AFM adhesion force measurements on conversion-coated EN AW-6082-T6 aluminium
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Atomic force microscopy (AFM) has been used to measure the adhesion force between functionalised AFM tips and smooth surfaces of an EN AW-6082-T6 aluminium alloy, both before and after application of different conversion coatings. In addition, the surface of a sapphire sample was studied as a model aluminium surface. The results obtained for the sapphire surface were highly reproducible, and were used as a mean to establish proper routines for the more complex industrial surfaces. The adhesion force between a chromate conversion-coated (CCC) EN AW-6082-T6 aluminium alloy and a COOH functionalised tip was significantly increased compared to the uncoated surface, probably as a result of strong hydrogen bonding. However, the adhesion force decreased with time during the first 24 h after treatment due to aging of the CCC. Chromate-free Ti–Zr-based treatment also increased the adhesion, but the adhesion force varied significantly due to non-uniform deposition and composition of the conversion coating. The measured AFM adhesion forces correlated qualitatively with macroscopic adhesion test results obtained previously for these specific conversion coatings. The AFM technique may thus provide useful information on the adhesion behaviour of heterogeneous conversion-coated aluminium surfaces.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Force Microscopy Techniques and Applications · Corrosion Behavior and Inhibition · Metal and Thin Film Mechanics
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (21)
Show source-provided references
1. Sheasby · 2001
2. Lunder · Surf Coat Technol · 2004 · 184 · 27810.1016/j.surfcoat.2003.11.003 ↗
3. Butt · Surf Sci Rep · 2005 · 59 · 110.1016/j.surfrep.2005.08.003 ↗
4. Thoreson · J Colloid Interface Sci · 2006 · 298 · 9410.1016/j.jcis.2005.11.054 ↗
5. Lunder · Int J Adhes Adhes · 2004 · 24 · 10710.1016/j.ijadhadh.2003.07.002 ↗
6. Tanem · Corros Sci · 2005 · 47 · 150610.1016/j.corsci.2004.07.029 ↗
7. Drelich · J Colloid Interface Sci · 2004 · 280 · 48410.1016/j.jcis.2004.08.002 ↗
8. Cleveland · Rev Sci Instrum · 1993 · 64 · 40310.1063/1.1144209 ↗
9. Mondolfo · 1976
10. Lunder · Corros Sci · 2005 · 47 · 160410.1016/j.corsci.2004.08.012 ↗
11. van der Vegte · Langmuir · 1997 · 13 · 435710.1021/la970025k ↗
12. Chidambaram · J Electrochem Soc · 2004 · 151 · B15110.1149/1.1644602 ↗
13. Chidambaram · Electrochim Acta · 2005 · 51 · 286210.1016/j.electacta.2005.08.022 ↗
14. Kaibara · Diamond Relat Mater · 2003 · 12 · 56010.1016/S0925-9635(02)00373-4 ↗
15. Kendig · Surf Coat Technol · 2001 · 140 · 5810.1016/S0257-8972(01)01099-4 ↗
16. van den Brand · Prog Org Coat · 2004 · 51 · 33910.1016/j.porgcoat.2004.08.005 ↗
17. Hughes · Surf Interface Anal · 1997 · 25 · 22310.1002/(SICI)1096-9918(199704)25:4<223::AID-SIA225>3.0.CO;2-D ↗
18. Maeda · Prog Org Coat · 1998 · 33 · 8310.1016/S0300-9440(98)00014-9 ↗
19. Zhang · Corrosion · 2003 · 59 · 35610.5006/1.3277568 ↗
20. Laget · J Electrochem Soc · 2003 · 150 · B42510.1149/1.1593040 ↗
21. Lubarsky · Surf Sci · 2004 · 558 · 13510.1016/j.susc.2004.03.054 ↗