journal article·2021-03

Influence of hydrophobic layer of Bis-EMA with different ethoxilations on adhesive's bonding efficacy and mechanical properties

Julianne Coelho Silva, Madiana Magalhães Moreira, Caio Felipe de Almeida Nobre, Vitaliano Gomes Araújo Neto, Diego Lomonaco, Victor Pinheiro Feitosa

Publisher page

Abstract

Objectives The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of a hydrophobic layer of Bis-EMA 4 (B4, 4 ethoxilations), Bis-EMA 10 (B10, 10 ethoxilations) or Bis-EMA 30 (B30, 30 ethoxilations) on dentin adhesion and mechanical properties of a universal adhesive. Materials and methods Extracted human molars were cut and restored using self-etching mode of Ambar Universal (AU, FGM) adhesive and divided according to the hydrophobic layer employed (n = 8): only AU (Control), SBMP (Scotchbond Multi-Purpose adhesive, 3 M, Commercial Control), B4, B10 and B30. Microtensile bond strength (μTBS) and nanoleakage tests were performed after 24h and 6 months water storage. Interface micro-permeability was surveyed by confocal microscopy. Dynamic-mechanical analysis (DMA) of each adhesive combination (50 wt% Ambar + 50 wt% BisEMA or 100% Ambar) were assessed. The data were statistically analyzed using two-way ANOVA and Tukey`s test (p < 0.05). Results SBMP achieved the highest μTBS, followed by B4, B10 and Control, whilst B30 presented significantly lowest μTBS when compared with further groups (p < 0.001). After ageing, the only group depicting significant μTBS reduction was Control (p = 0,009). B4 and SBMP were almost devoid of silver deposits and did not show any signs of gaps, even after ageing. B4 presented the lowest micropermeability and the best mechanical behavior on DMA, showing the highest rubbery zone and increased glass transition temperature. Conclusions Bis-EMA-4 might be a suitable monomer for a hydrophobic layer in adhesive strategy, reducing hydrolytic degradation and increasing the durability and mechanical properties of adhesive interfaces.
Source: expertdata · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Dental materials and restorations · Dental Erosion and Treatment · Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (28)

Show source-provided references
1. Hydrolytic degradation of the resin-dentine interface induced by the simulated pulpal pressure, direct and indirect water ageing10.1016/j.jdent.2012.09.011 ↗
2. Use of (meth)acrylamides as alternative monomers in dental adhesive systems10.1016/j.dental.2019.02.012 ↗
3. Impact of hydrophilicity and length of spacer chains on the bonding of functional monomers10.1016/j.dental.2014.06.006 ↗
4. Degradation of adhesive-dentin interfaces created using different bonding strategies after five-year simulated pulpal pressure
5. In vitro performance of 2-step, total etch adhesives modified by thiourethane additives10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2020.102688 ↗
6. Resin-dentin bonding interface: mechanisms of degradation and strategies for stabilization of the hybrid layer10.1155/2019/5268342 ↗
7. Effect of coinitiator and water on the photoreactivity and photopolymerization of HEMA/camphorquinone-based reactant mixtures10.1002/jbm.a.30733 ↗
8. Combination of baicalein and ethanol-wet-bonding improves dentin bonding durability10.1016/j.jdent.2019.103207 ↗
9. Application of hydrophobic resin adhesives to acid-etched dentin with an alternative wet bonding technique10.1002/jbm.a.31290 ↗
10. Effects of long-term water storage on the microtensile bond strength of five experimental self-etching adhesives based on surfactants rather than HEMA10.1007/s00784-012-0791-4 ↗
11. Technique-sensitivity of contemporary adhesives10.4012/dmj.24.1 ↗
12. Adhesion evaluation of dentin sealing, micropermeability, and bond strength of current HEMA-free adhesives to dentin
13. Resin based restorative dental materials: characteristics and future perspectives10.1016/j.jdsr.2019.09.004 ↗
14. Effect of a new method to simulate pulpal pressure on bond strength and nanoleakage of dental adhesives to dentin
15. Bond strength of methacrylate-based blends containing elastomeric monomers and alternative initiators after thermomechanical cycling
16. Determination of homologous distributions of bisEMA dimethacrylates in bulk-fill resin-composites by GC-MS10.1016/j.dental.2015.02.006 ↗
17. Dimethacrylate network formation and polymer property evolution as determined by the selection of monomers and curing conditions10.1016/j.dental.2011.09.005 ↗
18. High-Performance dental adhesives containing an ether-based monomer10.1177/0022034519895269 ↗
19. Long-term elution of monomers from resin-based dental composites10.1016/j.dental.2019.01.005 ↗
20. Water sorption of several bonding resins
21. The role of polymerization in adhesive dentistry10.1016/j.dental.2018.11.012 ↗
22. Two methods to simulate intrapulpal pressure: effects upon bonding performance of self-etch adhesives10.1111/iej.12222 ↗
23. Dentin bonding systems: from dentin collagen structure to bond preservation and clinical applications10.1016/j.dental.2017.11.005 ↗
24. Effect of composite polymerization stress and placement technique on dentin micropermeability of class I restorations
25. Glycerol-dimethacrylate as alternative hydrophilic monomer for HEMA replacement in simplified adhesives10.1016/j.jmbbm.2018.03.022 ↗
26. Do universal adhesives benefit from an extra bonding layer?
27. Influence of a hydrophobic resin coating on the immediate and 6-month dentin bonding of three universal adhesive10.1016/j.dental.2015.07.002 ↗
28. Effect of an extra layer of hydrophobic resin on the microleakage of Cl V composite resin restorations with a universal adhesive system10.1111/jicd.12234 ↗