journal article·2019-07

Effect of autoclave cure time and bonded surface roughness on the static and fatigue performance of polyurethane film Adhesive Single lap joints

Isotta Morfini, Luca Goglio, Giovanni Belingardi, Sayed A. Nassar

Publisher page

Abstract

Abstract This study investigates the effect of autoclave cure time and bonded surface roughness on the static and fatigue performance of film-adhesive single lap joints. Joint static performance is assessed in terms of its load transfer capacity in a quasi-static tensile-shear test to failure. Effect on fatigue life under a mean and cyclic tensile-shear amplitude is also investigated. Two levels autoclave cure (soak) time and two levels of bond surface roughness are investigated. All other autoclaving process variables are kept constant; namely, the ramp rate of temperature rise/cooling, pressurization/depressurization, as well as the cure temperature and cure pressure levels. Test joints are made of aluminium-aluminium or aluminium-magnesium adherends, joined with a polyurethane film adhesive. The results suggest that: an increase of the surface roughness is beneficial to static strength and detrimental to fatigue strength; an increase of the autoclave soak (cure) time is beneficial both to static and fatigue strength. Test data, failure mode analysis, discussion, observations and conclusions are provided.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Mechanical Behavior of Composites · Structural Behavior of Reinforced Concrete · Fatigue and fracture mechanics

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (20)

Show source-provided references
1. 2018
2. Mueller · 2016
3. Wegman · 1989
4. Review of surface pretreatments for aluminium alloys10.1016/S0143-7496(96)00014-0 ↗
5. Influence of surface macroroughness on the durability of epoxide-aluminium joints10.1016/0143-7496(95)91628-J ↗
6. Evaluation of mechanical interlock effect on adhesion strength of polymer-metal interfaces using micro-patterned surface topography10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2010.05.004 ↗
7. Effect of different substrate pre-treatments on the resistance of aluminum joints to moist environments10.1080/00218464.2012.759883 ↗
8. Assessing stress state and mean load effects on the fatigue response of adhesively bonded joints10.1016/S0143-7496(98)00049-9 ↗
9. The effect of surface pretreatment and moisture on the fatigue performance of adhesively-bonded aluminium10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2004.04.319 ↗
10. The effects of surface pretreatment on the cyclic-fatigue characteristics of bonded aluminium-alloy joints10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2004.12.004 ↗
11. The dependence of the fatigue life of adhesive joints on surface preparation10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2005.03.006 ↗
12. Variable amplitude fatigue of bonded aluminum joints10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2007.01.027 ↗
13. Strength wearout of adhesively bonded joints under constant amplitude fatigue10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2008.11.007 ↗
14. An investigation of fatigue failure prediction of adhesively bonded metal/metal joints10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2009.06.003 ↗
15. Evaluation of fatigue life of adhesively bonded aluminum single-lap joints using interfacial parameters10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2009.07.001 ↗
16. Shear fatigue of the bonded and frictional interface under constant normal pre-stress10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2014.08.014 ↗
17. Aluminium alloy 6061-T6511 datasheet, http://aluminum.adimetal.com/Asset/adi-6061-t6511-square-bar.pdf, last accessed February 2019.
18. 2013
19. 2010
20. Minitab Statistical Software, DOE analysis, effect plot analysis.