Stress singularity in a rectangular bond specimen of a solid rocket motor: Effects and elimination
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract The propellant/liner interface is the weakest and most concerning part of the grain structure in a solid rocket motor. Rectangular bond specimen tests have gradually become one of the standard methods to measure the bonding abilities of propellant/liner/insulation joints. We performed a three-dimensional numerical study to give full knowledge of this new test, paying close attention to the stress singularity at the crack tip. The asymptotic stress field was presented to show the singularity at the crack tip on the steel/insulation interface. Subsequently the stress singularity was investigated numerically. Numerical results show that the stress singularity has a considerable effect on the stress distribution of the nearby propellant. Also we proposed some methods to eliminate these effects, such as inserting a cohesive zone model into the steel/insulation interface or increasing the thickness of insulation layer. Moreover, Mises stress and maximum principle stress have completely opposite distributions on the propellant/liner interface; thus the accurate failure criterion can be confirmed by the damage initialization observed in experiments.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Energetic Materials and Combustion · High-Velocity Impact and Material Behavior · Electromagnetic Launch and Propulsion Technology
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (25)
Show source-provided references
1. Cohesive zone modeling of propellant and insulation interface debonding10.1080/00218464.2013.790773 ↗
2. Investigation of the fracture mechanism and fracture energy of HTPB propellant/liner interface debonding
3. Bonding of composite propellant in cast-in-case rocket motors10.2514/3.28461 ↗
4. Christiansen AG, Laheru KP, Anderson GP. Cohesive and adhesive analog test specimens for solid propellant grain simulation. In: Proceedings of the AIAA, SAE, and ASME, joint propulsion conference, 19th, Seattle, WA; 1983:27(29).10.2514/6.1983-1118 ↗
5. Kuhlmann T, Peeters R, Bills K. Modified maximum principal stress failure criterion applied to propellant-liner bond failures. In: Proceedings of the AIAA, SAE, ASME, and ASEE, joint propulsion conference, 21st, Monterey, CA; 1985:8(10).10.2514/6.1985-1439 ↗
6. QJ2038-1A, Test method for interface bonding strenght of solid rockect motor chamber: part 1, unstick test for rectangular bond specimen; 2004.
7. The stresses around a fault or crack in dissimilar media10.1785/BSSA0490020199 ↗
8. Large deformations near a tip of an interface-crack between two Neo-Hookean sheets10.1007/BF00042997 ↗
9. A finite elastostatic analysis of bimaterial interface cracks10.1007/BF00047452 ↗
10. Edge-bonded dissimilar orthogonal elastic wedges under normal and shear loading10.1115/1.3601236 ↗
11. Yielding of steel sheets containing slits10.1016/0022-5096(60)90013-2 ↗
12. The mathematical theory of equilibrium cracks in brittle fracture
13. Mode I fracture toughness of adhesively bonded joints as a function of temperature: experimental and numerical study10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2010.09.005 ↗
14. Mode II fracture toughness of adhesively bonded joints as a function of temperature: experimental and numerical study10.1080/00218464.2012.660835 ↗
15. Strength prediction of adhesively bonded joints under cyclic thermal loading using a cohesive zone model10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2012.10.009 ↗
16. The strength prediction of adhesive single lap joints exposed to long term loading in a hostile environment10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2014.06.013 ↗
17. The cohesive zone model: advantages, limitations and challenges10.1016/S0013-7944(01)00083-2 ↗
18. Xu · 2006
19. Simulation of crack propagation in HTPB propellant using cohesive zone model10.1016/j.engfailanal.2012.05.025 ↗
20. Direct extraction of rate-dependent traction–separation laws for polyurea/steel interfaces10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2008.08.019 ↗
21. Mixed-mode, time-dependent rubber/metal debonding10.1016/S0022-5096(00)00065-X ↗
22. The influence of bond line thickness and peel arm thickness on adhesive fracture toughness of rubber toughened epoxy–aluminium alloy laminates10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2007.05.005 ↗
23. Effects of adhesive thickness on global and local Mode-I interfacial fracture of bonded joints10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2010.05.006 ↗
24. Mode II fracture toughness of a brittle and a ductile adhesive as a function of the adhesive thickness10.1080/00218464.2010.506155 ↗
25. The three-dimensional stress analysis of solid motor grain's analog bond specimen