluation of the bond strength of different composite resins to porcelain and metal alloy

Zeynep Duymus Yesil, Serpil Karaoglanoglu, M. Samil Akyil, Nilgun Seven

Publisher page

Abstract

This study was carried out with the purpose of testing the bond strength of three different composite resins bonding to different base substrates. Substrates to which composite resins would be applied were prepared in three different ways: porcelain, metal and porcelain–metal in a 10-mm diameter and 4 mm thickness. Operating surfaces were air-abraded with Al 2O 3 and they were cleaned in distilled water in ultrasonic cleaning equipment for 10 min. After completing the preparation of the surface, three different composite resins with single bond agent in a 3.5-mm diameter and 2 mm thickness were applied to the central region of the specimens. All specimens were thermocycled between 5 and 55 °C for 200 cycles with a 30-s dwell time. After thermocycling, specimens were stored in 37 °C distilled water for an additional 7 days before being subjected to a shear load. Shear test was applied in using a Hounsfield test machine. The univariate analysis of variance and the Duncan multiple comparison test were used for statistical assessment. It was found that both type of composite material and of substrate led to statistically significant differences in bond strength ( p<0.01). It was found that there was higher bond strength in Filtek Z 250 and metal substrate (16.19 MPa) and there was lower bond strength in Surefil and porcelain base substrate (1.09 MPa).
Source: expertdata · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Dental materials and restorations · Building materials and conservation · Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (41)

Show source-provided references
1. Longevity of fixed partial dentures10.1016/S0022-3913(97)70115-X ↗
2. Causes of failure following oral rehabilitation: biological versus technical factors
3. Long-term clinical study of porcelain-fused-to-gold restorations10.1016/0022-3913(84)90217-8 ↗
4. Bond strength and microleakage of porcelain repair materials10.1016/0022-3913(85)90471-8 ↗
5. Chung · 1993
6. Shear bond strengths of 2 intraoral porcelain repair systems to porcelain or metal substrates10.1067/mpr.2001.119843 ↗
7. Adhesive monomers for porcelain repair
8. Shear bond strength of composite resin porselain repair materials bonded to metal and porcelain10.1016/0022-3913(90)90122-S ↗
9. Porcelain-to-composite bond strengths using four organosilane materials10.1016/0022-3913(89)90368-5 ↗
10. Tensile bond strengths of five porcelain repair systems
11. Bond strength of intraoral porcelain repair materials10.1016/0022-3913(89)90133-9 ↗
12. Composite resin repair of porcelain using different bonding materials
13. A new porcelain repair system with a silane coupler, ferric chloride, and adhesive opaque resin10.1177/00220345890680051201 ↗
14. Evaluation of bond strength of six porcelain repair systems10.1016/0022-3913(89)90037-1 ↗
15. Fatigue life of porcelain repair systems
16. Tensile bond strength of etched porcelain [Abstract]
17. Shear strength of the composite bond to etched porcelain10.1177/00220345870660091001 ↗
18. Effect of APF etching time on resin bonded porcelain [Abstract]
19. Effect of porcelain surface treatment on the bond to composite10.1016/0022-3913(88)90270-3 ↗
20. Comparison of acidulated phosphate fluoride gel and hydrofluoric acid etchants for porcelain–composite repair10.1016/0022-3913(94)90067-1 ↗
21. Esthetic repair of porcelain in a complete-mouth reconstruction: a case report
22. Bonding strengths of porcelain repair systems with various surface treatments10.1016/S0022-3913(97)70025-8 ↗
23. Composite resin repair of porcelain denture teeth10.1016/0022-3913(77)90013-0 ↗
24. Tensile fatique limits of prosthodontics adhesives10.1177/00220345910700031001 ↗
25. Bond strength of composite to alloy treated with bonding systems10.1111/j.1532-849X.1993.tb00391.x ↗
26. A comparison of bond strengths of adhesive cast restorations using different designs, bonding agents, and luting resins10.1016/0022-3913(87)90134-X ↗
27. Shear bond strength of composite resin to microetched metal with five newer-generation bonding agents
28. Sandblasting and silica coating of a glass-infiltrated alumina ceramic: volume loss, morphology, and changes in the surface composition10.1016/0022-3913(94)90182-1 ↗
29. Effects of surface treatment and bonding agents on bond strength of composite resin to porcelain10.1016/0022-3913(93)90004-8 ↗
30. Bond strength of composite to metal mediated by metal adhesive promoters10.1016/0022-3913(87)90334-9 ↗
31. Adhesive bonding of composites to a casting alloy10.1016/0022-3913(88)90268-5 ↗
32. Anusavice · 1996
33. Bond strength of composite resin to porcelain with newer generation of porcelain repair systems10.1016/0022-3913(93)90029-N ↗
34. Bond strengths of porcelain repair adhesive systems
35. Evaluation of a 4-META porcelain repair systems10.1111/j.1708-8240.1991.tb00798.x ↗
36. Bond strength of composite to porcelain treated with new porcelain repair agents10.1016/0109-5641(92)90074-M ↗
37. Phillips · 1982
38. Effects of bonding material and surface treatments on bonding of composite resin materials to porcelain surface
39. Shear strength of composite bonded porcelain-to-porcelain in a new repair system10.1016/0022-3913(94)90109-0 ↗
40. In vitro study of the effect of thermo-and load-cycling on the bond strength of porcelain repair systems10.1046/j.1365-2842.1999.00346.x ↗
41. Composite resins bonded to porcelain with silane solution10.14219/jada.archive.1978.0071 ↗