Experimental evaluation of reinforcing the single lap joint in both longitudinal and transverse direction under tensile and bending condition
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract The effect of pins and wires as reinforcing elements in the single adhesive joints under tension and bending has been investigated in this study. Four types of joint specimens were made for this reason. Type one specimen, having no reinforcements and type two having 20 metallic wires of 0.2 mm diameter in longitudinal direction. Type three consist of 6 steel pins having 1 mm diameter in transverse direction. In type four, both the pins in transverse and wires in longitudinal direction have been used to reinforce the joint. After manufacturing of the samples, their tensile and bending properties were investigated. The results show that, pins increase bending strength and toughness during both tensile and bending while metallic wires increase tensile strength and modulus of joint. Overall, the sample with combined reinforcements has the highest tensile and bending properties apart from modulus. Since the weight of the reinforcements used are negligible, the specific properties of the joint has been improved significantly. The tensile specific strength and toughness of combined reinforced joint as compared to simple joint with no reinforcement has been improved by 33.48% and 82.52% respectively. Also in that case, the specific bending strength and toughness are improved by 64.4% and 231.91% respectively.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Mechanical Behavior of Composites · Structural Load-Bearing Analysis · Structural Behavior of Reinforced Concrete
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (23)
Show source-provided references
1. 3D reinforcement of stiffener-to-skin T-joints by Z-pinning and tufting10.1016/j.engfracmech.2006.06.012 ↗
2. Bonded-bolted composite joints,10.2514/3.45237 ↗
3. Experimental study of the influence of adhesive reinforcement in lap joints for composite structures subjected to mechanical loads,10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2008.04.009 ↗
4. Bianchi · 2012
5. Damage analysis of composite – aluminium adhesively-bonded single-lap joints,10.1016/j.compstruct.2015.09.054 ↗
6. Adhesive strength of nano-size particles filled thermoplastic polyimides . Part-II : Aluminum nitride ( AlN ) nano-powder – polyimide composite films10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2006.06.002 ↗
7. The effect of macro fiber reinforcements on mechanical behavior of single lap adhesively bonded joints in two different orientations
8. Metallic fiber-reinforced adhesively bonded joints,10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2014.08.005 ↗
9. Fatigue of hybrid (adhesive / bolted) joints in SRIM composites10.1016/S0143-7496(00)00047-6 ↗
10. Load transfer in hybrid (bonded / bolted) composite single-lap joints,10.1016/j.compstruct.2004.04.016 ↗
11. Failure of carbon composite-to-aluminum joints with combined mechanical fastening and adhesive bonding,10.1016/j.compstruct.2006.04.013 ↗
12. Improving performance of GFRP / aluminum single lap joints using bolted / co-cured hybrid method10.1016/j.compositesa.2007.11.009 ↗
13. Composites: part A The development and scalability of a high strength, damage tolerant, hybrid joining scheme for composite – metal structures,10.1016/j.compositesa.2014.04.018 ↗
14. Failure of transversely stitched rtm lap joints
15. Bearing failure of composite bolted joints with non-uniform bolt-to-washer clearance
16. Properties and failure mechanisms of pinned composite lap joints in monotonic and cyclic tension,10.1016/j.compscitech.2005.11.039 ↗
17. Composites: part A Experimental investigation of a novel hybrid metal – composite joining technology,10.1016/j.compositesa.2009.11.003 ↗
18. Influence of pinning on static strength of co- cured metal-GFRP hybrid single lap joints Composites: part A,10.1016/j.compositesa.2016.01.011 ↗
19. Huntsman, “Araldite ® LY 5052 / Aradur ® 5052 *,” no. October, pp. 1–6, 2007.
20. Mechanical properties of hardened AISI 52100 steel in hard machining processes10.1115/1.1413775 ↗
21. “Modelling of single-lap joints using cohesive zone models: effect of the cohesive parameters on the output of the simulations10.1080/00218464.2012.660834 ↗
22. Grade-7075-Text-data; 2014. 〈https://www.clintonaluminum.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/Grade-7075-Text-data.pdf〉.
23. Hart-Smith LJ. , NASA Langley contract report,” NASA, p. CR-112237; 1973.