Assessment of test methods for thick and thin layer adhesive joints under high rates of loading
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Testing procedures for two classes of adhesives with different characteristics for high rate testing using a Split Hopkinson Tension Bar are presented. The adhesive joints differ in their mechanical behavior, in the joint geometry, and in the interest of investigation. For thin layer adhesive joints, the adhesive thickness is usually below one millimeter. The strength is high and the strain to failure is comparatively small. In contrast, thick layer adhesive joints are characterized by adhesive thicknesses of several millimeters. The strength is comparatively small, however the strain to failure is quite large. For both classes of adhesives thick-walled butt joint specimens with different geometries were used for testing. The results show that for thin and thick layer adhesive joints Split Hopkinson Tension Bar experiments in the strain rate regime of 1000 s-1 can be performed successfully and results with high quality can be generated.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: High-Velocity Impact and Material Behavior · Energetic Materials and Combustion · Structural Response to Dynamic Loads
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (27)
Show source-provided references
1. Assessment of experimental methods for calibrating rate-dependent cohesive zone models for predicting failure in adhesively bonded metallic structures10.1016/j.engfailanal.2014.12.008 ↗
2. Experimental analysis of the mechanical behaviour of a thick flexible adhesive under tensile/compression-shear loads10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2013.09.040 ↗
3. Mechanical characterization of flexible adhesives10.1080/00218460902881808 ↗
4. Adhesives and adhesive joints under impact loadings: an overview
5. Rate dependent behavior of crash-optimized adhesives – Experimental characterization, model development, and simulation10.1016/j.engfracmech.2014.11.006 ↗
6. Effect of temperature and strain rate on single lap joints with dissimilar lightweight adherends bonded with an acrylic adhesive10.1016/j.compstruct.2016.05.034 ↗
7. Measuring the critical energy release rate in mode II of tough, structural adhesive joints using the tapered end-notched flexure (TENF) test10.1140/epjst/e2012-01584-4 ↗
8. The fracture behaviour of structural adhesives under high rates of testing10.1016/j.engfracmech.2009.07.013 ↗
9. Flexible adhesives for automotive application under impact loading10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2014.08.001 ↗
10. Comparison of the mechanical behaviour between stiff and flexible adhesive joints for the automotive industry10.1080/00218464.2010.482440 ↗
11. Strength of adhesively-bonded butt joints of tubes subjected to combined high-rate loads10.1080/00218469908010487 ↗
12. Mechanical properties of an epoxy-based adhesive under high strain rate loadings at low temperature environment10.1016/j.compositesb.2016.08.034 ↗
13. High-strain-rate tensile mechanical response of a polyurethane elastomeric material10.1016/j.polymer.2015.03.046 ↗
14. Evaluation of impact shear strength of adhesive joints with the Split Hopkinson Bar
15. Experimental investigation of the shear dynamic behavior of double-lap adhesively bonded joints on a wide range of strain rates10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2010.11.014 ↗
16. Finite-element analysis of SHPB tests on double-lap adhesive joints10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2010.02.004 ↗
17. Yokoyama T. Experimental determination of impact tensile properties of adhesive butt joints with the split Hopkinson bar; 2003.10.1243/030932403765310563 ↗
18. Determination of the impact tensile strength of structural adhesive butt joints with a modified split Hopkinson pressure bar10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2014.07.011 ↗
19. Chen W, Zhang B, Forrestal MJ. A split Hopkinson bar technique for low-impedance materials.
20. Ledford N, Paul H, Ganzenmüller G, et al. Investigations on specimen design and mounting for Split Hopkinson Tension Bar (SHTB) experiments. In: Proceedings of DYMAT, Lugano, Switzerland; 2015.10.1051/epjconf/20159401049 ↗
21. A new split Hopkinson tensile bar design10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2012.08.004 ↗
22. On the use of non-cylindrical specimens in a split-Hopkinson pressure bar10.1177/0309324711410127 ↗
23. Strength of cylindrical butt joints bonded with epoxy adhesives under combined static or high-rate loading10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2015.12.030 ↗
24. Effect of strain rate and fibre rotation on the in-plane shear response of ±45° laminates in tension and compression tests10.1016/j.compscitech.2016.09.016 ↗
25. Ledford N, Paul H, Sauer M, May M. Investigation of the dynamic behavior of a PU based adhesive using Split‐Hopkinson Tensile and Compression Bars. In: Proceedings of ICILSM, Turin, Italy; 2016.
26. Characterization of aluminium one-component polyurethane adhesive joints as a function of bond thickness for the automotive industry: fracture analysis and behavior10.1016/j.engfracmech.2017.03.044 ↗
27. On experimental methods to investigate the effect of layer thickness on the fracture behavior of adhesively bonded joints10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2011.08.004 ↗