In vitro Streptococcus mutans biofilm formation on surfaces of chlorhexidine-containing dentin bonding systems
Source abstract
Abstract
This in vitro study evaluated the influence of chlorhexidine diacetate (CDA) when blended within dentin bonding systems (DBSs) on Streptococcus mutans (S. mutans) biofilm formation. One commercially available 0.2% wt CDA-containing DBS (Peak Universal Bond) and five experimental 0.2% wt CDA-containing DBS formulations (experimental Adper Scotchbond 1XT plus experimental resins, R2, R3, R4, R5) were assessed vs their no-CDA containing counterparts. Twenty-eight DBSs disks were prepared for each group (6.4 mm×1.0 mm) and cured for 80 s at 800 mW/cm2 in a nitrogen atmosphere. A modified Drip-Flow Reactor was used to grow S. mutans biofilms on specimen surfaces for 24 h and adherent, viable biomass was evaluated using a tetrazolium salt assay (MTT). Two specimens from each of the tested materials were processed with LIVE/DEAD stain and observed using laser confocal microscopy (CLSM) while two disks from each group were examined by using scanning electron microscopy (SEM). MTT assay, CLSM and SEM observations showed that CDA addition decreased, increased or did not change S. mutans biofilm formation. The lowest biofilm formation was obtained with Peak Universal Bond and R5 (with and without CDA). It may be concluded that the chemical composition of DBSs determines their ability to promote or hamper biofilm formation. Therefore, CDA addition may be helpful in modulating biofilm formation provided that DBS formulation is tuned and optimized.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Dental materials and restorations · Oral microbiology and periodontitis research · Endodontics and Root Canal Treatments
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (48)
Show source-provided references
1. Dental caries10.1016/S0140-6736(07)60031-2 ↗
2. Biofilm formation on dental restorative and implant materials10.1177/0022034510368644 ↗
3. What constitutes dental caries? Histopathology of carious enamel and dentin related to the action of cariogenic biofilms10.1177/154405910408301s07 ↗
4. State of the art of self-etch adhesives10.1016/j.dental.2010.10.023 ↗
5. State of the art etch-and-rinse adhesives10.1016/j.dental.2010.10.016 ↗
6. Non-invasive quantification of resin-dentin interfacial gaps using optical coherence tomography: validation against confocal microscopy10.1016/j.dental.2011.05.003 ↗
7. Antibacterial resin monomers based on quaternary ammonium and their benefits in restorative dentistry10.1016/j.jdsr.2012.02.003 ↗
8. Antimicrobial properties of conventional restorative filling materials and advances in antimicrobial properties of composite resins and glass ionomer cements-A literature review10.1016/j.dental.2014.12.005 ↗
9. In vitro antibacterial activity of adhesive systems on Streptococcus mutans
10. Influence of MDPB-containing primer on Streptococcus mutans biofilm formation in simulated Class I restorations
11. The use of nanoparticles to control oral biofilm formation10.1177/0022034510377794 ↗
12. Effect of chlorhexidine incorporation into a self-etching primer on dentine bond strength of a luting cement10.1016/j.jdent.2010.03.005 ↗
13. Fluoride-containing restorative materials10.1111/j.1875-595X.2006.tb00072.x ↗
14. Development of remineralizing, antibacterial dental materials10.1016/j.actbio.2009.03.030 ↗
15. Composition and susceptibility to chlorhexidine of multispecies biofilms of oral bacteria10.1128/AEM.64.9.3515-3519.1998 ↗
16. The effect of 0.12% chlorhexidine gluconate rinsing on previously plaque-free and plaque-covered surfaces: a randomized, controlled clinical trial10.1902/jop.2007.070090 ↗
17. Effect of chlorhexidine mouthrinse on cathepsin C activity in human saliva
18. Antibacterial and physical properties of resin modified glass-ionomers combined with chlorhexidine10.1046/j.1365-2842.2002.00876.x ↗
19. Chlorhexidine release from an experimental glass ionomer cement10.1016/j.biomaterials.2003.12.051 ↗
20. Role of dentin MMPs in caries progression and bond stability10.1177/0022034514562833 ↗
21. Chlorhexidine stabilizes the adhesive interface: a 2-year in vitro study10.1016/j.dental.2009.11.153 ↗
22. Chlorhexidine application to stabilize the adhesive interface: why and how?
23. A 2-year in vitro evaluation of a chlorhexidine-containing acid on the durability of resin-dentin interfaces10.1016/j.jdent.2010.10.001 ↗
24. Hydrophilicity of dentin bonding systems influences in vitro Streptococcus mutans biofilm formation10.1016/j.dental.2014.05.009 ↗
25. Influence of chlorhexidine on the degree of conversion and E-modulus of experimental adhesive blends10.1016/j.dental.2009.05.008 ↗
26. Effects of resin hydrophilicity on water sorption and changes in modulus of elasticity10.1016/j.biomaterials.2005.04.052 ↗
27. Influence of matrix and filler fraction on biofilm formation on the surface of experimental resin-based composites10.1007/s10856-014-5372-4 ↗
28. Influence of surface properties of resin-based composites on in vitro Streptococcus mutans biofilm development10.1111/j.1600-0722.2012.00983.x ↗
29. Streptococcus mutans biofilm formation and release of fluoride from experimental resin-based composites depending on surface treatment and S-PRG filler particle fraction
30. Levorotatory carbohydrates and xylitol subdue Streptococcus mutans and Candida albicans adhesion and biofilm formation
31. NIH Image to ImageJ: 25 years of image analysis10.1038/nmeth.2089 ↗
32. Biofilms: microbial life on surfaces10.3201/eid0809.020063 ↗
33. Targeted immobilisation of lysozyme in the enamel pellicle from different solutions10.1007/s00784-009-0357-2 ↗
34. A method for growing a biofilm under low shear at the air-liquid interface using the drip flow biofilm reactor10.1038/nprot.2009.59 ↗
35. Chapter 4: in vitro biofilm models: an overview10.1016/S0065-2164(09)69004-3 ↗
36. Artificial dental plaque biofilm model systems10.1177/08959374970110010201 ↗
37. Rosentritt M, Hahnel S, Groger G, Muhlfriedel B, Burgers R, Handel G Adhesion of Streptococcus mutans to various dental materials in a laminar flow chamber system. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater, 86; 2008. pp. 36–44.10.1002/jbm.b.30985 ↗
38. Comparison of surface roughness of oral hard materials to the threshold surface roughness for bacterial plaque retention: a review of the literature10.1016/S0109-5641(97)80038-3 ↗
39. Influence of resin monomers on growth of oral streptococci10.1177/154405910408300406 ↗
40. Surface properties of resin-based composite materials and biofilm formation: a review of the current literature
41. The influence of light-curing time on the bacterial colonization of resin composite surfaces10.1016/j.dental.2009.02.012 ↗
42. Effect of material characteristics and/or surface topography on biofilm development10.1111/j.1600-0501.2006.01353.x ↗
43. The structure, function and properties of the acquired pellicle
44. Effect of biofilm on the repair bond strengths of composites10.1177/0022034510381395 ↗
45. Lack of buffering by composites promotes shift to more cariogenic bacteria10.1177/0022034516647677 ↗
46. Chlorhexidine release and water sorption characteristics of chlorhexidine-incorporated hydrophobic/hydrophilic resins10.1016/j.dental.2008.03.011 ↗
47. Antimicrobial activity and local release characteristics of chlorhexidine diacetate loaded within the dental copolymer matrix, ethylene vinyl acetate10.1002/jbm.b.31049 ↗
48. Influence of chlorhexidine concentration on the durability of etch-and-rinse dentin bonds: a 12-month in vitro study