Towards pure mode I loading in dissimilar adhesively bonded double cantilever beams
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Nowadays, dissimilar adhesive joints are used widely in different industrial sectors. For this type of joints, the investigation of the fracture behaviour under pure mode I loading is a vital issue. In order to study mode I fracture parameters of adhesive joints, scientists have proposed standard double cantilever beam (DCB) specimens. In dissimilar DCB adhesive joints, because of material asymmetry, obtaining pure mode I is challenging. To obtain pure mode I loading in dissimilar DCB joints, scientists have proposed two criteria based on (1) the flexural stiffness and (2) the distribution of the longitudinal strain along the bondline. However, the achievement of pure mode I in dissimilar DCB joints needs more research. In this paper, the mode-mixity in dissimilar DCB joints designed based on the two mentioned criteria is investigated numerically and experimentally. Metal-composite DCBs were fabricated and tested. During the tensile tests, the horizontal and vertical displacement fields of the adhesive layer were calculated using digital image correlation (DIC) and the finite element method (FEM). Based on the obtained displacement fields and using Williams’ series expansion, the mode-mixities were investigated. The results show that in order to achieve pure mode I loading in steel-composite joints, the criterion based on longitudinal strain is more suitable and in aluminium-composite joints the mode-mixities given by two criteria are almost the same.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Mechanical Behavior of Composites · Fatigue and fracture mechanics · Structural Load-Bearing Analysis
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (25)
Show source-provided references
1. The potential for the use of composite materials in marine structures10.1016/0951-8339(94)90034-5 ↗
2. Review of advanced composite structures for naval ships and submarines10.1016/S0263-8223(00)00175-6 ↗
3. Boeman · 1999
4. Failure analysis of adhesively-bonded skin-to-stiffener joints: metal–metal vs. composite–metal10.1016/j.engfailanal.2015.05.023 ↗
5. Interface adhesion assessment of composite-to-metal bonded joints under salt spray conditions using peel tests10.1016/j.compstruct.2016.12.058 ↗
6. An updated review of adhesively bonded joints in composite materials10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2016.10.010 ↗
7. Rans · 2009 · 73
8. On the bondline thickness effect in mixed-mode fracture characterisation of an epoxy adhesive
9. Lifetime assessment of structural adhesive joints by combining effects of mechanical load, humidity, moisture and UV: design of a test rig10.1080/00218464.2019.1661838 ↗
10. Experimental study of the influence of ply orientation on DCB mode-I delamination behavior by using multidirectional fully isotropic carbon/epoxy laminates10.1016/j.compstruct.2016.11.036 ↗
11. Interlaminar fracture toughness of unidirectional DCB specimens: a novel theoretical approach10.1016/j.polymertesting.2011.08.012 ↗
12. Fernandes · 2020 · 112643
13. Calculation of energy release rate for adhesive composite/metal joints under mode-I loading considering effect of the non-uniformity10.1016/j.compositesb.2016.04.001 ↗
14. Fracture toughness of adhesive bonded composite joints under mixed mode loading
15. Fracture analysis in adhesive composite material/aluminum joints under mode-I loading; experimental and numerical approaches10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2012.06.005 ↗
16. How pure mode I can be obtained in bi-material bonded DCB joints: a longitudinal strain-based criterion10.1016/j.compositesb.2018.07.033 ↗
17. An over‐deterministic method for calculation of coefficients of crack tip asymptotic field from finite element analysis10.1111/j.1460-2695.2010.01504.x ↗
18. Sutton · 2009
19. On fracture characteristics of adhesive joints with dissimilar materials – an experimental study using digital image correlation (DIC) technique10.1016/j.compstruct.2018.06.018 ↗
20. Girolamo · 2014
21. Effect of residual strains on the static strength of dissimilar single lap adhesive joints
22. Hild · 2006
23. Two-dimensional digital image correlation for in-plane displacement and strain measurement: a review10.1088/0957-0233/20/6/062001 ↗
24. On the stress distribution at the base of a stationary crack10.1115/1.4011454 ↗
25. Effect of the size reduction on the bulk tensile and double cantilever beam specimens used in cohesive zone models