journal article·2019-12

Peel testing of a packaging material laminate studied by in-situ X-ray tomography and cohesive zone modeling

Simon Pettersson, Jonas Engqvist, Stephen Hall, Nils Toft, Håkan Hallberg

Publisher page

Abstract

Abstract Peel testing is used to study adhesive fracture in packaging material laminates. The focus is on improved understanding of the mechanisms that provide a laminate's adhesive properties, as measured by standard macroscopic tests. Using a specially-designed peel test load rig, peel tests are performed in-situ in a laboratory X-ray tomograph. The peel test results are analyzed using a combination of theoretical models for the adhesive fracture and 3D finite element simulations based on a cohesive zone model approach. Complementary experiments are performed to characterize the properties of the peel arm material. Relaxation of the material is found to occur during image acquisition in the in-situ tests. Despite this, it is possible to obtain 3D reconstructions with good quality during peeling. Peel test properties like the peel arm's root rotation angle and peel arm thinning are quantified. In the present 90° peel tests, it is found that the delamination progresses in an inhomogeneous manner, with the edges delaminating before the center. A number of issues and mechanisms during the peel test are identified. As an example, the peel arm itself can sometimes split, leaving residues of adhesive on the substrate surface. Such phenomena indicate the ambiguities involved in assessing adhesion properties from standard macroscopic force-displacement measurements, without accounting for the mechanisms involved on finer length scales.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Mechanical Behavior of Composites · Material Properties and Processing · Structural Analysis of Composite Materials

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (21)

Show source-provided references
1. Anderson · 2013
2. Kinloch · 2012
3. Adhesion strength of lead zirconate titanate sol-gel thin films10.1016/j.tsf.2015.12.014 ↗
4. Prediction of delamination of steel-polymer composites using cohesive zone model and peeling tests10.1016/j.compstruct.2016.10.025 ↗
5. 3D optical displacement measurements on dynamically loaded adhesively bonded T-peel specimens10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2014.07.013 ↗
6. Study of peeling properties of pressure-sensitive adhesives using a newly developed image processing system10.1016/0143-7496(94)90019-1 ↗
7. Identifying traction-separation behavior of self-adhesive polymeric films from in situ digital images under T-peeling10.1016/j.jmps.2016.03.001 ↗
8. Fracture mechanics on polyethylene/polybutene-1 peel films10.1016/j.polymertesting.2008.09.002 ↗
9. Adhesion of heterogeneous thin films ii: adhesive heterogeneity10.1016/j.jmps.2015.06.010 ↗
10. Multiscale stick-slip dynamics of adhesive tape peeling10.1103/PhysRevLett.115.128301 ↗
11. Stick-slip substructure in rapid tape peeling10.1103/PhysRevE.82.046107 ↗
12. Cohesive zone modeling of mode i tearing in thin soft materials10.1016/j.jmbbm.2013.07.015 ↗
13. Modelling adhesive joints with cohesive zone models: effect of the cohesive law shape of the adhesive layer10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2013.02.006 ↗
14. Debonding of confined elastomeric layer using cohesive zone model10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2015.12.006 ↗
15. A parametric study of the peel test10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2007.06.006 ↗
16. Modelling the interfacial peeling of pressure-sensitive adhesives10.1016/j.jnnfm.2014.10.005 ↗
17. Modelling the peeling behavior of soft adhesives
18. The peeling of flexible laminates10.1007/BF00012635 ↗
19. A relationship between effective work of adhesion and peel force for thin hyperelastic films undergoing large deformation
20. The effective work of adhesion
21. Thin-film peeling - the elastic term10.1088/0022-3727/8/13/005 ↗