journal article·2025-02

Preheated composite resins versus luting cement: Degree of conversion, film thickness, color stability and bond strength to enamel and ceramic veneers

Carolina Carramilo Raposo, Paulo Vitor Campos Ferreira, Luanna Marinho Sereno Nery, Bruno Martins Maciel, Diego Machado Ardenghi, José Bauer, Darlon Martins Lima

Publisher page

Abstract

Purpose The literature is scarce regarding the use of preheated composite resin for cementing dental ceramic veneers. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effect of using preheated composite resins as cementing agents on the degree of conversion, film thickness, color stability and bond strength of dental ceramic veneers. Material and methods Three composite resins, Filtek Z100 (Z100), Opus Bulk Fill APS (Opus) and Viscalor Bulk (Viscalor) were preheated and compared with Opus Bulk Fill Flow APS (Opus Flow) and resin cement RelyX Veneer (RelyX). The properties of degree of conversion, film thickness, color stability and microshear bond strength were tested. Statistical analysis was performed using ANOVA and Holm-Sidak tests (α = 0.05). Results The Opus Flow showed a higher degree of conversion compared to Z100 and Viscalor ( P < 0.05), but similar to Opus and RelyX. The film thickness of all preheated resins was greater than the film thickness of the flow resin and the resin cement ( P < 0.001). In the enamel surface, the bond strength of Viscalor was superior to RelyX ( P < 0.001). In the ceramic surface, the bond strength of preheated resins was superior to the resin cement ( P < 0.05). Color stability was significantly influenced by the time factor ( P < 0.05), but there was no difference between the different materials ( P > 0.05). There was no difference between the storage time of 30 days and 6 months. Conclusions The preheated composite resins showed a degree of conversion and color stability similar to the resin cement, but its film thickness was greater than the resin cement and the flowable resin. Viscalor showed the highest bond strength to enamel. Clinical implications Although preheated resins present similar characteristics to resin cements and flowable composite resins, the film thickness of preheated composite resins is high, which can lead to failures in the adaptation of dental ceramic veneers or even the fracture of the dental ceramic veneer during its cementation.
Source: expertdata · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Dental materials and restorations · Conservation Techniques and Studies · Pigment Synthesis and Properties

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (32)

Show source-provided references
1. Minimally invasive laminate veneers: clinical aspects in treatment planning and cementation procedures
2. Clinical longevity and trend analysis of 801 ultrathin ceramic veneers: a clinical cohort study10.1016/j.prosdent.2022.04.006 ↗
3. Shade of resin-based luting agents and final color of porcelain veneers10.1111/jerd.12196 ↗
4. Resin-based luting agents and color stability of bonded ceramic veneers10.1016/j.prosdent.2015.01.008 ↗
5. Effect of luting agent on the load to failure and accelerated-fatigue resistance of lithium disilicate laminate veneers10.1016/j.dental.2017.09.010 ↗
6. Color stability of ceramic veneers luted with resin cements and pre-heated composites: 12 months follow-up10.1590/0103-6440202002842 ↗
7. Viscosity and thermal kinetics of 10 preheated restorative resin composites and effect of ultrasound energy on film thickness10.1016/j.dental.2020.08.004 ↗
8. Color stability, opacity and degree of conversion of pre-heated composites10.1016/j.jdent.2010.12.001 ↗
9. Response of composite resins to preheating and the resulting strengthening of luted feldspar ceramic10.1016/j.dental.2019.07.021 ↗
10. Luting indirect restorations with resin cements versus composite resins: effects of preheating and ultrasound energy on film thickness10.1111/jerd.12851 ↗
11. Volumetric shrinkage and film thickness of cementation materials for veneers: an in vitro 3D microcomputed tomography analysis10.1016/j.prosdent.2016.08.029 ↗
12. Flexural strength of preheated resin composites and bonding properties to glass-ceramic and dentin10.3390/ma9020083 ↗
13. Curing potential and color stability of different resin-based luting materials10.1016/j.dental.2020.07.003 ↗
14. Preheated composite resin used as a luting agent for indirect restorations: effects on bond strength and resin-dentin interfaces
15. Microshear bond strength of preheated silorane- and methacrylate-based composite resins to dentin10.1002/sca.21242 ↗
16. Does the use of preheated restorative resin composite as a luting agent influence the adaptation of fixed dental prostheses? A systematic review10.1016/j.prosdent.2022.02.008 ↗
17. Heating and preheating of dental restorative materials—a systematic review10.1007/s00784-020-03637-2 ↗
18. Marginal integrity and physicomechanical properties of a thermoviscous and regular bulk-fill resin composites10.1007/s00784-024-05887-w ↗
19. Viscosity and stickiness of dental resin composites at elevated temperatures10.1016/j.dental.2020.11.024 ↗
20. Influence of pre-heating regular resin composites and flowable composites on luting ceramic veneers with different thicknesses10.1590/0103-6440201902513 ↗
21. Clinical performance and chemical-physical properties of bulk fill composites resin —a systematic review and meta-analysis10.1016/j.dental.2019.07.007 ↗
22. Light and viscosity effects on the curing potential of bulk-fill composites placed in deep cavities10.1007/s10266-021-00614-3 ↗
23. Degree of conversion of bulk-fill compared to conventional resin-composites at two time intervals10.1016/j.dental.2013.05.011 ↗
24. 2000
25. Shear bond strength of porcelain laminate veneers to enamel, dentine and enamel–dentine complex bonded with different adhesive luting systems10.1016/j.jdent.2012.04.005 ↗
26. Microtensile bond strength of lithium disilicate ceramics to resin adhesives
27. Shear bond strength of composite resin cements to lithium disilicate ceramics10.1111/j.1365-2842.2004.01400.x ↗
28. Microshear bond strength of resin cements to lithium disilicate substrates as a function of surface preparation10.2341/14-240-L ↗
29. Comparison of the microshear bond strength of feldspathic porcelain to enamel with three luting resins10.1016/j.jpor.2010.10.002 ↗
30. Aspects of bonding between resin luting cements and glass ceramic materials10.1016/j.dental.2014.01.017 ↗
31. Evaluation of color stability and microhardness of contemporary bulk-fill composite resins with different polymerization properties10.1111/jerd.12879 ↗
32. Pre-heating effects on extrusion force, stickness and packability of resin-based composite10.1016/j.dental.2019.08.101 ↗