journal article·2024-08Open access

Impact of surface preparation method on the fracture toughness of adhesive joints subjected to diverse loading modes

R.M. Carneiro Neto, E.F. Vogas, A. Akhavan-Safar, R.J.C. Carbas, E.M. Sampaio, L.F.M. da Silva

Abstract

While research has explored surface treatment effects on fracture energies in pure modes (I or II), there is a lack of research under mixed-mode loading. The aim of this paper is to investigate the influence of surface treatment approaches on the fracture behaviour and fracture energy of adhesive joints at different loading modes. To achieve this, double cantilever beam (DCB) adhesive joints were manufactured considering two different surface treatment methods namely grit blasting and mechanical bristle blasting. The joints were subjected to five different mode mixities. Fracture energy for each tested condition was calculated based on a compliance-based approach. The fracture energies in mode I reached an increase of 55 % when grit blasting surface treatment was applied, while for mode II the fracture energy reached a value three times higher for mechanical bristle blasting surface treatment, both energies from the mixed mode tests. The failure mechanisms were also evaluated for joints with different surface treatments as a function of loading mode. In all tested conditions, a cohesive failure mode was observed; however, the results underscore the substantial influence of the surface treatment method on the fracture energy of adhesive joints. This is attributed to the distinct failure mechanisms observed under varying surface treatment conditions.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Mechanical Behavior of Composites · Fatigue and fracture mechanics · High-Velocity Impact and Material Behavior

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (22)

Show source-provided references
1. A modified degradation technique for fatigue life assessment of adhesive materials subjected to cyclic shear loads10.1177/0954406220967684 ↗
2. From fundamental concepts to recent developments in the adhesive bonding technology: a general view10.1007/s44245-023-00014-7 ↗
3. da Silva · 2012
4. Observations of decreased fracture toughness for mixed mode fracture testing of adhesively bonded joints10.1163/156856109X452701 ↗
5. Crack path selection in adhesively bonded joints: the roles of external loads and speciment geometry10.1023/A:1015020919823 ↗
6. Surface preparation effects on mode I testing of adhesively bonded composite joints10.1520/CTR10895J ↗
7. Influence of surface preparation on the fracture behavior of acrylic adhesive/CFRP composite joints10.1080/00218464.2011.562114 ↗
8. Effect of atmospheric plasma treatment on Mode-I and Mode-II fracture toughness properties of adhesively bonded carbon fiber/PEKK composite joints10.1016/j.engfracmech.2023.109463 ↗
9. Bonding optimization on composite surfaces using atmospheric plasma treatment10.1163/016942411X576554 ↗
10. Development of pipe repairs using bonded metal plate – Part I: shape factor, stiffness and surface treatment
11. Effect of surface roughness and chemistry on the adhesion and durability of a steel-epoxy adhesive interface10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2019.102450 ↗
12. Preparation and characterization of steel surfaces for adhesive bonding10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.0000387 ↗
13. Effect of surface roughness on the strength of cleavage joints10.1016/S0143-7496(01)00059-8 ↗
14. An apparatus for mixed-mode fracture characterization of adhesive joints10.1016/j.tafmec.2017.04.014 ↗
15. Fatigue crack growth analysis of different adhesive systems: effects of mode mixity and load level10.1111/ffe.13145 ↗
16. Crack equivalent concept applied to the fracture characterization of bonded joints under pure mode I loading10.1016/j.compscitech.2008.04.003 ↗
17. Pure mode II fracture characterization of composite bonded joints10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2008.12.001 ↗
18. Fatigue behaviour of an epoxy adhesive under mixed-mode conditions, Tecnol. Metal
19. A comparative study of the effect of various surface treatments on the fracture behavior of aluminum adhesive joints under mode I loading10.1007/s42452-024-05622-w ↗
20. Studies on the influence of surface treatment type, in the effectiveness of structural adhesive bonding, for carbon fiber reinforced composites10.1016/j.jmapro.2019.02.014 ↗
21. Effect of creep on the mode II residual fracture energy of adhesives10.1002/app.51387 ↗
22. Influence of surface morphology on the adhesion strength of epoxy–aluminum interfaces10.1163/156856103322396749 ↗